Association Between Obesity and Alcohol Consumption in the Working-Age Population in Yugawara Town, Japan: A Cross-Sectional Study

Kurasawa R, Kotagiri M, Watanabe K, Watanabe Y and Hirota R

Published on: 2024-12-04

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between obesity and alcohol consumption among young adults in Yugawara Town, Japan. Using data from a health and dietary education survey, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 366 participants aged 19–39 years. Participants were categorized into normal weight (BMI 18.5–24.9) and overweight/obese (BMI ≥25). Logistic regression analysis revealed significant associations between obesity and low frequency of alcohol consumption, high alcohol intake per occasion, poor self-reported health, fast eating speed, and stress-related coping issues. The findings suggest the need for targeted health promotion interventions to address obesity and alcohol-related behaviors.

Keywords

Obesity; Alcohol consumption; Working-Age population; Lifestyle behaviors; Cross-Sectional study

Introduction

 

Approximately 80% of deaths in Japan are attributed to lifestyle-related diseases, including obesity. According to the 2019 National Health and Nutrition Survey conducted by the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, the prevalence of obesity (BMI ≥25 kg/m²) ranges from 30.1% to 33.0% in men and 19.5% to 22.3% in women, with a notable increase in men between 2013 and 2019 [1]. Excess weight is a major risk factor for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer.

Obesity-related behaviors, including alcohol consumption, drinking frequency, eating speed, physical inactivity, and psychological stress, are extensively studied [2-6]. While some studies suggest a positive correlation between alcohol consumption and obesity, others report no association, particularly among moderate drinkers with healthier lifestyles [7-9]. However, data on the relationship between alcohol consumption and obesity among young adults in Japan, especially in local settings like Yugawara Town, is limited.

The present study investigates the relationship between obesity and lifestyle behaviors, focusing on alcohol consumption, among working-age adults (19–39 years) in Yugawara Town. This study aims to provide evidence for the development of tailored health promotion strategies.

Methods

Study Design

This cross-sectional study was based on data from a health and dietary education survey conducted in Yugawara Town, Kanagawa Prefecture, between February and March 2015. Questionnaires were mailed to 1,355 residents aged 19–39 years, achieving a response rate of 29.0% (393 questionnaires returned). Participant recruitment was conducted using family registry information to ensure that all recipients were within the defined age range of 19–39 years. Although some respondents did not provide their date of birth, their eligibility within the specified age range was confirmed using the family registry data. Consequently, these respondents were included in the analysis.

Survey Items

The questionnaire comprised 34 items covering demographics, BMI, nutrition, exercise, mental health, smoking, alcohol consumption, and dental health. Participants with incomplete height or weight data were excluded, leaving 366 responses for analysis. Missing values were excluded from individual analyses.

Study Groups

BMI was calculated as weight (kg) divided by the square of height (m²). Participants with a BMI <18.5 (n = 46) were excluded from the analysis. The remaining participants were categorized as either normal weight (BMI 18.5–24.9, n = 267) or overweight/obese (BMI ≥25, n = 53). (Fig.1)

Statistical Analysis

Student’s t-test was used to compare continuous variables, while Fisher’s exact test was applied to categorical variables. Missing data were addressed using pairwise deletion, and only available data for the relevant variables were included in each analysis to maximize the use of information. Binary logistic regression was performed to evaluate associations between obesity and independent variables, with adjustments for age and sex. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were conducted using EZR version 1.61 [10].

Ethical Considerations

This study was conducted as part of the "Yuttari Yugawara 'Healthy and Happy Life Plan'," a public health initiative implemented by Yugawara Town. The purpose of the initiative is to promote health and improve nutritional education among residents. As the data collection was performed under this government-led program, individual informed consent was not required in accordance with the applicable legal framework.

To ensure privacy and confidentiality, all data were anonymized prior to analysis, making it impossible to identify individual participants. Since this study was part of routine public health activities and did not involve interventions or treatments beyond standard practices, it was not subject to institutional ethical review, in line with national guidelines.

