Trends in the Use of Nanoparticles for Breast Cancer Treatment in Women: A Brief Review

Karami MH and Abdouss M

Published on: 2024-08-13

Abstract

Nanoparticles are crucial in enhancing breast cancer diagnosis and treatment globally. Researchers use nanoparticles to address issues like drug resistance and non-specific drug distribution, improving drug delivery efficiency and enabling early detection of metastatic disease. Integrating nanoparticles into existing treatments like photo thermal therapy and immunotherapy shows promise in improving outcomes in breast cancer care. However, challenges such as ensuring chemical feasibility, assessing nanoparticle safety, and navigating regulatory pathways must be addressed for successful clinical translation. This review evaluates current nanoparticle research in breast cancer therapy, highlighting innovative applications and addressing limitations and obstacles for effective clinical use. It offers a comprehensive perspective on the future of nanoparticle-based strategies in improving breast cancer diagnosis and treatment, considering both potential benefits and challenges.

Keywords

Classification of nanoparticles; Diagnostic; Therapeutic potential; Challenges

Background

Breast cancer continues to be a global health problem with approximately 2.3 million new cases diagnosed each year. The complexity of this disease requires personalized treatment strategies based on each patient's tumor characteristics [1]. Mutations in genes such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 play an important role in the development and progression of breast cancer. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway is essential for tumor growth and survival, making it a therapeutic target. Current treatments include surgery, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and tumor-specific therapies [2-4]. However, challenges such as high relapse rates, drug resistance, metastasis, and side effects persist. Innovative approaches, like nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery, show promise in improving treatment outcomes by minimizing harm to healthy tissues [5]. These delivery systems can improve drug efficacy and stability. Advances in genomics and proteomics can improve our understanding of breast cancer, leading to the discovery of important biomarkers that can guide treatment decisions and improve drug delivery. Combining modern technology with traditional therapies can improve breast cancer treatment and ultimately improve patient outcomes [6].

This review seeks to offer a comprehensive assessment of the future potential of nanoparticle-based strategies for improving breast cancer diagnosis and treatment, emphasizing their possible advantages as well as the challenges they might face. Classification of nanoparticles is very important and can also be related to therapeutic factors, making them effective in a cycle (Fig.1).

Fig 1: Important points about using nanoparticles.

Classification of Nanoparticles

Nanoparticles are defined as particles that are smaller than 100 nanometers in size. Their small scale gives them unique characteristics that differentiate them from traditional materials. This small size allows for improved chemical interactions, higher energy absorption, and increased strength. Table 1 displays different types of nanoparticles along with their physical and chemical properties [7-8].

Table 1: Nanoparticle Properties in Breast Cancer Research.

Nanoparticle Type

Targeting Mechanism and Surface Modification

References

Carbon materials like nanotubes and graphene vary in dimensions.

Passive accumulation is naturally gathering substances, while active functionalization deliberately modifies compounds.

[1]

PLGA and PEG are types of polymers characterized by dimensions of 10 to 100 nm.

Passive targeting uses EPR effect for agent accumulation in tumor tissues. Active targeting delivers agents to cells through ligand-receptor interactions. Targeting ligands improve specificity and efficacy in cancer treatment.

[3]

Hybrid refers to a mix of the aforementioned materials, varying in consistency.

Enhancing drug delivery precision and effectiveness through multiple targeting mechanisms.

[5]

Lipid-based structures, such as cholesterol and phospholipids, range in size from 30 to 100 nanometers.

PEGylation enhances drugs; targeting improves specificity and delivery.

[1-4]

Protein-based components include albumin and ferritin, which typically range from 10 to 100 nm, although measurements can be inconsistent.

Active targeting uses natural ligands to target receptors for drug delivery.

[6]

Inorganic gold and iron oxide particles range from 2 to 100 nm in size, but their characteristics can vary.

Passive targeting EPR effect for tumor drug accumulation. Active targeting uses ligand-receptor interactions. Silica coating for controlled release. Targeting moieties enhance drug delivery efficacy.

