Africa, an illustrious continent, is reading backwards growths and developments majorly—on facts of biased relationships the Western World has established with her. Plenty of unadulterated help given to Africa in return for extracting real products by Americans and Europeans is one of the reasons Africa cannot boast developmentally. If there are needs that equal relationships are built on between Africa and the rest of the continents of the world, there are plenty of ways Africa would meet up with good developmental indexes—with little or big help. It happens that African leaders keep praising and buying mercies from their counterparts in order to continue tormenting their citizens—especially the less privileged and physically challenged. Unfortunately, in return, American and European leaders have housed them in the middle of this ignominious discharge of service to their citizens. A lot is happening with deaf ears paid to. Even if African elites, intellectuals, human rights activists, and journalists deploy anomalies of their leaders to American, European, and Asian political leaders through their dedicated professional mediums, they don't see positive responses. All cries from depressed Africans are not attended to. Even as these continental leaders offer loans and other help to African states, they still can't verify what African leaders always do with the money. However, they keep borrowing from African leaders, and what they do with these loans is to share them among themselves, and when it is time to return those loans, they cut wages, labor, and salaries from the sufferings and works of working-class and poor Africans to settle loans. These leaders have refused to ask African leaders what they always deploy those loans on and why they couldn't see printable developments in Africa with all that help. These leaders need to ask African leaders why they are more comfortable with their households and properties in their continents than in Africa. On the surface of this, I think if these leaders want to have a balanced relationship that could help Africa, they should have an international monitoring team to check nations to verify what help given to them has amounted to. The United Nations monitoring team can help on this in Africa. Hence, there must be an international discipline team for international leaders that get loans and help without appropriate disbursement in their respective nations. Capital punishment must be initiated to correct victims. One of the reasons American, European, and Asian political leaders must not take poor Africans for granted is because they do all those products sent to various countries of the world. Yet, Africa has the biggest number of poor citizens. In fact, these leaders should ask African leaders why the continent is full of poor citizens despite their endless working and hard work, whereas few that don't work eat like pigs in Africa. More directly, they should ask African leaders why they are wealthier than them (American, European, and Asian political leaders), who always answer their representative calls and of whom they build and have developed or developing countries. Yet, they (African leaders) that have underdeveloped continents are richer than them. Until these anomalies are corrected and regulated by international working bodies of relationship, Africa will not have an equal relationship with the globe.

Americans, Europeans, and Asians have to come in similar terms of help to Africans. Note: Acknowledging equal help to one another would energize more constructive collaborations. Affirmatively, Africans process and produce most of the raw materials used globally, whereas the Western counterparts modify or process them into finished goods. However, Africans do produce some finished goods. But machineries are products of Western counterparts. That's why Westerners remain capital forces behind finished goods. Though, Africans are found in those industries producing finished goods globally. So, the fact that the African political system doesn’t welcome technological innovations to produce these goods doesn't make Africans less in a ranking box of finished productions. Hence, crediting one another opens more developmental channels. Cheating brings falling spirits. This must not be welcomed in the production stage or in production industries. So, compensation must come in handy so as to encourage workers. If it doesn't come directly to the citizens, African leaders will divert such compensations, as they are good at offering little or nothing to real builders of national values. Having to reach out to workers personally for rewards is a better practice to adopt in Africa by Western leaders. Again, acknowledging that both contribute to one another equally would not build laziness and less or no seriousness towards working. Acknowledging both contribute equally wouldn't invite spirits of trading with Africans as for likes for slavery. Whatever is done must be friendly reviewed and promoted. The system of government and other official institutions must be on similar pages. To this, Westerners must try to help shape and reshape educational and religious underscores to be the same or relatively the same as theirs. Just as Africans are poor at governing themselves, Westerners must serve as consultants to Africans in whatever Africans are doing that is in line with theirs. Honestly, doing things similarly helps for bigger developments and more peaceful and harmonious coexistence.

A high degree of African failures is linked to electoral malpractices. This doesn't allow citizens to choose stipulated candidates as political leaders assume public offices through self-imposition. Mind that unconnected and poor Africans are vulnerable to making choices of candidates due to do-or-die political participation in Africa. This, in the long run, allows nonentities to govern elites. Their fearless dispositions toward negative approaches to securing political positions have made elites fear contesting with them. This aside, a lot of dirty things involved in African politics is one of the leading reasons elites don't want to get involved in active politics. On this, helping the democratic system of Africa with democratic scores would make room for better developments within African states; hopefully, it would go on to regulate better relationships between Africa and the globe. On average, when helping poor Africans, whatever that has to do with their development should be community-based. In distributing palliatives, observing electoral processes, medical outreaches, and many more, Westerners should visit the helping centers for direct and personal consultations and supervisions. Because of the lack of technological advances in Africa that wouldn't allow Westerners to see through the lens how these helps are circulated in African communities, it should attract one of the reasons poor Africans are to be visited personally.

Following underdevelopment caused by careless political ideologies and representations of African leaders that have raised unbalanced relationships between Africa and international relations, Western leaders are compelled to decisively punish their African counterparts so the world experiences more rapid growth and development, which again would help with regulatory relationships. Western leaders should know that most African leaders are only good at manipulations. They offer nothing aside from that. All their riches are circulated overseas. So, if there could be an international disciplinary team to forfeit all those materialisms in order to use them for African development, especially in the area of science and technology, it would be of great and global benefit. Africa's agricultural sector doesn't need much help; rather, transportation of African goods and services is to be supported. That's where there is an issue, including agricultural machinery. There should be a regulatory board that would mandate their children to take some levels of education in African states before moving them to global institutions. This would at least make their children acquainted with African ways of life—this makes them govern relatively Africa as their parents enriched them with African wealth, and whenever their parents put them as successors, they should be able to get familiar with how to govern Africa. This option is not good. But African leaders see it as abominable to govern rightly or democratically. Therefore, poor Africans wouldn't pray well for them. And western leaders should help poor Africans do retaliation or punishment. However, how can the Westerners help the world for the better? It is by assisting poor Africans in getting comfort ability, and invariably, this increases the level of production in Africa, because poor Africans are the forces behind the production of goods and services that make good pointers to the world. African leaders do nothing aside from embezzling and extorting African natural resources. So, punishing them would restore sanity and greater labor from Africa—this is only for global progressions and a good legacy to promote the Africa-global relationship.

Exponentially, every move to strengthen the balanced relationship between Africa and the globe is very paramount, historic, developmental, and governable. Because there wouldn't be a better world when a continent hosted by agricultural milestones is not supported and promoted. There wouldn't be a better world when the continents hosted by scientific and technological innovations and milestones are not supported and promoted. Together, there wouldn't be a world when science, technology, and agriculture are not supported and promoted—the very powerhouses of the universe—whereas religion, tradition, and arts beautify the universe. And learning and training strengthen hard work. To this end, a balanced relationship between Africa and the globe is needed for advancements in all ramifications.