Technical and Relational Trails: Robot Headway

San Martino RCMD

Published on: 2021-07-18


The manufacture and relational modes are impressive human abilities, which allow designing and building personal artefacts and let conceiving and implementing social politics. The skills, inventions and communities look as if complex facts, theories and truths have autonomous existence, from which getting inspiration. The two modes are separately analyzed, prospecting cosmic rationality or the godly wisdom, as hidden stimulation, say, inner or upper implications. The study analyses the civilization inspiration, human adventure, providing wellness and progress, with technology revolutions and collective breakthroughs, today, at the critical sustainable-ecology imperatives. Again, the trends may look after sustainable prospects, if the human intelligence can trust in cosmic rationality or godly wisdom.


Manufacture Mode; Relational Mode; Human Intelligence ; Cosmic Rationality; Godly Wisdom ; Ecology ; Globalisation


The civilisation is men’s invention, which adds technology and political constructions, modifying the native resources, towards human friendly settings and conditions. The men devise apparels and homes, manmade attires and dwellings, purposely designed and manufactured; men concoct idioms, markets and governments, to organise societies. The manufacture and relational modes characterise the ‹homo faber› and the ‹homo politicus›, saying that these modes are, perhaps, built-in, spiritual gifts or cosmic features, with transcendent or immanent consistency. The technological and political notions, on the earth, link to men, showing reasoning and imagination attitudes as if spiritual gifts or cosmic assets are steady readings with total consistency. The corporeal manifestations of the reality have parallel abstract descriptions once onlookers and explainers operate, providing observations and narrations. The reality exists and transforms with peculiar laws; the bystanders watch and express in tale what acknowledged. The countersigning of the reality shows witness abilities, not necessarily belong mg to the material backdrop. The reality indorsing can follow different elucidating models:

  • transcendent information: the accounts belong to upper reality, having godly worth,
  • immanent information: the explanations belong to inner reality, with tangible value;
  • contingent knowledge: the justifications establish on human imaging, at mind ranges.

First, the godly dualism separates the spiritual spheres, where intangible processes happen at holy ranks. Second, the forged monism allots coding formats to the information carried by material pieces, so to have data processing by hybrid flows. T Third, the factual dualism look at intellectual by-products, by abstraction and encrypting procedures, with passing readings. The godly dualism is total model, with cognition done by spiritual means; the forged monism qualifies matter by intrinsic information; the factual dualism benefits by conceiving mental worlds. Cognition, narration and justifying options avail of information or knowledge, detached from material backstage manifestations: the accounts are spiritual entities, quality features or imagined traits; the descriptions require sensing and grasping, done at holy or cosmic range (transcendent or immanent aspects), or carried by men (contingent possibility). Thinking and reasoning are men’s chances, assuring aware cognition, with dependent worth. The holy or cosmic tracks, if existent, are intrinsic opportunities, with absolute means. The recourse to not just one, but three models shows that we prefer keeping the openings at parallel range and avoiding biasing views of just witnessing earth’s facts. The holy or cosmic tracks believe that, behind passing phenomena, absolute truths hide, providing wisdom or rationality foundations to the galactic backdrops. Thus, godly wisdom or cosmic rationality is origin of men’s’ thoughts and discerning: the human knowledge recognizes spiritual entities or cosmic qualities, at least, as asymptotic truths, because the galactic backdrops are wise/rational bases. Discernment and judgment seem opposing the mere material transformations and physical alterations, as if decision freedom and creative finding/ruling go behind mere causality, by inspired or inventive logics. The intelligence supplies imaginative options and resourceful cues to discover and select coherent conjectures. We, today, deal with artificial intelligence tools, hard to distinguish from human reasoning, because the apt programming is sufficient enabler of data collection and decision keeping algorithms. Intelligence, roughly, supplies problem-solving ability; all animals share similar skills, to plan their survival; the Latin anima (soul) is root assembling the different talents and aptitudes, with watch and choice wherewithal ice. Thinking and judging, after observing and sorting, belong to immaterial spheres, not to concrete reality. The surrounding does not need abstract narrations to exist; the descriptions are options, when portrayals and reasons are essential features, along different motives:

  • the material stuff ha depending sort, needing upper (holy) causes and creations;
  • the material stuff has inner drives, providing the information for transformation;
  • the material stuff ha autonomy, supplying passing data as justifying elucidations.