[8-11]

The synthesis of nanoparticles requires careful consideration of their size, charge, and characteristics. The addition of drugs such as antibodies or peptides can improve the targeting ability of these nanoparticles for therapeutic purposes. Various types of nanoparticles, made from materials such as lipids, plastics, iron, proteins, and carbon monoxide, offer unique advantages in drug delivery, genetic applications, and disease diagnosis and treatment [9-10]. Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) are highly valuable in cancer therapy due to their unique characteristics, including various shapes and sizes, and their ability to be efficiently, stably, and safely produced in the body [11]. Their exceptional light-responsive properties make them useful in photo thermal therapy (PTT), effectively destroying cancer cells while preserving healthy tissue. However, concerns about potential risks associated with AuNPs in medical applications emphasize the need for safe production methods. Research on inorganic nanoparticles (INPs), such as silica, silver and iron oxide, has led to new therapeutic approaches [12]. These INPs have advantageous features like magnetism, thermal stability, and chemical resilience, making them valuable in medicine, drug delivery, and pain management. They can perform multiple functions simultaneously to assist in cancer treatment and enhance doctors' understanding of the disease through imaging. These innovations show significant potential for using nanoparticles in the fight against cancer [13-15].

Nanoparticles Enhance Diagnostic Accuracy in Breast Tumor

Timely identification of breast tumor is crucial for successful treatment and favorable results. Traditional methods such as blood tests and chemotherapy may have difficulties in detecting cancer in its early stages. However, nanotechnology has revolutionized cancer diagnosis by using small particles that can gather in tumors, increasing both accuracy and sensitivity [16]. For example, researcher Wang G. has created super paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIOs) that glow when near tumors, aiding in the detection of cancer. Similarly, Liang and colleagues have developed specialized light sensors with hot rods to help in early cancer detection and timely treatment. This advanced technology also shows promise in identifying circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and adding to our knowledge of cancer development and treatment strategies in humans. Furthermore, Wang M. has come up with a way to assess HER2 levels in CTCs using light, which can assist in treatment decisions and improve patient outcomes [17]. While these advancements allow for quick interventions and improved imaging precision, it is important to implement safety precautions to reduce risks such as physical harm. Studying how nanoparticles interact with unintended tissues is essential to avoid adverse effects. This understanding will help ensure continued advancements in nanoparticle-based diagnostics [18].

Therapeutic Promise of Nanoparticles

Nanoparticles are emerging as a promising approach to enhance the treatment of breast cancer, offering the potential for more effective therapies while minimizing side effects. Various formulations of nanoparticles, such as Abraxane and Genexol-PM, have been developed to specifically target cancer cells and facilitate more precise drug delivery [19]. These formulations take advantage of the Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) effect, which enhances the effectiveness of drug distribution. Moreover, they enable controlled release of medications, reducing the frequency of required injections. Cutting-edge therapies like ELU001 and CALAA-01 utilize innovative techniques to direct drugs straight to cancer cells, thereby optimizing drug efficacy and sparing healthy tissue from damage [20]. Current clinical trials are evaluating novel cancer treatments, focusing on personalized therapy approaches. Ongoing research into nanoparticle applications is advancing drug delivery systems, enhancing patient outcomes, and reducing side effects by customizing medications to the specific characteristics of cancer cells and their environments [21].

Obstacles, Interpretation, and Prospective Paths for Nanoparticles in the Management of Clinical Breast Cancer

The use of nanoparticles in drug development shows significant promise, but it also raises safety concerns due to their ability to disrupt natural biological processes [22-24]. Their tiny size allows for complex interactions with biological materials, which can result in harmful effects like cellular stress and genetic damage. There is also a risk of delayed growth in essential organs such as the liver and spleen, leading to potential long-term health complications [25-27]. Moreover, challenges in manufacturing and quality control make it difficult to interpret clinical outcomes. To address these issues, it is important to establish and follow guidelines for good manufacturing practices. Collaborative efforts in research, education, and policy development are necessary to tackle safety and other concerns. Improved monitoring of hospital safety and strict quality control measures can help identify and minimize risks. Increased collaboration between public and private sectors can promote interest in nanoparticle therapies [28]. Additionally, government agencies should simplify approval processes and provide clear regulations to reduce costs and timeframes. This has led me to consider how integrated, multidisciplinary care approaches could contribute to the development of more personalized cancer treatment options [29-31].

