Diagnostic Role of Serum ADA in Smear Negative Pulmonary TB
Ali N, Ali IA, Biswas S and Azad KAK
Published on: 2024-04-02
Abstract
Background
Diagnosis of tuberculosis is not always easy, particularly if it is a case of sputum smear negative pulmonary tuberculosis (SNPTB). Patients with respiratory symptoms resembling SNPTB is difficult to differentiate on the basis of clinical features, chest X-ray and Xpert MTB/RIF negativity. So, additional diagnostic test with high sensitivity and specificity is needed to increase the yield of the ongoing diagnostic strategy for SNPTB. Adenosine deaminase (ADA) is now being widely used for the diagnosis of TB particularly in effusion fluids due to its simplicity, low cost and quick available results but, it is not always possible to access effusion fluids and therefore, it would be helpful to take advantage of serum levels. Therefore, the purpose of the study was to assess the role of serum ADA in diagnosis of SNPTB.
Methods
This cross-sectional analytical study was conducted in Dhaka Medical College & Hospital, Dhaka from March 2019 to September 2021. A total 140 patients were included in this study and divided into two groups according to selection criteria: Group I (SNPTB, n=62), and Group II (non-TB pulmonary diseases, n=78). ADA estimation was carried out using the sensitive colorimetric method described by Guisti and Galanti with BIOSIC kit. After collection of all the required data, analysis was done by SPSS 24.0.
Results
Mean age of the study patients was 48.02 ± 9.60 years (23-73 years) with male predominance in both Group I and Group II (71 % and 60.3%, respectively, p>0.05). Non-TB pulmonary cases were significantly older than SNPTB patients (52 ± 8.56 vs 43.02 ± 8.49 years, p<0.001). SNPTB patients had significantly higher frequency of cough, fe0ver and weight loss compared to non-TB pulmonary cases (p<0.05). In contrast, chest pain and shortness of breath were more frequent in Group II than in Group I (p<0.05). Serum ADA was significantly higher among SNPTB patients compared to non-TB pulmonary cases (48.16 ± 12.13 vs 18.64 ± 7.85 IU/L, p<0.001). ROC analysis of serum ADA in diagnosis of patients with SNPTB found AUC of 0.9850 (95% CI, 0.969-1.00) which was statistically significant (p<0.001). A cut-off value of serum ADA≥33 IU/L showed sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV and accuracy of 93.55%, 94.87%, 94.87%, 93.55% and 94.29%, respectively to correctly diagnose SNPTB cases.
Conclusion
This study finding stated that serum ADA may be a useful marker to distinguish SNPTB from non-TB respiratory diseases. However, further study with more generalized study population is recommended.