Global Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology

The Global Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology (GJAST) aims to publish high-quality papers in all major areas of applied sciences and technology. It is encouraged that manuscripts that meet the general criteria of significance and scientific excellence be submitted.

Featuring research papers, reviews, case studies, and short communications from all disciplines of science and technology, GJAST is committed to presenting research in all fields. It is the aim of GJAST to facilitate research by not excluding papers based on the subject area and to publish papers if they are technically correct and scientifically motivated.

The Global Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology also publishes research articles, editorials, reviews, short communications, case reports, letters to the editor, commentary, book reviews, etc.,

Review Process: Double-blinded peer review process

Publication Timeline: 15 Days peer review process

Plagiarism Policy

The articles submitted by authors must contain a minimum of 80% unique content (Which should be unique and must not copy from any other websites). The authors must maintain 100% uniqueness in the text’s results and conclusion. We will resend the articles, which have below 80% uniqueness to the authors for revision and ask for resubmissions with originality (as per guidelines).

Submit your manuscript online or an e-mail: editor.gjast222@gmail.com

The Global Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology (GJAST) is a journal that circulates articles based on the global development of all aspects of applied natural sciences and Technology. The mission of GJAST is to publish in a timely manner all Applied Sciences specialties comprising a comprehensive resource for physicians around the World.

The journal covers all applicable strives to publish the research in Subject areas covering, but not limited to, medicine, physics, chemistry, biology, environmental sciences, geology, engineering, agriculture, biotechnology, nanotechnology, arts, education, sociology and psychology, business and economics, finance, mathematics and statistics, computer science, social sciences, linguistics, Agricultural Sciences, Animal Husbandry, Astronomy and Space, Ayurveda, Biology, Chemical Sciences, Earth Sciences, Engineering (all divisions), Environmental Sciences, Interdisciplinary, Mathematical Sciences, Nano Science, General Science, Biomedical Sciences, Medical Sciences, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Physics, Plant Sciences, Biosciences, Psychology, architecture, industrial and all other science and engineering disciplines, food science, environmental science, agricultural engineering and all aspects of science and technology.

Medical technologies (technologies related to diagnosing, monitoring and treating, etc.)

Computer and information technologies (hardware, complex processing techniques, user interface technologies, networking technologies, software, web-based technologies, developing and maintaining databases, the Internet and web development, computer-aided design (CAD), engineering graphics and computer-aided engineering (CAE), data mining, etc.)

The role of reviewers in the peer review system includes evaluating the quality, validity and relevance of academic research. The purpose of the peer review process is to provide authors with constructive feedback from relevant experts who can be used to improve their work to ensure compliance with the highest possible standards.

 The Peer-Review Process Includes

• Invitation Letter to Review
• Accept Invitation Letter
• Review Manuscript Report
• Submit Review
• Only agree to review manuscripts for which they have the subject expertise required to carry out a proper assessment and which they can assess in a timely manner.
• Respect the confidentiality of peer review and not reveal any details of a manuscript or its review, during or after the peer-review process, beyond those that are released by the journal.

Double-check the manuscript title page and the Acknowledgments section to determine whether there is any conflict of interest for you (with the authors, their institution, or their funding sources) and whether you can judge the article impartially.

Abstract - Has this been provided (if required)? Does it adequately summarize the key findings/approach of the paper?

Length - Reviewers are asked to consider whether the content of a paper is of sufficient interest to justify its length. Each paper should be of the shortest length required to contain all useful and relevant information, and no longer.

Originality - Is the work relevant and novel? Does it contain significant additional material to that already published?

Presentation - Is the writing style clear and appropriate to the readership? Are any tables or graphics clear to read and labeled appropriately?

References - Does the paper contain the appropriate referencing to provide adequate context for the present work?

Once you've read the paper and have assessed its quality, you need to make a recommendation to the editor regarding publication. The specific decision types used by a journal may vary but the key decisions are:

Accept - If the paper is suitable for publication in its current form.

Minor revision - If the paper will be ready for publication after light revisions. Please list the revisions you would recommend the author makes.

Major revision - If the paper would benefit from substantial changes such as expanded data analysis, widening of the literature review, or rewriting sections of the text.

Reject - If the paper is not suitable for publication with this journal or if the revisions that would need to be undertaken are too fundamental for the submission to continue being considered in its current form.