Conclusions

The use of nanoparticles, which are minuscule particles with unique properties due to their size and surface characteristics, is changing the way cancer detection and treatment are approached by allowing for customized and personalized strategies. These tiny particles offer new solutions to issues in traditional medicine and are being applied in various ways such as diagnostics, targeted drug delivery, and immunotherapy, especially for breast cancer. However, despite their potential, challenges related to safety, effectiveness, and regulatory approval are slowing down the adoption of nanoparticle-based treatments in clinical settings. Future research should focus on overcoming these challenges by utilizing comprehensive data and combining therapies to improve the accuracy and efficacy of personalized medicine. Bringing nanoparticle treatments from the laboratory to practical use will require thorough testing, advanced manufacturing methods, and proper regulatory monitoring. While nanoparticle treatments show great promise in advancing our understanding of breast cancer through a more personalized and less invasive approach, their incorporation into standard healthcare must carefully consider ethical concerns, costs, and overall effectiveness.

Credit Authorship Contribution Statement

Mohammad Hossein Karami: Supervision, Validation, Formal analysis, Data duration, Investigation, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing - review & editing, Visualization, Project administration, Methodology.

Majid Abdouss: Supervision, Validation.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Arnold M, Morgan E, Rumgay H, Mafra A, Singh D, Laversanne M, et al. Current and future burden of breast cancer: Global statistics for 2020 and 2040. Breast. 2022; 66: 15-23.
  2. Li S, Silvestri V, Leslie G, Rebbeck TR, Neuhausen SL, Hopper JL, et al. Cancer Risks Associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants. J. Clin. Oncol. 2022; 40: 1529-1541.
  3. Mundekkad D, Cho WC. Nanoparticles in Clinical Translation for Cancer Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022; 23: 1685.
  4. Rej RK, Roy J, Allu SR. Therapies for the Treatment of Advanced/Metastatic Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: Current Situation and Future Directions. Cancers. 2024; 16: 552.
  5. Karami MH, Abdouss M. Cutting-edge tumor nanotherapy: Advancements in 5-fluorouracil Drug-loaded chitosan nanoparticles. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2024; 164: 112430.
  6. Yao Y, Zhou, Y, Liu L, Xu Y, Chen Q, Wang Y, et al. Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery in Cancer Therapy and Its Role in Overcoming Drug Resistance. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2020; 7: 193.
  7. Kong X, Qi Y, Wang X, Jiang R, Wang J, Fang Y, et al. Nanoparticle drug delivery systems and their applications as targeted therapies for triple negative breast cancer. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2023; 134: 101070.
  8. Ajith S, Almomani F, Elhissi A, Husseini GA. Nanoparticle-based materials in anticancer drug delivery: Current and future prospects. Heliyon. 2023; 9: e21227.
  9. Rethi L, Mutalik C, Anurogo D, Lu LS, Chu HY, Yougbaré S, et al. Lipid-Based Nanomaterials for Drug Delivery Systems in Breast Cancer Therapy. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12: 2948.
  10. Bourang S, Noruzpour M, Godekahriz JS, Ebrahimi HAC, Amani A, Zakaria AR, et al. Application of nanoparticles in breast cancer treatment: A systematic review. Naunyn. Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 2024; 1-47.
  11. Sartaj A, Qamar Z, Qizilbash FF, Annu Md S, Alhakamy NA, Baboota S, et al. Polymeric Nanoparticles: Exploring the Current Drug Development and Therapeutic Insight of Breast Cancer Treatment and Recommendations. Polymers. 2021; 13: 4400.
