A Case of Allogenic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Harvest in a Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH) Patient from a Covid Positive Donor: Managing the Unpreventable
Chowdhry M
Published on: 2023-02-06
Abstract
Background
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS- CoV- 2) affected medical services globally in several aspects. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) data, COVID-19 was reported in 64.38 crore people and resulted in the mortality of 66.30 lakh worldwide as of 12.12.2022 [1].
Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare, acquired disease caused by clonal expansion of one or more hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) lines due to a somatic mutation of the phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor (PIG-A) gene located on Xp22.1. PNH can affect multiple systems in the body and requires multidisciplinary clinical management. Patients can manifest with severe pancytopenia, life-threatening thrombosis affecting the hepatic, abdominal, cerebral, and subdermal veins, and high requirements for blood transfusion due to haemolytic anemia. PNH can also be associated with bone marrow failure [2]. Advances in diagnostic techniques and a targeted therapeutic approach for PNH have emerged in the last two decades. Eculizumab, a promising humanized monoclonal antibody against C5, is the first approved therapy for PNH [2] HSCT is a high-risk procedure and is still associated with almost 30% of mortality mainly due to infections and acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). However, it is the only curative treatment available for patients with PNH. In this paper we describe a PNH patient who received a successful peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplant from an asymptomatic COVID-positive donor.
Keywords
Blood stem cell; PNH; Respiratory syndromeCase Report
This is a case of a 20-year-old healthy female, with a history of fainting episode (one month back) and no known comorbidities. The patient gave a history of bleeding gums and menorrhagia with pancytopenia. Her urine routine, microscopy and X-ray chest showed normal study. Further, the HLA typing of the patient was performed to look for options for a bone marrow transplant.
Her investigations are described in table 1.
Table 1: Lab investigations.
Investigation |
Result |
Reference range |
Hemoglobin |
8.3 g/dl |
11.0 – 15.0 g/dl |
Total leukocyte count |
1.8 * 103/mm3 |
4.0 – 10.0 * 103/mm3 |
Platelet count |
16* 103/mm3 |
150 - 410* 103/mm3 |
Reticulocyte count |
2% |
1-2 % |
LDH |
285 |
140 – 280 U/L |
Peripheral smear showed normocytic normochromic red blood cells with diminished platelets. No immature cells were seen. Bone marrow aspiration showed erythroid preponderance with suspicion of subcortical physiological hypoplasia with 1- 2% ring sideroblasts. The myeloid: erythroid ratio was reversed to 1:3.4. Erythropoiesis was mildly megaloblastic with a moderate degree of dyserythropoeisis (<10%). Myelopoiesis showed maturation up to neutrophils. Megakaryocytes were diminished. Bone marrow biopsy revealed periosteum, cortex, and marrow spaces intervening the bony trabeculae. A reduced cellularity for age with overall cellularity of 40-45% was noted. There was erythroid preponderance with a mildly megaloblastic reaction. Myelopoiesis showed maturation up to neutrophils. Few megakaryocytes with normal morphology and topography were present. Myelogram showed: Neutrophils-08%, Metamyelocyte-04%, Myelocyte- 04%, Promyelocyte-01%, Blast-00%, Eosinophil-00%, Monocyte-00%, Lymphocyte-23%, Plasma cells-02%, Erythroid cells-58%. Flow cytometry showed a PNH clone within the neutrophils (25.6%) and monocytes (30.3%).
The patient had a full HLA match with her sister (10/10). CT scan venogram brain showed no significant abnormality. There was no evidence of any deep venous thrombosis. Also, the blood parameters and the symptoms remained unchanged in spite of multiple blood transfusions.
The patient was then admitted to the bone marrow transplant unit with a neutropenic diet [3]. Her body weight, vital signs, input, and output were monitored twice daily. Protocols for thrombocytopenic precautions like avoidance of aspirin therapy and intramuscular injections were followed. Irradiated blood components were advised. A peripherally inserted central catheter was placed and a conditioning regimen of Busulphan-Cyclophosphamide for PNH was started including antimicrobial, antiemetic, seizure, and veno-occlusive prophylaxis via the infusion pumps. Injection Busulfan 150 mg (3.2mg/kg) intravenous infusion was given on day -4. Injection cyclophosphamide 2900 mg (60mg/kg) from day –3 to day –2 and Injection Ifosfamide 3000 mg was administered from day-3 to day-2.