Results

Participant Characteristics (Table 1)

BMI into normal-weight and overweight/obese groups. Among the 267 participants in the normal-weight group, 39.7% were male, while 62.3% of the 53 participants in the overweight/obese group were male (p = 0.004). The mean body weight and height were significantly higher in the overweight/obese group compared to the normal-weight group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.010, respectively). Self-reported health status differed notably between the groups, with 72.3% of normal-weight participants rating their health as good or very good, compared to 58.5% in the overweight/obese group (p = 0.001).

Table 1: Participant Characteristics.

Variable

Eligible N

Normal Weight N (SD/%)

Eligible N

Overweight/Obese N (SD/%)

p-value

Sex (Male)

267

106 (39.7%)

53

33 (62.3%)

0.004 b

Age (years) (Mean ± SD)

240

30.1 ± 5.9

50

31.4 ± 5.6

0.177 a

Height (cm) (Mean ± SD)

267

163.9 ± 8.8

53

167.3 ± 9.4

0.010 a

Body Weight (kg) (Mean ± SD)

267

57.4 ± 8.6

53

80.6 ± 13.7

<0.001 a

Living Arrangements

 

 

 

 

 

Living alone, N (%)

266

28 (10.5%)

53

3 (5.7%)

0.444 b

Living with others, N (%)

 

238 (89.5%)

 

50 (94.3%)

 

Self-reported Health Status

 

 

 

 

 

Very healthy, N (%)

267

51 (19.1%)

53

7 (13.2%)

0.001 b

Fair to good health, N (%)

 

193 (72.3%)

 

31 (58.5%)

 

Rather unhealthy, N (%)

 

17 (6.4%)

 

13 (24.5%)

 

Not healthy, N (%)

 

6 (2.2%)

 

2 (3.8%)

 

Desired Body Weight

 

 

 

 

 

Want to lose a lot of weight, N (%)

267

43 (16.1%)

52

35 (67.3%)

<0.001 b

Want to lose some weight, N (%)

 

146 (54.7%)

 

17 (32.7%)

 

Satisfied with current weight, N (%)

 

66 (24.7%)

 

0 (0.0%)

 

Want to gain weight, N (%)

 

12 (4.5%)

 

0 (0.0%)

 

Health Check-up (within one year)

 

 

 

 

 

At work, N (%)

267

128 (47.9%)

53

35 (66.0%)

0.048 b

At a school health screening, N (%)

 

24 (9.0%)

 

0 (0.0%)

 

At a city health check, N (%)

 

3 (1.1%)

 

0 (0.0%)

 

At a private medical facility, N (%)

 

27 (10.1%)

 

4 (7.5%)

 

Did not receive a check-up, N (%)

 

85 (31.8%)

 

14 (26.4%)

 

Breakfast Frequency

 

 

 

 

 

Every day, N (%)

264

176 (66.7%)

53

35 (66.0%)

0.288 b

Skip breakfast 1-3 days/week, N (%)

 

43 (16.3%)

 

5 (9.4%)

 

Skip breakfast 4-5 days/week, N (%)

 

13 (4.9%)

 

2 (3.8%)

 

Never eat breakfast, N (%)

 

32 (12.2%)

 

11 (20.8%)

 

Breakfast Companions

 

 

 

 

 

With family, N (%)

227

39 (17.2%)

39

5 (12.8%)

0.761 b

Alone, N (%)

 

99 (43.6%)

 

21 (53.8%)

 

Variable

Eligible N

Normal Weight N (SD/%)

Eligible N

Overweight/Obese N (SD/%)

p-value

Dinner Companions

 

 

 

 

 

With family, N (%)

265

86 (32.5%)

52

21 (40.4%)

0.067 b

Not all together but eating with family, N (%)

 

104 (39.2%)

