From a geostrategic perspective, Nicaragua’s significance extends beyond mere geography. Under the leadership of Daniel Ortega, the country's foreign policy has increasingly aligned with global blocs opposed to the U.S.-led liberal order. Deepening cooperation with China, Russia, Iran, and Venezuela has positioned Nicaragua as one of the central anti-U.S. actors in Latin America. This alignment is evident in its international stances and participation in forums where it often sides with resistance movements against U.S. hegemony.

Nicaragua has also sought to legitimize its regional ambitions through soft power strategies, utilizing cultural and media institutions aligned with the state to reinforce its ideological stance. Furthermore, its support for anti-neoliberal and leftist movements has strengthened its ties with the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America (ALBA), helping consolidate its role as a political ally of like-minded governments in the region. In this regard, Nicaragua has carved out a unique niche within Latin America’s evolving geopolitical landscape, positioning itself as a strategic actor within an alternative regional order.

Nevertheless, Nicaragua’s geostrategic and geopolitical status is not without challenges. Economic constraints imposed by U.S. and EU sanctions have diminished the country's logistical and infrastructural capacity. Internally, political repression, civil unrest, and democratic backsliding have tarnished its international image and undermined its geopolitical legitimacy. Additionally, environmental crises such as climate change, droughts, and widespread forest fires have weakened the country’s resilience and diminished its ability to effectively assert itself in regional dynamics.

In sum, Nicaragua’s geostrategic and geopolitical positioning emerges from a complex interplay of natural geography, political ideology, foreign alliances, and regional dynamics. While the country seeks to capitalize on its strategic location and pursue an independent foreign policy, its long-term effectiveness in doing so depends on resolving internal tensions, enhancing multilateral engagement, and investing in political and economic infrastructure.

This article employs a critical geopolitical framework to analyze Nicaragua’s strategic position within the Latin American regional order. It examines the role of global and regional powers, Nicaragua’s strategic interactions, and the challenges and opportunities that define its foreign policy posture. The findings suggest that despite current international pressures and domestic issues, Nicaragua retains the potential to become a key player in the geopolitical future of Latin America, particularly if it successfully leverages its geography and ideological alliances.

Nicaragua, a relatively small Central American state, occupies a disproportionately significant position in the geopolitical and geostrategic landscape of Latin America. With its unique geographic location, spanning both the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean, Nicaragua serves as a potential strategic hub for maritime transit, energy routes, and regional integration. Its central location on the isthmus connecting North and South America places it at the crossroads of continental dynamics, making it a key focus for both regional and extra-regional powers such as the United States, China, and Russia [1]. The competition among global powers for influence in Nicaragua underscores the importance of understanding its evolving geopolitical role and the strategic imperatives that arise from its geography, political alignments, and foreign policy choices.

The geopolitical significance of Nicaragua is deeply rooted in its physical geography. Historically, the country was considered a potential site for an interoceanic canal, even before the construction of the Panama Canal. Although the Nicaraguan Canal project—especially in its latest incarnation supported by Chinese investment—has not materialized, the possibility of such infrastructure continues to feed geopolitical calculations and perceptions of strategic value [2]. This potential has made Nicaragua a theater for infrastructure diplomacy and a locus of foreign investment and interventionist ambitions.

Beyond geography, Nicaragua's political orientation has amplified its geopolitical relevance. Since the return to power of President Daniel Ortega in 2007, the country has adopted a foreign policy that resists U.S. dominance and increasingly aligns with alternative power centers. Ortega’s government has fostered strong relations with countries such as Venezuela, Cuba, Russia, and more recently, the People’s Republic of China—especially after the diplomatic shift from Taiwan to Beijing in 2021 [3]. These alignments reflect not only ideological affinities but also strategic maneuvering within a multipolar international system. Nicaragua, in this regard, exemplifies how smaller states can leverage global rivalries to assert autonomy and maximize geopolitical gains.

At the regional level, Nicaragua plays a complex and sometimes contradictory role. It is both a member of Central American integration mechanisms—such as the Central American Integration System (SICA)—and a close ally of the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America (ALBA), which represents a more radical, anti-neoliberal bloc. This dual positioning allows Nicaragua to operate within the formal frameworks of regional cooperation while simultaneously projecting ideological solidarity with revolutionary movements [4]. However, this strategy has also generated tensions, particularly with neighboring countries like Costa Rica and with regional organizations concerned about democratic backsliding and human rights violations.