  12. Liu Y, Guo K, Ding M, Zhang B, Xiao N, Tang Z, et al. Engineered Magnetic Polymer Nanoparticles Can Ameliorate Breast Cancer Treatment Inducing Pyroptosis–Starvation along with Chemotherapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2022; 14: 42541-42557.
  13. D?ugosz O, Matyjasik W, Hodacka G, Szostak K, Matysik J, Krawczyk P, et al. Inorganic Nanomaterials Used in Anti-Cancer Therapies: Further Developments. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13: 1130.
  14. Karami MH, Abdouss M, Maleki B. The state of the art metal nanoparticles in drug delivery systems: A comprehensive review. Nanomed J. 2024; 11: 222-249.
  15. Karami MH, Aghabarari B. The advancement of molybdenum disulfide quantum dots nanoparticles as nanocarrier for drug delivery systems: Cutting-edge in dual therapeutic roles. J. Mol. Struct. 2024; 1318: 139149.
  16. Saif A, Anjum L, Faisal Z, Akram N, Shah YA, Irfan R, et al. Recent advances in protein-based nanoparticles and their applications in the delivery of bioactive compounds. Int. J. Food Prop. 2023; 26: 2866-2880.
  17. Mohan H, Fagan A, Giordani S. Carbon Nanomaterials (CNMs) in Cancer Therapy: A Database of CNM-Based Nanocarrier Systems. Pharmaceutics. 2023; 15: 1545.
  18. Rajana N, Mounika A, Chary PS, Bhavana V, Urati A, Khatri D, et al. Multifunctional hybrid nanoparticles in diagnosis and therapy of breast cancer. J. Control. Release. 2022; 352: 1024-1047.
  19. Marshall SK, Angsantikul P, Pang Z, Nasongkla N, Hussen RSD, Thamphiwatana SD. Biomimetic Targeted Theranostic Nanoparticles for Breast Cancer Treatment. Molecules. 2022; 27: 6473.
  20. Araújo JL, Vieira JA, Dos Santos Silva M, Lima AKO, Luz GVdaS, Carneiro MLB, et al. Benefits of using polymeric nanoparticles in breast cancer treatment: A systematic review. 3 Biotech. 2023; 13: 357.
  21. Dheyab MA, Aziz AA, Khaniabadi PM, Jameel MS, Oladzadabbasabadi N, Rahman AA, et al. Gold nanoparticles-based photothermal therapy for breast cancer. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 2023; 42: 103312.
  22. Rahimkhoei V, Alzaidy AH, Abed MJ, Rashki S, Salavati-Niasari M. Advances in inorganic nanoparticles-based drug delivery in targeted breast cancer theranostics. Adv. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2024; 329: 103204.
  23. Mal S, Chakraborty S, Mahapatra M, Pakeeraiah K, Das S, Paidesetty SK, et al. Tackling breast cancer with gold nanoparticles: Twinning synthesis and particle engineering with efficacy. Nanoscale Adv. 2024; 6: 2766-2812.
  24. Kumar PPP, Lim DK. Photothermal Effect of Gold Nanoparticles as a Nanomedicine for Diagnosis and Therapeutics. Pharmaceutics. 2023; 15: 2349.
  25. Alshangiti DM, Ghobashy MM, Alqahtani HA, El-Damhougy TK, Madani M. The energetic and physical concept of gold nanorod-dependent fluorescence in cancer treatment and development of new photonic compounds|review. RSC Adv. 2023; 13: 32223-32265.
  26. Tai J, Fan S, Ding S, Ren L. Gold Nanoparticles Based Optical Biosensors for Cancer Biomarker Proteins: A Review of the Current Practices. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022; 10: 877193.
  27. Karami MH, Abdouss M. Recent advances of carbon quantum dots in tumor imaging. Nanomed J. 2024; 11: 13-35.
  28. Prasad A, Bakr MM, ElMeshad AN. Surface-functionalised polymeric nanoparticles for breast cancer treatment: Processes and advances. J. Drug Target. 2024; 1-15.
  29. Karami MH, Abdouss M. A General Evaluation of the Cellular Role in Drug Release: A Clinical Review Study. Clin J Obstet Gynecol. 2024; 7: 042-050.
  30. Karami MH; Abdouss M, Karami M. Evaluation of In vitro and Ex vivo Models for Studying the Effectiveness of Vaginal Drug Systems in Controlling Microbe Infections: A Systematic Review. Clin J Obstet Gynecol. 2023; 6: 201-215.
  31. Falagan-Lotsch P, Grzincic EM, Murphy CJ. New Advances in Nanotechnology-Based Diagnosis and Therapeutics for Breast Cancer: An Assessment of Active-Targeting Inorganic Nanoplatforms. Bioconjug. Chem. 2017; 28: 135-152.