The example purposes show how matter and information combine, namely: godly dualism (spiritual rank), forged monism (intrinsic cognizance) and factual dualism (human imagination). The abstract prerequisite is holy cause, inherent quality or fantasy utility, backing the material stuff by upper, inner or passing acts. The galactic environs characterise by universal laws, amid at principled ruling and physical coherence. Godly wisdom or cosmic rationality is edict with upper/inner cogency: both are shall be accepted as galactic truth, consistent with transcendence either immanence faiths, alleged from a priori axioms. Human intelligence, instead, is empirical outcome, with contingent construal, based on a posteriori learnt knowledge. The human intelligence path faces the godly wisdom or cosmic rationality guess, each time, opening fears, if the a priori truths permit devising plausible routes, trusting in absolute facts; the acceptability of a priori theories allows prospecting innovations, even when the hypotheses need many revisions. In the following, the attention focuses on the ‹manufactures› and on the ‹relational modes›; the related suitability vary, if contingent or total frameworks apply. The ensuing discussions collects personal ideas [1], leaving open the dilemmas and the outcomes consequently appear undecided.

Technology Revolutions

The human civilisation typically depends on the exploited technology innovations. The analyses prise the agrarian and the industrial revolutions, when the productivity drastically improved by paradigm discoveries: systematic land cultivation and planned work organisation. Besides, since prehistory, men characterise by the manual proficiency, discovering the manufacture modes, to build clothes and homes. Likened to other animals, the garbed societies need sophisticated manmade inventions and artefacts, to provide tools and gears, needed to devised purposes. The manufacture modes progress from stone age, to copper and to iron ages, with textile devices, specialising threads and fabrics’ production, because of the dexterity and design competences. The existence of manmade items brings in creative faculties: the surrounds expand with new processes and new objects; thoughts and reasoning bring forth inventions and artefacts. To manufacture› just means to do by hands, but the behind mind is understood necessity. The creation of threads and fabrics (or walls and roofs) is trivial, if a priori yielded by godly wisdom or cosmic rationality; it is hard to believe, if a posteriori conceived by human intelligence. The clothing and dwelling artefacts are remote achievements, created in many sites and several peoples, repeating similar canons and effects. The links of manufacture modes and a priori upper or inner attributes are evocative, but gratuitous; the soul (anima) becomes misleading, limiting the spiritual qualities to some living beings. Still, the agentive traits, without planning (and decision) faculties seem questionable, but the intelligence, built on merely a posteriori trials, is conceivable. Therefore, the life and the intelligence, possibly, express earth centred facts, but sharing apt galactic worth, since the universal coherence shall give proof of godly wisdom or of cosmic rationality, supplying agentive-like and cognition-like idiosyncrasies. The manufacture modes are example option. Showing dexterity and inventiveness, without detailing the a priori or the a posteriori aids. The non-exclusion of upper or inner aids tells that the sciences and technologies have absolute bases (are not, just, men’s fantasy) and that the access to the cosmic information is possible. The technology revolutions denote paradigm shifts in the human knowledge, considerably altering the life quality levels. The definition of radical innovation is somehow arbitrary, but conventional consent exists on:

  • the clothing revolution: men use manufacture modes’ skills for dresses and homes;
  • the agrarian revolution: men orderly accomplish farming and upbringing operations;
  • the industrial revolution: men exploit energy and physical sources for enhancement.

The body sheltering seems to have been primary compulsion, leading to the design and development of dresses and dwellings, with the manmade textile and architectural technologies. The innovations have easy accounts, if already upper inspired or inner detailed, i.e., belonging to available galactic information. The rural upbringing and husbandry require tricky programming, to forecast the balanced victualling of people in actual environs. The biology notions need to add to the manufacture modes, before enabling this second revolution. With the new revolution, the innovations aim at enhanced efficiency by thoughtful organisation of the work. The optimal results, readily, identify by the diligent execution of the tasks

  • The manufacture modes typify by intents/skills, aimed at multiple arts and crats;
  • The industrial revolution brands by optimal efficacy of front-end activity planning.