 

13 (25.0%)

 

Alone, N (%)

 

49 (18.5%)

 

12 (23.1%)

 

Alone (due to living alone), N (%)

 

25 (9.4%)

 

4 (7.7%)

 

No dinner companions, N (%)

 

1 (0.4%)

 

2 (3.8%)

 

Eating Speed

 

 

 

 

 

Very slow, N (%)

267

5 (1.9%)

52

1 (1.9%)

0.073 b

Slightly slow, N (%)

 

28 (10.5%)

 

2 (3.8%)

 

Normal speed, N (%)

 

89 (33.3%)

 

11 (21.2%)

 

Slightly fast, N (%)

 

105 (39.3%)

 

24 (46.2%)

 

Very fast, N (%)

 

40 (15.0%)

 

14 (26.9%)

 

Frequency of Exercise

 

 

 

 

 

5 days/week or more, N (%)

265

15 (5.7%)

53

2 (3.8%)

0.003 b

3-4 days/week, N (%)

 

31 (11.7%)

 

5 (9.4%)

 

1-2 days/week, N (%)

 

33 (12.5%)

 

18 (34.0%)

 

2-3 days/month, N (%)

 

36 (13.6%)

 

8 (15.1%)

 

Less than 1 day/month, N (%)

 

13 (4.9%)

 

5 (9.4%)

 

No exercise at all, N (%)

 

134 (50.6%)

 

15 (28.3%)

 

Unable to exercise due to health issues, N (%)

 

3 (1.1%)

 

0 (0.0%)

 

Stress Management

 

 

 

 

 

Well-managed, N (%)

263

42 (16.0%)

53

4 (7.5%)

0.099 b

Managed, N (%)

 

143 (54.4%)

 

25 (47.2%)

 

Poorly managed, N (%)

 

62 (23.6%)

 

18 (34.0%)

 

Not managed at all, N (%)

 

16 (6.1%)

 

6 (11.3%)

 

Alcohol Consumption Frequency

 

 

 

 

 

Every day, N (%)

265

35 (13.2%)

52

4 (7.7%)

0.734 b

3 or more days/week, N (%)

 

25 (9.4%)

 

3 (5.8%)

 

1 day/week, N (%)

 

53 (20.0%)

 

10 (19.2%)

 

Rarely drink, N (%)

 

76 (28.7%)

 

17 (32.7%)

 

Former drinker, N (%)

 

6 (2.3%)

 

2 (3.8%)

 

Non-drinker, N (%)

 

70 (26.4%)

 

16 (30.8%)

 

Alcohol Intake Amount

 

 

 

 

 

Less than 22.1g, N (%)

117

59 (50.4%)

17

5 (29.4%)

0.181 b

22.1-44.3g, N (%)

 

34 (29.1%)

 

5 (29.4%)

 

44.3-66.4g, N (%)

 

11 (9.4%)

 

3 (17.6%)

 

66.4g or more, N (%)

 

13 (11.1%)

 

4 (23.5%)

 

Bold values indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).

ª Student’s t-test was used for mean ± SD (normal weight vs overweight/obese).

? Fisher’s test was used for n (%).

Lifestyle behaviors also varied. Overweight/obese participants demonstrated faster eating speeds and reported higher alcohol consumption per occasion than their normal-weight counterparts. Regarding breakfast habits, the majority in both groups ate breakfast daily; however, a higher percentage of overweight/obese individuals skipped breakfast more frequently. Additionally, overweight/obese participants were less likely to exercise regularly (p = 0.003) and exhibited a higher prevalence of stress management difficulties, with only 7.5% reporting well-managed stress compared to 16.0% in the normal-weight group (p = 0.099).

These findings highlight significant behavioral and health differences between normal-weight and overweight/obese individuals, emphasizing the need for tailored interventions targeting lifestyle factors.