The domestic political landscape of Nicaragua also feeds into its geopolitical identity. The suppression of protests in 2018, the imprisonment of opposition figures, and increasing authoritarianism have led to international condemnation and the imposition of sanctions by the United States and the European Union [5]. These developments have further entrenched the Ortega government’s anti-Western discourse and pushed the country closer to alternative global actors. Thus, Nicaragua’s internal political trajectory cannot be separated from its broader geopolitical posture.

In the broader context of Latin America, Nicaragua’s strategic value is magnified by shifting regional dynamics. As U.S. influence in the region is increasingly contested, and as China and Russia expand their economic and security footprints, Nicaragua has emerged as a symbolic and material arena of strategic competition. China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), Russia’s military diplomacy, and Iran’s soft-power engagement all intersect in Nicaragua, making it a key node in global geopolitical reconfigurations [6]. At the same time, Nicaragua’s proximity to the United States and its location along major drug trafficking routes give it critical importance in hemispheric security and migration policy debates.

This article aims to analyze the geostrategic and geopolitical position of Nicaragua within Latin America by adopting a critical geopolitical framework. It investigates how geography, ideology, foreign alignments, and regional integration shape Nicaragua’s international posture. The central argument is that while Nicaragua faces internal challenges and international pressure, it continues to use its strategic location and political alliances to exert influence within a contested regional order. By examining these dynamics, the study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of how smaller states navigate and shape geopolitical landscapes in the Global South.

This study employs a qualitative research approach grounded in descriptive-analytical methods. Data has been gathered through the review of academic literature, official documents, policy reports, and geopolitical analyses related to Nicaragua’s strategic positioning. The research is framed by critical geopolitics, focusing on how spatial narratives, political alignments, and external influences shape Nicaragua’s regional role. Through case-based analysis and interpretive evaluation, the study aims to uncover the interplay between geography, ideology, and foreign policy in determining Nicaragua’s geopolitical and geostrategic significance within Latin America.

Theoretical Framework

Understanding the geostrategic and geopolitical position of Nicaragua in Latin America requires the application of theoretical frameworks that explain the link between geography, power, foreign policy, and regional/global rivalries. This study draws on three key theoretical approaches: classical geopolitics, geostrategy within the context of great power competition, and critical geopolitics. These frameworks, when used in combination, enable a multi-dimensional analysis of Nicaragua’s spatial positioning, foreign policy behavior, and interaction with regional and global actors.

Classical Geopolitics and the Significance of Geographic Location

Classical geopolitics focuses on how geography influences political power. Foundational thinkers such as Friedrich Ratzel, Halford Mackinder, Alfred Mahan, and Nicholas Spykman emphasized geography as a determinant in global politics and national security [7].

Halford Mackinder’s "Heartland Theory" posits that control over key geographical areas leads to global dominance [8]. While this theory primarily referred to Eurasia, its core idea—that geography and strategic control are linked—applies to Nicaragua’s position as a potential geopolitical pivot. Situated at the heart of Central America, with access to both the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, Nicaragua occupies a location that could serve as a strategic chokepoint if properly utilized.

Alfred Mahan’s "Sea Power Theory" emphasized control over strategic maritime passages and ports as central to global influence [9]. This principle is particularly relevant to Nicaragua’s proposed interoceanic canal project, which, if completed, could serve as an alternative to the Panama Canal and redefine maritime trade routes in the region [2].

Geostrategy and Great Power Rivalries

Geostrategy builds on classical geopolitics but focuses more specifically on how geographic resources are used to advance political and military objectives. States with geostrategic potential often become arenas for influence, rivalry, or cooperation among great powers [10].

In recent years, Nicaragua has become a focal point for geopolitical rivalry, particularly amidst the strategic competition between the United States and global actors like China and Russia. The U.S. considers Central America part of its traditional sphere of influence and monitors developments in the region closely [11]. Meanwhile, China has strengthened its engagement with Nicaragua under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), notably through investment agreements tied to the proposed canal project [3].

Simultaneously, Russia has deepened military and security cooperation with Nicaragua, including intelligence and cyber capabilities. The presence of Russian personnel and equipment in Nicaragua is a reflection of Moscow’s attempt to secure a geostrategic foothold in Latin America [12].

Critical Geopolitics and Identity-Based Representations

Critical geopolitics diverges from classical frameworks by focusing on discourse, representation, and the constructed nature of geopolitical space. It emphasizes how media, elites, and ideologies shape geopolitical narratives and perceptions [13].

