Man should not concur with the situations of a state. Man’s primary duty is to shape and modify situations to prevailing presence of the masses. It is a well-doing fact to eradicate malfunctioning elements in a state without fear of losing a membership seat of colleagues. That is a direct and cheapest way of building everlasting legacies that even time and other wonders of the world can't attempt to defeat. And, unfortunately, if a decorated member of a state is engaged with impurities within the circles of a state, nothing is best compared to than the hell, which every suffocating element is relatively addressed to. If the conscious men fail to stand against means of corruptions which is proportional parameters to govern badly in a state, the state dies in the middle of saints - whereas, the saints transformed into devils unconditionally and unconventionally - the greatest showcase of ignorance in a stand for unrepentant format. Acknowledging this, a state is a hell in a face of total package of components of revivals without underlying conditions. Additionally, there is a means of social stratification due to educational level, but, in learning, we have system of humanity. No one can have more than another. Even if a single language is adopted in a nation, the success is not fully guarantee as long as religion and education are available. Hence, only when learning is taken more than education and humanity is taken more than religion, we can't have a true democratic system of living which is best handled within a state of a man and the society.

The colour of foolishness orchestrated by religion mannerisms have plugged a state into glitch of confusions; though, exclaimed by ruthless engagements of idiots. This is why, a state governs by manipulators and hosted by fools, is a place earmarked for extreme and endless sufferings. Man shouldn't be a slave to religion and politics. If this happens, a society becomes a refugee camp for people in lower class. Materialisms are sequencing indicators of a rich state and productive mannerisms initiate equilibrium of transaction.

Naturally, man is the controller of a state. Unadulterated conditions like incorrectness of flow of natural resources to befit individually rightly and equally credited issuance of governable mind by well-organized and basically-oriented people within a sphere of a society to lead population into equitable demand. However, if the wise among the intelligent citizens are not allowed and opportune to govern, then, politics is on reigns. And, the prime factors to this effect are religion and ethnicity. Because, this is what establishes favoritism in the course of governance. How possibly this is exempted, man should have been a total package of possible and positive transformational being in a society. But, on the acknowledgement of this, fundamental politicking is adhered to balance rulership and leadership demands.

In a society where norms and cultures are not morally-inclined, every part of government constitution is morally-disabled and such state is as dangerous as a vampire-camp. On great wickedness pills, politicians feed upon - a society that supposed to be governed by men of wisdom (pure elders) would be governed by politicians (immature men of wisdom; such as kids, bitterly-inclined individuals and all types of reckless individuals in a society). This makes a society suffer lots in piloting meaningful and reasonable affairs as some issues not suitable to be handled by anyhow people, when treated without consulting numerous right demands, makes a society ungovernable.

Man, in an attempt to disregard and revolutionized laid down constitution of a state, is making everything possible to build a government of questions as men are sidelined in the course of reviews. Because, by singlehandedly touching something established by wise elders of the society on a reason of satisfying personal desires, the governance is lopsided. And the collapse of such reign is typically harmful, and venerable to total attack - within and outside. This is the reason; a man shouldn't be above what he has judiciously initiated. The best way to solve this, is by putting self-available for agreed guidelines of a society. Constitution can only be revisited when it is obvious that, the interpreters and initiators of the laws have become tyrants in discharging citizens-oriented works. So, just as the common citizens' lives can better are advocacies for exclusive inclusions of the constitution. And as that is done, acts, sections and sub-sections of constitution should be erased for some critical things that shouldn't get mercies as few things are too vulnerable and dangerous if mercies are attended to. Because, it is usually and likable to get repeated. So, actions that can cause absolute destructions of a family and society is not good for bail-terms which is the first component of sub-sections entry of a constitution.

Nothing kills a state faster than overlooking pointers of destructions like keeping mute in presence of crisis and a formidable act of resilience in defending the criminals on any touch. Civil Society Groups and the individual rights activists are solely responsible for silencing issues that can attract national and international protests. If tribalism and perspective difference can cause such, there may be a need to regrouping and restrategizing in order to meet requirements of moment before pressing for reunion after scenery. Again, if the corrupt minds - be it leaders and citizens, must be captured or killed before a stable governable atmosphere, better that is done to avoid expansion of such seeds in a society trying all things to make sure there is emergence of beautiful growths and developments. However, everyone is going to die. So, if all attempts to correct and change such people is far from achieving, they can be cut so that others see reasons to avoid that. Hence, a great and grave sacrifices for great revolutions.

Man, and politics is the total package of a society - just as religion is the total package of man's believes and a sign-post of uniformity. These three main components of a society: man, politics and religion are regulated on activisms for possible and positive growths and developments in the society. These fosters of a society are regulated and relegated by desires. Man, as the first and last pillar of a society holds it ultimately on how his desires disrespect and respect environmental factors facilitating moves of national appropriations. Everything under the control of an ignorant man is dangerous; everything under the control of an intelligent man is secured; everything under the control of a wise man is productive. This is the reason, desires of humans’ shape and reshape societies on different formats and understanding. So, if understanding and knowledge is far from the corners of abled men in a society, the society is on a stage of collapse. Because, things are liable to produce characters of choices and not for the society. Therefore, until man, politics and religion are welcomed on progressive activisms with attractive workings based on dividends of underlined, the ego of a man over politics and religion would disrupt social workings of environmental factors. And, until the politics honours demanding grounds, man is useless in the course of correlating with religion to set standards of politics. And, until the religion aligns with desires of a man in regards to politics, religion become a threat in a society. Together upon this, confusions, ignorance, knowledge and understanding are managed as expected.

Man’s instinct is to dominate. The society is vulnerable in the middle of man's decisions. So, shapes and reshapes of a society is traceable to man's desiring-box. It is therefore a wrong code to laying total blames of societal collapses on politics and religion. Hearts of men are controllers of the society. Politics and religion have only served as prevailing workings to manage and manipulate a society. How politics and religion changes men's hearts depend on laid down constitutions and doctrines. That's why, good elders and ancestors are roots of good societies. Men, who are not founding fathers of certain places have no full involvement of a disruptive innovations and atmospheres of a society. But, desires to bisect favourable and doctrinal rituals can be served as badies of such men in a society. Contrarily, man changes politics and religion so easily within minimum challenges and efforts. Because, everything is at control of a man. Hence, man is a product of a society and a society is a product for men. So, if men are good, politics and religion have no options than becoming good and thereby plugging societies into desirable rooms. To this, men are always advocated for good characters. Citizens should be more careful on how to raise and support good people than crying of changing or transiting system of governments. And, men are always encouraged to subscribe to good tidings in order to have productive generations and to get ready for dividends of posterity.