The a priori godly wisdom or comic rationality well supports all three revolutions. The a posteriori human intelligence need problematic trials and the strategies ask trimming adaptations. The reasonable steadiness of results makes preferable the a priori settings; the intelligence approaches may suggest evolution frames, in progress changing the involved societies and the economy/ecology constraints:

  • Clothing revolution: archaic settings of garbed societies, living in aptly built houses;
  • Agrarian revolution: old structure of settled societies, fed by breeding and farming;
  • Industrial revolution: coming setup of open societies, aimed at robot-aided being.

The agrarian societies develop, aiming at local self-sufficient autonomy, availing of the expansive traits of the biology processes. The split-sovereignty settlements are characterizing achievements, with rival nation states managing the worldwide wealth and supremacy. The pace wise fruition is apparent at the different stages, with the manufacture modes’ updating:

  • The dressing conception, with ideation of fabrics, dresses, coats, etc. to cover bodies;
  • The housing formation, with building of suited sheltering lodgings, villages and towns;
  • The productive establishments, with fit parting of tangibles and data processing shops.

The growth starts home centred, grounded on the families and relatives’ activity, without an explicit work organisation, since the extant condition factors suffer of relevant randomly biasing effects: the economy, from oikos (house) and nomos (law), denotes the actually managed spheres: home, town or nation. Sound legality needs validation of the communal budgets, subject to the inter-state hierarchic settings. The home centred regulation becomes critical at the global range: the ‹ecology›, from oikos (house) and logos (talk), indicates the questionable dependence of the growth by universal overall constraints. Thereafter, the work organisation efficiency, applied to manufacture, but, as well, to all productive activities, typifies into several industry steps, to grant suited ecology sustainability figures, according to the following example list:

  • Industry 0, with productivity obtained by manmade energy, with automated control;
  • Industry 1, with making given by on-line workforce and scientific work organisation;
  • Industry 2, with throughput settled by fixed automation and special purpose trapping;
  • Industry 3, with production done by robotic, aimed at adaptive planning and delivery;
  • Industry 4, with provision of products, functions, services or any other robotic deeds;
  • Industry 5, with running of all tangible supplies, under eco-sustainability constraints.

The mentioned technology revolutions prospects stages, mainly, focused on the manufacture modes, in which the hand making is godly/inborn gift or it is pace wise mind by product. The former alternative looks at synthetic hands and mind, with dexterous and thinking proficiency at transcendent/immanent galactic rank. The latter one shall recognise and detail series of steps, letting to enable the new revolution and each time giving the discovered betterments [1-6].

Manufacture Modes and Technical Progress

The synthetic hands and mind are, perhaps, embedded chance of godly wisdom or of cosmic rationality. The alternate analyses justify the manufacture modes by hand making evolution, with aware artificial intelligence inclusion. The two tracks are common reference, even only as implicit leeway, with universal total entrustments, or pace wise constructions, with local contingent evolution:

  • Galactic Centered Way: inner or upper causes (fully or partly) drive the variations;
  • Men Centered Selection: apt decision skill performs (provisional) clever planning.

The synthetic hands and mind questions allow allotting total consistency to contingent human guesses, as if proper robotic gears operate in lieu of front-end workers. The given details cover several sections, to nice results, by human or robot-like aids, say:

  • The peculiar manufacture model, identifying the technical skill needed for progress;
  • The self-active relational model, for the description of formal interpersonal frames;
  • The guidance on technology progression, recalling the steps of industry revolution;
  • The advice on collective breakthroughs, openly detailing the nation and global ones;
  • The guidelines of end-of-life/reclaiming directives for robot chains eco-consistency.