In this view, Nicaragua’s foreign policy is not solely based on geography but is also deeply embedded in ideological narratives and identity politics. President Ortega’s administration has framed Nicaragua as a symbol of resistance against imperialism, aligning with anti-U.S. and anti-neoliberal rhetoric. Participation in regional alliances such as ALBA, cooperation with Venezuela and Cuba, and the use of state media to promote a “sovereignist” narrative are key elements of Nicaragua’s critical geopolitical discourse [4].

This approach also sheds light on the ideological and normative clashes between Nicaragua and the liberal international order. Nicaragua is framed as a “resistant space” that challenges the hegemony of Western institutions, leading to strained relations with organizations such as the Organization of American States (OAS) and even the European Union [5].

Integrating Approaches to Analyze Nicaragua

A comprehensive understanding of Nicaragua’s role in Latin American geopolitics necessitates an integrative theoretical lens. Classical geopolitics highlights the inherent geographic potential of Nicaragua. Geostrategy interprets how this potential is mobilized by external powers through strategic interests and alliances. Critical geopolitics explains how identity, discourse, and ideological framing shape the way Nicaragua is positioned both internally and externally.

Together, these perspectives illuminate the multifaceted nature of Nicaragua’s geopolitical significance. It is not merely a function of physical geography or transport infrastructure but also a result of symbolic narratives, strategic alignments, and the country’s role in broader ideological and geopolitical confrontations in the Western Hemisphere.

Analyzing the geostrategic and geopolitical position of Nicaragua in Latin America requires a thorough examination of spatial linkages, geographical capacities, international interactions, and the country's role in great power rivalries in the Western Hemisphere.

Nicaragua’s Geographical Location and Transit Capacities

Nicaragua, in terms of physical geography, is located at one of the most vital points in Latin America. Bordering Honduras to the north and Costa Rica to the south, the country has access to both the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. This location allows Nicaragua to potentially serve as a key commercial and military corridor between the two oceans—especially given that the distance between its eastern and western coasts is significantly shorter than that of Panama.

The presence of Lake Nicaragua (Lago Cocibolca), the largest freshwater lake in Central America, offers a natural asset for connecting the two coasts. Situated along the proposed canal route, the lake enhances the geographical feasibility of transit infrastructure. Furthermore, Nicaragua’s lower seismic activity compared to Panama makes it more reliable from an infrastructural and strategic perspective.

The Interoceanic Canal Project and Its Geostrategic Implications

Originally proposed in the 19th century, the Nicaragua Canal Project was officially launched in 2013 with the backing of the Chinese firm HKND and approval from President Daniel Ortega’s government. The project aimed to create an alternative to the Panama Canal and, if realized, could have significantly elevated Nicaragua’s geostrategic status.

Such a project could have had profound regional and international consequences:

Challenging the Panama Canal’s monopoly, thereby altering economic structures and geopolitical balances in Central America.

Increasing U.S. dependency on Nicaragua’s political stability, given the importance of secure trade routes.

Expanding Chinese influence in the U.S. backyard, raising alarms in Washington, and prompting diplomatic and security responses.

However, environmental concerns, social protests, and financial hurdles led to the project's suspension after 2016. Still, even in its inactive state, the canal remains a latent strategic asset and an important geopolitical variable.

Nicaragua’s Relations with Global and Regional Powers

Nicaragua’s geopolitical significance is deeply influenced by its interactions with global powers such as the United States, China, and Russia, as well as key Latin American countries.

United States: Washington has long considered Nicaragua part of its traditional sphere of influence in Central America and is wary of foreign influence in the country. In recent years, the U.S. has imposed economic sanctions, halted development aid, and supported opposition forces to maintain influence and limit Chinese and Russian penetration.

China: Since formally recognizing the People’s Republic of China in 2021, Nicaragua’s economic, technical, and diplomatic ties with Beijing have rapidly expanded. China views Nicaragua as part of the Belt and Road Initiative and has invested in infrastructure and digital connectivity to establish long-term strategic ties.

Russia: Nicaragua has a longstanding history of military and security cooperation with Russia. Recently, Russia has increased its presence through military training centers, deployment of advisors, and provision of equipment—raising concerns among the U.S. and regional neighbors.