Logistic Regression Analysis

Table 2 presents the results of binomial logistic regression analysis identifying factors associated with obesity. Significant associations were observed between obesity and the following factors: feeling unhealthy based on self-reported health status (Adjusted OR = 3.76, 95% CI: 1.72–8.20, p < 0.001), fast eating speed (Adjusted OR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.09–4.37, p = 0.028), inability to manage anxiety or stress (Adjusted OR = 2.33, 95% CI: 1.24–4.40, p = 0.009), abstaining from or infrequent alcohol consumption (Adjusted OR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.08–4.29, p = 0.029), and consuming more than two alcoholic drinks per occasion (Adjusted OR = 3.84, 95% CI: 1.14–12.90, p = 0.030). Other variables, including family structure, desire to gain weight, lack of health checkups, skipping breakfast, and eating alone, showed no significant association with obesity.

Table 2: Binomial Logistic Regression Analysis.

Variable (Exposure)

Adjusted OR

95% CI

p-value

Family Structure (small family size)

2.68

(0.59–12.20)

0.203

Self-reported health condition (feeling unhealthy)

3.76

(1.72–8.20)

<0.001

Desire to gain weight

0

(0.00–Inf)

0.988

No health checkups

0.87

(0.43–1.74)

0.683

Skipping breakfast

0.89

(0.46–1.73)

0.727

Eating breakfast alone

1.48

(0.69–3.19)

0.312

Eating dinner alone

1.08

(0.53–2.18)

0.833

Fast eating speed

2.18

(1.09–4.37)

0.028

Exercise frequency (≥1–2 days/week)

1.94

(1.02–3.68)

0.043

Inability to manage anxiety or stress

2.33

(1.24–4.40)

0.009

Infrequent or abstinent alcohol consumption

2.16

(1.08–4.29)

0.029

Alcohol consumption (more than 2 drinks per occasion)

3.84

(1.14–12.90)

0.03

OR: Odds Ratio.

Adjusted OR: Adjusted for sex and age.

Bold values indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).

Table 3 displays crude odds ratios (ORs) for the frequency of alcohol consumption in relation to obesity. Among all participants, individuals who consumed alcohol infrequently (1 day/week) or abstained from drinking showed higher odds of obesity compared to those who consumed alcohol ≥3 days/week, with ORs of 1.79 (95% CI: 0.74–4.35) and 2.03 (95% CI: 0.80–5.18), respectively. While these trends were not statistically significant overall (p for trend = 0.159), subgroup analysis revealed significant associations for men (p for trend = 0.038). Specifically, men who abstained from drinking had an OR of 3.75 (95% CI: 1.05–13.30), indicating a significantly higher likelihood of obesity compared to frequent drinkers. No significant trends were observed among women (p for trend = 0.724).

Table 3: Crude Odds Ratios for Alcohol Consumption Frequency by Subgroups.


Subgroup

≥3 days/week (Reference)

1 day/week

None

p for trend

Overall

1

1.79 (0.74–4.35)

2.03 (0.80–5.18)

0.159

n

67

156

94

 

Men

1

2.55 (0.79–8.23)

3.75 (1.05–13.30)

0.038

n

34

71

33

 

Women

1

1.18 (0.30–4.67)

1.30 (0.31–5.38)

0.724

n

33

85

61

 

OR: Odds Ratio.

95% CI: 95% Confidence Interval.

Bold values indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).

Table 4 presents crude odds ratios (ORs) for the amount of alcohol consumption per occasion in relation to obesity. Compared to individuals consuming less than 22.1g of alcohol per occasion, those consuming 44.3g or more demonstrated higher odds of obesity. Among all participants, the ORs were 1.74 (95% CI: 0.47–6.43) for <44.3g, 3.22 (95% CI: 0.67–15.50) for <66.4g, and 3.63 (95% CI: 0.86–15.40) for ≥66.4g, with a significant trend (p for trend = 0.044). Subgroup analysis showed no significant associations among men (p for trend = 0.544). However, among women, a significant trend was observed (p for trend = 0.016), suggesting that increasing alcohol consumption per occasion may be associated with a higher likelihood of obesity in women.