At first, the synthetic hands and mind allow describing the manufacture modes by replacing robots, as if the textile discoveries or architectural implements have, already known, holy or natural spurs. The ensuing results haven even clearer hints, to bring forth the social structures, the technical progression, the political inventions and the ecology warnings. Each time, the absolute worth seems having galactic foundations: we cannot dispute about the truth of results, obtained applying the natural laws; even, the human laws profit by the sharing of implicit upper/inner universal constancy. The imbedded universal class of laws should be a priori attribute, but suited recognition, also, develop by a posteriori qualified agreement, if convergent investigations proofs establish. Then, universal class laws do not distinguish from total evidences: they deserve approval as faiths, supported by the conceivability of apt cosmic rationality or of godly wisdom hypotheses. Deeper analyses about synthetic hands and mind› can move from the total worth allotted to galactic information assembling the physical laws: if the guess is correct, absolute scientific truths and technology discoveries bypass the human knowledge contingency and out-and-out rules and models exist, identifying and describing the surrounds. The conjectures, hinted to justify the existence of galactic centred, not of men centred, manufacture modes, look after finding reasons for the technical progress, based on thorough scientific foundations. The trust in absolute physical laws builds, showing the coherence among forecasts and outcomes, but the hypotheses’ likelihood needs transform in faith in the galactic information detection. In the sketched pictures, the cosmos differs from chaos, beige ruled by causal rationality with clever prediction trends: the associated inner cosmic information grants contributing steadiness; alternatively, the spiritual upper wisdom has in charge current decisions. The rational or wise transforms have immanent or transcendent controls, with a priori galactic settings (surely, also enjoyed by men). The human intelligence, equivalently, ca be a posteriori outcome of intellection, or a priori stimulation by cosmic rationality or by godly wisdom. The technical progress, clothing, agrarian and industrial revolutions consistently have access to the total physical laws, made available as immanent or transcendent galactic information; the manufacture modes, the biology and the activity organization may ensue from absolute truths, no just contingent manmade imagining and resourcefulness. The science and technology are human discoveries, founded on knowledge, the abstract encoding, used to describe and to transmit our experimental observations. The notions are mental ideas, allowing defining the material items, once chosen the wordings (by uttered sounds) and the wrings (by graphic symbols). The ideas transform in ‹knowledge›, after agreed encrypting by (spoken/printed) languages at the interpersonal range of the given tribes or populations. The notions and nations start together: they typify men, compared to other animals; they involve aware abstraction and encoding procedures of collectives. Thus, science and technology are higher instance human attainments of communes, giving the way to the elaborate political relational modes; the manufacture modes, possibly, are lower instance human achievements of individuals, giving the way to dressing, housing and technical inventions, which add manmade objects and services. On the earth, the men are origin of both those modes, but the sophistication of the required accomplishments makes plausible looking after a priori galactic information, with inner or upper causes. The manifestation of manufacture and relational modes, at individual and collective ranges, shows trends, which create technical and political variations, rightly or wrongly, named progress. These occurrences link clearly with human intelligence; the connections with cosmic rationality or godly wisdom are likely guess, to turn into faith, if the trust in total physical laws leads to believe in the existence of galactic information. The guess, typically, involves material spheres and transformations of the surrounds, but, possibly, it extends to interactive spheres and interpersonal operations. The dealings have tangible and mental interfaces, starting higher social instances, with cooperation on conflicting issues. The analyses of how the a priori stimulation by cosmic rationality or by godly wisdom affects the how the a posteriori human intelligence differs: with the lower manufactures’ instances, the total worth of the physical law is straightforward cue.

Progress Myth and Sustainability Questions

The progress combining human accomplishments, with technical attainments and political achievements. The list of manmade undertakings starts to satisfy personal needs and properly distinguishes from all other animals, to include the manufacture modes, exploiting hands dexterity and mind reasoning. The ideation of concrete items and the design profitable goals are social, leading to structured assemblies, with upgrading outcomes, since the human intelligence, precisely, looks at selective choices, distinguishing benefits from downsides. The trends show the increasing life quality of civil societies, say:

  • Home manufacture, by means of spread out domestic and local textile and building jobs;
  • Country produces, using husbandry and upbringing jobs, as diversified fonts of foodstuffs;
  • Mass production, with economy of scale maxi sing productivity with minimal item cost;
  • Customers’ satisfaction enabling economy of scope, optimising the return on investments;
  • Ecology sustainability, with circular planning, aimed at sources’ recovery and depollution.