Regional Countries: Nicaragua maintains close relations with Venezuela, Cuba, Bolivia, and other ALBA member states. These partnerships are largely ideologically driven, rooted in opposition to neoliberalism and U.S. hegemony.

Nicaragua’s Role in Regional Alliances and Ideological Orientations

Since President Ortega's return to power in 2007, Nicaragua’s foreign policy has been anchored on two main principles: (1) resisting U.S. hegemony and (2) fostering alliances with like-minded regional governments. The country’s membership in ALBA (Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America), participation in Petrocaribe, and active involvement in anti-Western forums reflect this orientation.

Nicaragua has utilized tools of cultural, media, and economic diplomacy to project itself as a symbol of anti-imperialist resistance in the region. While this stance has appealed to certain countries, it has also resulted in diplomatic isolation, such as strained relations with the Organization of American States (OAS) and the severance of ties with several European and Latin American governments.

Nicaragua as a Space of Geopolitical Resistance

A discourse analysis of Nicaragua’s foreign policy reveals a deliberate effort to construct and project an image of itself as a small yet resilient actor confronting the dominant international order. State media, presidential speeches, and official positions all emphasize themes of independence, sovereignty, and opposition to foreign intervention.

In this sense, Nicaragua can be understood as a "space of geopolitical resistance" within Latin America—a space defined not only by its geography but also by its ideological and strategic opposition to Western-centric global governance. This position has turned Nicaragua into a model for some leftist and anti-Western governments across the Global South.

The Impact of Nicaragua’s Geostrategic Location on Regional Security

Nicaragua’s unique location at the heart of Central America and its proximity to two major oceans make it a potential axis in regional security dynamics. Control over maritime borders, access to strategic sea routes, and proximity to vital communication lines have led major powers to view Nicaragua as a key element in military and security planning.

Nicaragua is also considered a potential transit route for drug trafficking and illegal migration from South to North America. Consequently, the United States has adopted a security-focused perspective toward Nicaragua and has sought to play a more active role in safeguarding its southern borders through initiatives like the Initiative for Central America and the Merida Initiative. However, Nicaragua’s government, in line with its independent foreign policy, has reduced many of its security collaborations with the U.S. and moved toward greater cooperation with Russia and China.

Diplomatic Shifts and Their Impact on Nicaragua’s Geopolitical Role

In the past decade, Nicaragua has undergone significant shifts in its international diplomacy, including:

Severing ties with Taiwan and formally recognizing the People’s Republic of China in 2021, which brought considerable economic, diplomatic, and strategic consequences.

Withdrawal from the Organization of American States (OAS) in response to the organization’s strong criticism of the government's repression of opposition groups.

Strengthening relations with BRICS countries, particularly in the context of South-South cooperation, infrastructure development, and resistance to sanctions.

These diplomatic realignments have enhanced Nicaragua’s standing among Global South countries and redefined it as an independent and resilient actor challenging the liberal international order.

The Political Economy of Nicaragua’s Geopolitics

Nicaragua’s economy, characterized by its natural resources, agricultural output, cheap labor, and strategic location, holds considerable geopolitical potential. Foreign investments—especially from China, Russia, Venezuela, and even some European countries—reflect long-term strategic interests. The Nicaraguan government has sought to attract aligned investors through tax incentives, free trade zones, and legal protections, aiming to position itself as an economic bridge between Asia, South America, and the United States.

However, this path is challenged by Western sanctions, systemic corruption, heavy dependence on foreign aid, and infrastructural deficiencies. Nonetheless, its proximity to energy resources and international transport corridors continues to make Nicaragua a significant player in the region’s geopolitical economy.

Nicaragua’s Position in the U.S.–China Hegemonic Rivalry

In recent years, Latin America has become a key battleground in the geopolitical rivalry between the United States and China. Due to its geographic location, economic fragility, and investment needs, Nicaragua has become a gateway for Chinese influence in the U.S.’s traditional sphere. Large-scale infrastructure projects, technology transfer proposals, and China’s non-interventionist diplomacy have attracted Nicaragua’s leaders.

Meanwhile, the U.S. views Nicaragua not only through a security lens but also as a potential weak link in its regional order. Consequently, it has pursued a containment strategy through economic pressure and regime-change efforts via support for opposition forces. This has made Nicaragua a pivotal node in the clash between competing global orders.