The donor had arrived from overseas, therefore, Covid – 19 RT-PCR testing was done as part of routine Indian - International air travel guidelines [4]. The donor came out to be Covid – 19 RT-PCR negative. The PBSC was planned two weeks after her arrival. The RT-PCR test was repeated before admission as part of the Institutional protocol and this time the donor was found to be SARS- CoV- 2 positive but without any symptoms.
As the patient had already received myeloablative conditioning, based on risk-benefit analysis, transplantation was a must. The initial plan for bone marrow harvesting was deferred as the procedure had to be done as an inpatient basis inside an operation theatre. Therefore, in a multidisciplinary meeting consisting of specialists from hematology, transfusion medicine, infection control, COVID nodal officer, and management, it was consensually decided on a PBSC harvest which was to be performed in a COVID isolation unit.
The donor was of A positive blood group and the patient was of O positive blood group. The anti-A titer was 1:32. Injection Filgrastim 600 mcg[10mcg/kg] S/C was administered every day from day -4 to day 0 one week before harvesting. An informed written consent was taken from the donor before the stem cell harvest. Considering the procedure was being performed on a SARS- CoV- 2 positive donor, special precautions and all personnel protective equipment (PPE) were used in accordance with the infection control policy.
Allogeneic stem cell harvest was performed under aseptic procedures using Spectra Optia Apheresis System (Lakewood, Colorado 80215, USA). After processing a total blood volume of 10280 ml, a CD 34 count of 2170 cells/microliters with a product volume of 210 ml was obtained. A product yield of 9.53 million cells/kg was obtained. The total time taken for the procedure was 1 hour and 861 ml of acid citrate dextrose (ACD) was used for anticoagulation. Intravenous calcium replacement was given prophylactically at a dose appropriate to the donor’s body weight to prevent hypocalcemia due to citrate-related toxicity.
The patient was administered the stem cell product on the same day of collection and she tolerated the procedure well on 18/12/2021 [day 0] without any adverse events. She was also closely monitored to look for any signs or symptoms suggestive of SARS- CoV- 2 infection. The patient stayed in an isolation unit after transplantation and was also checked once a week with RT-PCR for SARS CoV-2 and her COVID-19 PCR status remained negative on 15/12/2021,20/12/2021 and 27/12/2021. Her Graft Vs Host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of I. V Cyclosporine 150 mg (3mg/kg) which started on day+ 2 along with a short course of methotrexate 15mg/m2 on day+1. This was followed by 10mg/m2 on day +3,+6 and +11. No features of GVHD were observed in the patient.
Her hematological recovery was seen from day +11 onwards. The neutrophil engraftment of ANC>500 cells/uL was achieved on day +11. Her WBC count reached >1000 cells/uL on day +12 and platelet >20,000/mm3 on three consecutive days was met from day +15. The patient was discharged on 2/01/2022 in a stable condition.
Since the outbreak of the omicron variant of covid 19, genotyping of all international patients affected with SARS- CoV- 2 was done as a protocol in India. Since this sequencing was performed by Government authorities, a report of the exact variant was unavailable at the time of writing the report by the authors.
Discussion
A drastic fall in the number of elective procedures was noticed after the outbreak of SARS Covid 19 infection. Even though specific regulations were available early for protecting patients from COVID - 19 infections, detailed guidelines for organizing and performing an elective procedure, as well as ethical considerations came late in 2021 [5]. In addition to this, the emergence of the Omicron variant of SARS-COVID worsened the situation.
Here we describe a rare case of mandate PBSC harvest and thereafter transplantation in a case of PNH from a SARS- CoV- 2 positive donor.