The manufacture modes, just, supply starting dispositions, having, perhaps, cosmic rationality or godly wisdom inspiring causes. The following stages show work organisation methods, once, not the only results interest, but also processing conditions apply, say, productivity, actual return or earth’s safety. The hands-and-mind activity organisation is enabling feature of the technical progress; the manufacture modes are starting abilities, typically connected with the humankind skill and knowhow deployments, thus, allowing the conventionally recognised technology revolutions:

  • The remote undertakings of garbed societies inhabiting dwellings and settlements;
  • The systematic execution of manmade biology courses, for foodstuff multiplication;
  • The effective control of activity programming, aimed at balanced unreservedness.

The clothing, agrarian and industrial revolutions typify the discovery of abilities, processes and methods, which widen the extant backdrops, adding artefacts, practices and efficacies. The usefulness of these extra facts tell that men apply creative changes to the environs: the acquired knowledge affects the sociability, but, also, supplies operation skills; the evolution potentials are galactic traits, as such, to be included in the cosmic rationality or in the godly wisdom and, possibly, shared by men as creative intelligence via our knowledge. These hints seem agree with technology revolutions caused by inner or upper motives: if true, the human interposition is possibility, but civilisation or progress-like occurrences are natural or holy facts with a priori origins. The technical progress via new artefacts [7],  practices and efficacies is complex outcome of training, notions and awareness, entailing matter and information, with tangible and abstract fallouts. The developed comments on the a priori origins of the progress, in ancient epochs, were leading to godly wisdom, with transcendent causes. In modern epochs, the Darwinism looks after immanent causes, based on cosmic rationality, aiming at optimal, rather than at adaptive goals. Both total descriptions consistently support the progress myth, as if unbound improvements are possible: the former resorts to the laws of the holy reality; the latter presumes the conservativeness at galactic range, to restore earth’s deficiencies. The progress myth is modern parable, lately precluded by the ecology verdicts: in physics, the entropy is thermodynamic constraint of the material reality. Today, the sustainability questions become impending, once acknowledging that the resource exhaustion and the surrounds pollution become critical concern of our planet. The growth incessantly profits from raw stuffs and reject no more useful objects: such demeanour, tolerable with negligible amounts of inhabitants, is unsafe, when big populations involve over-depletion and over-contamination out of the earth’s recovery, instead, they entail to piling up of damages. The growth sustainability requires circular supply chains: the forward logistics have complete backward logistics, so that the earth keeps steady trends, without global lessening or warming drifts [8-15]. Our planer is non-isolated spot of the universe, with energy exchanges (sun’s radiations, etc.), having already undergone climate’s variations (glacial eves, etc.), before reaching men’s friendly weather conditions. The earth/universe connections are galactic information; the men’s falloffs are superposed effects, presently, affecting the global warming; in the future, the planning of relevant actions is, perhaps, feasible, but not yet, even, envisaged. In conclusion, the progress myth might ensue, only, the godly wisdom, via miracles; the cosmic rationality opens queries: if the earth negligibly affects the universe, the entropy remains dominant drift; finally, the human intelligence start a posteriori course by contingency and the progress continuance has no forecasts. The engineering analyses on the progress bring to the sketched preliminary conclusions, when the focus is on the manufacture modes, trying to answer to the question how those skills exist or develop?. The issues remain arguable, because the gratuitous invention of practices and theories does imply total foundation, as fancy thoughts are possible and the later usefulness checks, just allot suitable reliability figures. Moreover, the technology revolutions, since prehistory ages, seem follow coherent deployments, as if suitable galactic information characterizes the universe along rational/wise courses, not left to unpredictable chaos; on the contrary, the right scientific knowledge, from cosmology to biology, assign consistent transformation to the tangible stuffs. The physical laws are full of derails: the electromagnetism, mechanics, thermodynamics, etc. supply models for the quantitate forecasts of the current transformations, according to causal rules. It is difficult thinking that the different predictions are personal conjectures and not true prospects [19; 20]. Then, we deal with total physical laws and our cognition procedures (abstraction and encrypting) shall drop out their initial contingency: the preliminary conclusions may support truths and faiths.