The findings of this research are based on a thorough analysis of Nicaragua's geographical position, transit capacities, international relations, and geopolitical role in Latin America. Nicaragua, with its strategic location in the heart of Central America, bordering Honduras and Costa Rica, and providing access to both the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, is recognized as a vital passageway between the two oceans, especially in commercial and military rivalries. Additionally, Lake Nicaragua, the largest freshwater lake in Central America, offers the country a significant advantage in internal transportation and coastal connectivity. This geographical position has turned Nicaragua into a key point in regional and international equations.

In recent years, the proposed construction of the Nicaragua Interoceanic Canal, supported by the Chinese company HKND and the government of Daniel Ortega, has become one of the most significant geopolitical issues. The project, aimed at competing with the Panama Canal and providing an alternative route, could have elevated Nicaragua's status as a crucial geopolitical node. The strategic consequences of this project include altering the power balance in Central America, increasing the United States' reliance on Nicaragua's internal security, and expanding China's influence in the Western Hemisphere. Although the project has been delayed due to environmental and economic issues, its potential still holds the capacity to affect regional geopolitical equations.

Nicaragua also plays an important role in the geopolitical rivalry between major powers, particularly the United States and China. The United States has always regarded Nicaragua as part of its sphere of influence in Central America and is sensitive to any foreign influence in the country. In recent years, Washington has resorted to economic sanctions and supporting the opposition to prevent the expansion of Chinese and Russian influence in Nicaragua. On the other hand, China, through investment in infrastructure projects and offering technological proposals, has turned Nicaragua into part of its Belt and Road Initiative. These developments have made Nicaragua a focal point in the geopolitical competition between the two superpowers.

Furthermore, Nicaragua has adopted a resistant foreign policy approach. Since Daniel Ortega's return to power in 2007, the country has defined its foreign policy based on opposing U.S. hegemony and strengthening ties with like-minded countries in the region. Membership in the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America (ALBA), joining organizations like Petrocaribe, and participating in anti-Western summits are among the measures the country has taken to strengthen regional alliances. Nicaragua has positioned itself as a symbol of anti-imperialist resistance against U.S. dominance and neoliberalism, which has brought it closer to left-wing governments in the region. However, this approach has led to Nicaragua's diplomatic isolation in certain international organizations, such as the Organization of American States (OAS).

Economically, Nicaragua has become an important player in the region, leveraging its natural resources, agricultural production, cheap labor, and geographic location. Foreign investments, especially from China, Russia, and Venezuela, reflect the strategic interests in the country. The Nicaraguan government has attempted to attract foreign investors through tax incentives, free trade zones, and legal support, aiming to position itself as an economic bridge between Asia, South America, and the United States. However, challenges such as Western sanctions, structural corruption, and reliance on foreign aid remain significant obstacles to the country's economic growth.

Nicaragua also plays a key role in the hegemonic competition between the United States and China. China, through investment in infrastructure projects and employing non-interference diplomacy, has sought to expand its influence in Nicaragua and incorporate it into its Belt and Road Initiative. In contrast, the United States views Nicaragua not only through a security lens but also as a potential point of rupture in its regional order, pursuing policies of containment, economic pressure, and efforts to change the regime by supporting the opposition. This rivalry between the two great powers has made Nicaragua a pivotal point in global geopolitical struggles.

Ultimately, Nicaragua is considered a "geopolitical node" in Central America. Its unique geographical position, independent foreign policy, potential economic capacities, and strategic ties with Eastern actors are reshaping its role in regional and international order. However, domestic challenges such as political instability, infrastructural deficiencies, and diplomatic pressures have limited the country’s ability to fully capitalize on its strategic position. Nicaragua sits at the crossroads of strategic paths of global powers, and while it has managed to establish itself as an independent and resilient actor, it still faces significant challenges in securing and stabilizing its position in the global order.

The conclusion of this study analyzes Nicaragua's geopolitical and geostrategic position in Latin America, clarifying the country's role in complex international and regional equations. Nicaragua’s geographical location, situated in the heart of Central America and between two major oceans, is one of its most prominent and strategic features. This location, in addition to its transit capabilities, has made Nicaragua a key point in the balance of global powers. The proposed inter-oceanic canal project, which emerged in recent years with the aim of competing with the Panama Canal and turning Nicaragua into a critical geostrategic node on the global stage, could have brought about major changes in the region’s economic and political structures. Although the project was halted due to environmental and economic challenges, it still reflects Nicaragua’s potential capacity in the contemporary world.