Table 4: Crude Odds Ratios for Alcohol Consumption Amount by Subgroups.

Subgroup

<22.1g (Reference)

<44.3g (95% CI)

<66.4g (95% CI)

≥66.4g (95% CI)

p for trend

Overall

1

1.74 (0.47–6.43)

3.22 (0.67–15.50)

3.63 (0.86–15.40)

0.044

n

64

39

14

17

 

Men

1

0.81 (0.17–3.87)

2.30 (0.33–16.20)

1.38 (0.28–6.92)

0.544

n

28

20

6

13

 

Women

1

-

-

-

0.016

n

36

19

8

4

 

OR: Odds Ratio.

95% CI: 95% Confidence Interval.

Bold values indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).

Discussion

This study investigated the relationship between obesity and lifestyle factors, particularly alcohol consumption, among the working-age population in Yugawara Town, Japan. The findings revealed significant associations between obesity and infrequent alcohol consumption, high alcohol intake per occasion, poor self-reported health, fast eating speed, and difficulties in managing stress. These results highlight the complex interactions between behavioral and psychological factors contributing to obesity, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions.

Alcohol Consumption and Obesity

The study identified a dual association between alcohol consumption patterns and obesity. Participants who abstained from or consumed alcohol infrequently were at a higher risk of obesity compared to those who consumed alcohol ≥3 days/week. This trend was particularly significant among men, where those who abstained had an OR of 3.75 (95% CI: 1.05–13.30, p = 0.038) compared to frequent drinkers. Conversely, excessive alcohol intake per occasion (≥44.3g) was significantly associated with increased odds of obesity, especially in women (p for trend = 0.016). These results align with prior studies suggesting that excessive alcohol consumption contributes to weight gain by increasing caloric intake, stimulating appetite, and impairing lipid metabolism [11, 12]. Moreover, the findings support the Japanese Ministry of Health’s guideline recommending moderate alcohol consumption (≤20 grams/day) to maintain a balanced diet and healthy lifestyle [13].

Self-Reported Health and Obesity

Participants with poor self-reported health were more likely to be obese, with an adjusted OR of 3.76 (95% CI: 1.72–8.20, p < 0.001). This aligns with findings from the Yugawara Town Health Promotion Plan, which indicated lower health awareness among residents during adolescence and a decline in health status with age [14]. The association between obesity and poor health awareness underscores the importance of promoting health literacy and encouraging proactive health behaviors to prevent obesity and related conditions.

Eating Speed and Obesity

Fast eating speed was significantly associated with obesity (Adjusted OR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.09–4.37, p = 0.028). This finding is consistent with previous research suggesting that rapid eating disrupts satiety signaling by reducing the time required for gastrointestinal hormone secretion, leading to overeating (15, 16). Promoting slower eating and mindful eating practices, such as thorough chewing and increased awareness of food intake, could serve as effective strategies to address obesity.

Stress and Obesity

Difficulties in managing stress were also significantly associated with obesity (Adjusted OR = 2.33, 95% CI: 1.24–4.40, p = 0.009). Stress is known to alter food choices, often increasing preference for high-fat, energy-dense foods, while simultaneously reducing physical activity(6). Stress-induced changes in eating habits and energy expenditure may exacerbate unhealthy behaviors, contributing to weight gain. Implementing stress management programs and addressing the interplay between stress and eating behaviors may help mitigate the risk of obesity. Further research is required to explore these relationships in greater detail.

