Strangulation of Nuclear Power: Cui Prodest?

Jargin SV

Published on: 2025-08-30

Abstract

The overestimation of adverse effects of nuclear-energy industry leads to its strangulation, supporting appeals to eliminate nuclear power plants (NPPs). These days, the most important consideration against nuclear facilities is that they are potential war targets. Escalation of military conflicts contributes to boosting fossil fuel prices. The Chernobyl accident has been exploited for the same goal. According to our observations, the unofficial directive to exaggerate Chernobyl consequences was issued in the former Soviet Union in the late 1980s - early 1990s, when studies of that kind were started or planned. Apparently, some foreign writers have followed the directive. Several relevant publications are analyzed here. Appeals to dismantle nuclear power plants are in agreement with the interests of fossil fuel producers. Shutdowns of NPPs in Germany make the country dependent on Russia. The decision of the Bundestag on 30 June 2011 to phase out NPPs has paved the way for an end to the commercial use of nuclear energy. Today there are no alternatives to the nuclear power; especially for Europe, where large hydroelectric power stations cannot be built. The fossil fuels will become increasingly expensive, contributing to excessive population growth in fossil fuel-producing countries and poverty elsewhere. In conditions of current political and economical rivalries, radiation safety regulations are exceedingly restrictive and should be revised to become more realistic and workable. Strictly observed realistic safety norms will bring more benefit for the public health than excessive restrictions that would be neglected in the countries with prevailing disrespect for laws and regulations, bringing to the trespassers economic advantages.