Political Breakthroughs

The human civilisation depends, further than on the programmed technical progress, also, on the enabled political deployments. The exploitation of the surrounds allows getting nourishment and improving the life quality, if the physical laws are available (with due concern of entropy). The enhancement of societies goes on, if fit behavioural law are existing with agreement of each entailed community [21]. Now again, the a priori/a posteriori dilemma appears, conditioning the organisations of collectives, in view:

  • To communicate, inventing dialects/languages and shaping civic/social setups;
  • To transact, negotiating barters and deals for exchange, business and revenue;
  • To consolidate, coordinating and managing people’s assemblies, under rulers.

The relational modes promote the interactive understanding, trade and governance within the assembly, because the acquired learning, agreed rules and passed edicts make possible;

  • Sociable intercourse: colloquial links of parental/friendly approachability interfaces;
  • Fit market format: public endorsement of negotiation determinants and statements;
  • Apt authority setup: official enacting of governmental regulation, with cogent appeal.

So far, the relational modes cover typified interpersonal layers (alliance, legality and ruling) according to different behavioural codes, depending on the allocated statuses:

  • The informal (friendly) sphere allows understanding and interacting with civil traits;
  • The indorsed legality sphere sustains transactions, keeping right business dealings;
  • The official headship sphere brings in the operation autonomy of local assemblies

The three layers move from unceremonious aware contacts by messages sharing known encrypting; then, formal businesses need rituals and legitimacy; finally, nation-states look after autonomous self-sufficiency. The developed relations build formal assemblages, with cultural, economic and governance blending, which operate in parallel, potentially, as sovereign countries and fight for the supremacy. The out coming political setups lead to rival, split-sovereign countries, repeating Darwinism competition, since selfish genes, living beings and nation-states contest each over to conquest vital spaces. The selfishness implies awkward rules: the rival genes of animals need to cooperate at the individual ranges; the rival citizens of countries need to collaborate at the national ranges. The teamwork happens according to the relational modes. Communication, transaction and consolidation request idioms, rules and authority, say, software tools, to typify the citizens of the singled out nations. The men fashion these tools: we have comparable languages, substitute economics and feasible governments; the social setups evolve along ages and, parallel to the technology revolutions, we envisage characterising collective breakthroughs, namely:

  • scattered societies of nomadic tribes, changing homelands to look after foodstuffs;
  • country settled peoples of agrarian societies, with worker-centred industry steps;
  • uniform globalisation, with worldwide contacts and robot-centred industry steps.

The collective breakthroughs hypothesise that the globalisation follows the nation-state age and this could open safe sustainability chances, if the total, inner rationality or upper wisdom, tracks are fit truths. At the collective range, the agrarian and the industrial societies are transition epochs: the former leading to localised split-sovereign nation-state; the latter prospecting the global village, new collective, which avails of global communication, global market and global governance. The worldwide web is software option on hardware potential, affecting the social setups since the all world reduces to local community, removing all barriers. The transitions of the agrarian societies needed to specify the ownership concepts, to settle suited continuity in holding lands; the one of the industrial societies will need to invent operation procedures for robots, n tines of synthetic hands and mind. The relational modes have to face the two transitions, bringing the apt updating to the current social organisations. These changes have the open’s promotion and ruling, but collective courses and breakthroughs have conditioning effect. The ownership of the personal belonging is, conceivably, useful notion from the nomadic tribe’s ages, as suited qualifying aspect. The proprietorship of the collective homes is, probably, obvious issue once these distinguish families and clans. The freehold, up to the ripe harvesting, of the laboured lands is the correct way, to safeguard the agriculture, rightly followed by the preparation of soils for next cycles. The tenure or ownership practices happen in different contexts, which allow formalising the marker spheres, each time, adding objects and titres to trade. After the acquaintance informal layer, the relational modes shall aim at the legal and official levels, allotting interpersonal rights and duties and stating headship/governance rules. The existing external constraints currently shape the formal layers, as shown by the ownership frames; the inner or upper origin of the relational modes is, perhaps, apparent, when looking after the abstraction and encoding choices, which build communication languages by gratuitous wordings and writing.The analyses of the relational modes, however, shall acknowledge the complexity of the political setups, as previously done with the technical snags, to justify cosmic rationality or godly wisdom influences. In the archaic ages, the invention of communication by languages is peculiarity, readily, opened to fitting message redundancy via sophisticated sentences and expounded verdicts. The subsequent formal options are easy stages, with ideas and discriminations already possible using proper idiomatic elements. The old narrations give details of settled civilisations, which date some then thousand years back, with poets and philosophes of the few millennia, in current common sharing. The cultural deployments are education attainments: the languages propagate by parental training; then, simple learning spreads economy and legality ideas; further appraisal teaches headship and governance notions. The relational modes establish by hierarchic way, and the subsequent stages enjoy common idiomatic bases, with joint communication and culture goals [7-12].