The European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) guidelines do not approve the donation of stem cells from a COVID positive donor and additionally require a deferral of 14 days from the infection [6]. They further recommend that in case the patient’s transplant is urgent and the donor is completely well, a test is negative for SARS-CoV-2 and there are no suitable alternative donors, earlier collection may be considered subject to careful risk assessment [6]. Yet, there have been rare cases of donations from across the world. Like, Mathieu et al reported 2 cases of successful stem cell harvesting done in France from a COVID-positive donors for patients with acute myeloid leukemia [7]. These patients tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 after running biweekly test for 4 weeks with nasopharyngeal swabs and plasma. Also, the case report by Usanarat et al. showed a successful bone marrow harvest from a COVID positive donor in beta-thalassemia [8]. The harvested marrow was tested by RT-PCR and was negative for SARS-CoV-2. The marrow was then processed and given to the patient on the same day. From India, there has been an isolated report from Pune [9], where A 55-year-old man suffering from severe form of blood cancer receive blood stem cells from his son with active CoV infection and remained negative for Covid-19 even after 6 months of follow-up. In the above reports, no attempt for PBSC collection was done.
In the case studied by us, the donor was the sister of the patient and had arrived from overseas. The donor got affected with SARS- CoV 2 infection one day prior to bone marrow harvest. The patient was on a conditioning regime hence stem cell infusion was inevitable.
In India, after the emergence of the first Omicron case in December 2021, stringent guidelines were put forward for the admission of patients especially foreign nationals. The initial plan of the bone marrow harvest procedure was not performed as it had to be done on an inpatient basis under anesthesia and thus it requires more elaborate arrangements. The treatment plan from bone marrow harvest to PBSC was changed. It can now be done as an outpatient procedure. The PBSC harvesting was done in the COVID isolation unit under proper COVID precautionary measures. The importance of a multidisciplinary approach in such cases cannot be over-emphasized.
With the limited data available, there has been no evidence of transfusion-transmitted infection from an asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 donor [10,11].
From our article and a few other previous studies published, we suggest that the donation of peripheral stem cell harvest from a SARS-CoV-2 donor could be considered as a last resort in appalling situations because generally it will not lead to hematogenous viral transmission of SARS-CoV-2. However, the above procedure needs to be done by experts under all aseptic precautions.
The article not only depicts the rarity of the procedure but also highlights the importance of the safety of an outpatient PBSC procedure over a Bone marrow harvest procedure which requires much more advanced and elaborate arrangements.
References
- WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard [Internet]. 2022.
- Sahin F, Ozkan MC, Mete NG, Yilmaz M, Oruc N, Gurgun A, et al. Multidisciplinary clinical management of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Am J Blood Res. 2015; 5: 1-9.
- Jubelirer SJ. The benefit of the neutropenic diet: fact or fiction? Oncologist. 2011; 16: 704-707.
- https://www.mohfw.gov.in/pdf/GuidelinesforInternationalarrivalsdated30thNovember2021.pdf
- Hunger R, König V, Stillger R, Mantke R. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on delays in surgical procedures in Germany: a multi-center analysis of an administrative registry of 176,783 patients. Patient Saf Surg. 2022; 16: 22.
- Ljungman P, Mikulska M, de la Camara R, Basak GW, Chabannon C, Corbacioglu S, et al. The challenge of COVID-19 and hematopoietic cell transplantation; EBMT recommendations for management of hematopoietic cell transplant recipients, their donors, and patients undergoing CAR T-cell therapy. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020; 55: 2071-2076.
- Leclerc M, Fourati S, Menouche D, Challine D, Maury S. Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation from SARS-CoV-2 positive donors. Lancet Haematol. 2021; 8: e167-e169.
- Anurathapan U, Apiwattanakul N, Pakakasama S, Pongphitcha P, Thitithanyanont A, Pasomsub E, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from an infected SARS-CoV2 donor sibling. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020; 55: 2359-2360.
- isalkar umesh, editor. Pune: Man gets Covid-positive son’s bone marrow, stays infection free. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/pune/man-gets-covid-positive-sons-bone-marrow-stays-infection-free/articleshow/79518847.cms. TIMES OF INDIA; 2020.
- Corman VM, Rabenau HF, Adams O, Oberle D, Funk MB, Keller-Stanislawski B, Timm J, Drosten C, Ciesek S. SARS-CoV-2 asymptomatic and symptomatic patients and risk for transfusion transmission. Transfusion. 2020; 60: 1119-1122.
- Cappy P, Candotti D, Sauvage V, Lucas Q, Boizeau L, Gomez J, et al. No evidence of SARS-CoV-2 transfusion transmission despite RNA detection in blood donors showing symptoms after donation. Blood. 2020; 136: 1888-1891.