In its relations with global powers, particularly the United States, China, and Russia, Nicaragua has played a pivotal role. The United States, which has always viewed Nicaragua as part of its sphere of influence in Central America, has been sensitive to the expansion of Chinese and Russian influence in the country and has sought to limit this influence through sanctions and support for internal opposition. In contrast, Nicaragua, by embracing Chinese investments and strengthening ties with Russia, has aimed to position itself as an independent and resilient nation against international pressures. These shifts in Nicaragua's foreign policy, especially the severing of ties with Taiwan and the formal recognition of China in 2021, as well as its withdrawal from the Organization of American States (OAS), have positioned the country as an independent player, resisting the liberal international order.

Another significant aspect of Nicaragua’s foreign policy analysis is its reliance on regional and ideological alliances. Especially during Daniel Ortega’s presidency, Nicaragua has strengthened its relations with ALBA (Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America) member countries, seeking to bolster its role in resisting U.S. hegemony and neoliberalism. These regional and ideological alliances have allowed Nicaragua to position itself as a center of anti-imperialist resistance, gaining support from like-minded nations. However, this approach has led to diplomatic isolation and reduced engagement with international organizations like the OAS.

Economically, Nicaragua has leveraged its natural resources, geographical position, and cheap labor to attract foreign investment from various countries, including China and Russia. The country has worked to become an economic bridge between Latin America and Asia by creating free trade zones and offering tax incentives. Despite these efforts, challenges such as Western sanctions, internal corruption, dependence on foreign aid, and infrastructure weaknesses have hindered Nicaragua’s ability to fully exploit its economic potential.

In recent years, Latin America has become a crucial arena for geopolitical competition between the United States and China. Nicaragua, due to its unique geographic position, economic weaknesses, and need for investment, has provided a fertile ground for China to expand its influence in what has traditionally been the U.S.'s sphere of dominance. Major infrastructure projects, technology transfers, and China’s non-interventionist diplomacy have attracted Nicaragua’s leadership. On the other hand, the United States views Nicaragua not only through a security lens but also as a potential point of failure in its regional order. As a result, it has adopted a policy of containment, economic pressure, and attempts at regime change by supporting the opposition. This situation has made Nicaragua a key point of tension in the struggle between global systems.

Ultimately, Nicaragua has redefined its role in the regional and international order as a "geopolitical knot" in Central America. With a combination of a unique geographical location, independent foreign policy, untapped economic potential, and strategic ties with Eastern powers, Nicaragua has become a significant player in Latin America’s geopolitical equations. However, internal instability, infrastructure weaknesses, economic pressures, and diplomatic isolation have made it difficult for the country to fully capitalize on its advantages. While Nicaragua is recognized as an independent and resilient actor, it still faces challenges that limit its ability to realize its strategic objectives. In conclusion, Nicaragua can be seen as a model of resistance to the liberal world order and as a pivotal point in geopolitical struggles in Latin America and beyond. However, to solidify this position, the country must address both internal and external challenges that may shape its future trajectory.

1. Klein HS. A Concise History of Central America. Cambridge University Press. 2020.
2. Ellis R E. The Strategic Role of Latin America in the Chinese Global Projection. Air & Space Power Journal. 2017; 31: 27-44.
3. Rouvinski V. Russia’s Return to Latin America: Nicaragua as a Strategic Partner. Latin American Policy. 2022; 13: 34-49.
4. Serbin A. ALBA and the Reshaping of Regional Geopolitics. In A. Serbin (Ed.), Latin American Regionalism in Crisis. 2016; 77-94.
5. Freedom House. Freedom in the World 2023: Nicaragua. 2023.
6. Shifter M, Trinkunas HA. Order from Chaos: Reimagining U.S.-Latin America Relations. Brookings Institution. 2020.
7. Cohen SB. Geopolitics: The Geography of International Relations. Rowman & Littlefield. 2003.
8. Mackinder HJ. The Geographical Pivot of History. The Geographical Journal. 1904; 23: 421-437.
9. Mahan AT. The Influence of Sea Power upon History, 1660–1783. Little, Brown and Co. 1890.
10. Brzezinski Z. The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives. Basic Books. 1997.
11. Dominguez JI. The Future of Inter-American Relations. Routledge. 2000.
12. Kellogg P. Russia and Latin America: Building Strategic Relationships. Global Affairs. 2019; 5: 171-190.
13. O’ Tuathail G. Critical Geopolitics: The Politics of Writing Global Space. University of Minnesota Press. 1996.