Limitations

This study has several limitations. As an anonymous, self-administered survey, it may be subject to recall bias, particularly for self-reported height and weight, which are often over- or underreported depending on BMI status. The cross-sectional design precludes establishing causal relationships between obesity and associated factors. Furthermore, the study is geographically limited to adolescents in Yugawara Town, Kanagawa Prefecture, and the findings may not be generalizable to other regions or age groups. Additionally, the questionnaire lacked detailed dietary information, such as food quantity and nutritional content, which should be incorporated in future research to provide a more comprehensive analysis.

Conclusion

This study highlights the multifactorial nature of obesity, identifying significant associations with alcohol consumption patterns, self-reported health, eating speed, and stress management difficulties. The findings underscore the importance of tailored interventions targeting these lifestyle factors to address obesity. Promoting moderate alcohol consumption, improving health literacy, encouraging mindful eating, and implementing stress management strategies are critical for effective obesity prevention. Future studies should explore the causal pathways linking these factors to obesity and consider a broader geographic and demographic scope to validate the findings.

COI: There is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. The National Health and Nutrition Survey (NHNS) Japan. 2020.
  2. Hurst Y, Fukuda H. Effects of changes in eating speed on obesity in patients with diabetes: a secondary analysis of longitudinal health check-up data. BMJ Open. 2018; 8: e019589.
  3. Kirihara Y. MHe. Association of Clinical Laboratory Data with Drinking and Smoking Habits by Age Group (in Japanese). The 55th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Association for Rural Medicine. 2006; 55: 252.
  4. Shimoshikiryo I, Ibusuki R, Shimatani K, Nishimoto D, Takezaki T, Nishida Y, et al. Association between alcohol intake pattern and metabolic syndrome components and simulated change by alcohol intake reduction: A cross-sectional study from the Japan Multi-Institutional Collaborative Cohort Study. Alcohol. 2020; 89: 129-138.
  5. Morita Y, Ohta M, Inoue T, Honda T, Konno Y, Eguchi Y, et al. Sense of coherence is significantly associated with both metabolic syndrome and lifestyle in Japanese computer software office workers. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2014; 27: 967-979.
  6. Moore CJ, Cunningham SA. Social position, psychological stress, and obesity: a systematic review. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012; 112: 518-526.
  7. Booranasuksakul U, Singhato A, Rueangsri N, Prasertsri P. Association between Alcohol Consumption and Body Mass Index in University Students. Asian Pac Isl Nurs J. 2019; 4: 57-65.
  8. Kim BY, Nam H, Yoo JJ, Cho YY, Choi DH, Jung CH, et al. Association between alcohol consumption status and obesity-related comorbidities in men: data from the 2016 Korean community health survey. BMC Public Health. 2021; 21: 733.
  9. Traversy G, Chaput JP. Alcohol Consumption and Obesity: An Update. Curr Obes Rep. 2015; 4: 122-130.
  10. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013; 48: 452-458.
  11. Eiler WJ, 2nd, Dzemidzic M, Case KR, Soeurt CM, Armstrong CL, Mattes RD, et al. The aperitif effect: Alcohol's effects on the brain's response to food aromas in women. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015; 23: 1386-1393.
  12. Moriles KE, Azer SA. Alanine Amino Transferase. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2023, StatPearls Publishing LLC.; 2023.
  13. Ministry of Health, and Labour and Welfare. Health Japan 21 (the second term). 2000.
  14. Yugawara Town Welfare Department Health Center. Yutari Yugawara Healthy Plan (Yugawara Town Health Promotion Plan/Food Education Promotion Plan). 2023 Feb17 access,Yugawara Town.
  15. Garciduenas-Fimbres TE, Paz-Graniel I, Nishi SK, Salas-Salvado J, Babio N. Eating Speed, Eating Frequency, and Their Relationships with Diet Quality, Adiposity, and Metabolic Syndrome, or Its Components. Nutrients. 2021; 13: 1687.
  16. Ohkuma T, Hirakawa Y, Nakamura U, Kiyohara Y, Kitazono T, Ninomiya T. Association between eating rate and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes (Lond). 2015; 39: 1589-1596.