Relational Modes and Civilian Advances

The civil advances add the political deployments, to the technical progress. In the sketched survey, these follow with the hierarchic stages of the relational modes, having foundation in factual communication aids that are the human languages. The depiction already distinguishes three layers:

  • Planned dealing, involving friendship agreements and voluntary covenants;
  • Contractual links, presuming private law obligations and promised leaflets;
  • Imperative bonds, rooted in supreme edicts, engaging the all communities.

The basic layer allots high intricacy to the interpersonal contacts and request the long training of babies and children, for their education, before the formal stages of the adulthood. The tuition of groundwork drills have planned learning at childhood and informal (unofficial) utilisation along the maturity life, to keep the sociability abilities. The subsequent stages implement the formal relational frames, building:

  • The sociality constraints, prospecting right behaviours and wicked activities;
  • The business tasks, detailing market regulation and defining money courses;
  • The official onuses, stipulating lands’ exploitation and crafty empowerment.

The overlapping stage has the well-known strong nation-state physiognomy, showing the cooperation of inside citizen and the interstate rivalry, ready, possibly, to operate at the galactic ranges. For centuries, the depiction deserves steady consent, so that the civil advances identify typical interpersonal links:

  • Interpersonal obligations, collected as private rules, for the impartiality regulation;
  • Economic foundation, inventing market and trade options, to simplify goods’ supply;
  • Teamwork establishment, prospecting manufacture effectiveness by standard tasks

If globalisation will start, the interstate rivalry no more run and earth solidarity replaces split-sovereignty by the global village: the official onuses need reinterpreting the governance roles, without independence of local sovereignties. The collective breakthrough with local country settled peoples regularly follows the bottom up procedures of the spot groupings, with native dialects, transformed in official nations. The spot beginning leads to regular societies (compared to the ‹uniform setting› of the global village), which has to create suited imperative bonds to manages the local sovereign states. The bottom up construction and the society regularity make credible the a priori cosmic rationality or godly wisdom origins; thereafter, the appropriate collective breakthroughs shall characterise using the following alternative paradigms:

  • Localism: shaping of regular societies, say, sovereign nation-states and ownership legality:
  • Globalisation: setting of uniform society, say, worldwide village under ecology imperatives.

The localism deals with the recalled three layer relational layers, managing the citizens by private legality for ownership and domestic trade edicts, and the states by public legality for sovereignty and foreign affairs regulations. These formal layers denote lawfulness choices, echoing the informal idiomatic pics: the rules appear to be men’s inventions, enacting behavioural musts, possibly, stated at the holy spheres, or hinted as natural constraints. The ecology imperatives do not exist within exhaustive local independence and the globalisation aspects have separate remarks. The behavioural laws have enforced formats by each notion-state, in agreement with international pacts. The lawfulness, profitably, resort to religions and spiritual principles, to utter absolute reasons: the ‹kings by godly grace› enjoy traditional accounts, legalizing any passed acts and facts. In modem ages, the nation-state sovereignty is truth, allotted as intrinsic attribute to the native meetings; with democracy, the citizens elect parliaments and delegate lawful headship to governments, once constitutional acts fashion indecent local nations. The behaviour lawfulness needs updating by mechanisms, someway, linked to extant rallies and the sovereignty delegation is instant faculty. The hints are enough to show how tricky the matter. In the legal context, the ownership concepts appear yielding critical drifts, not being intrinsic attribute, but to classify relational mode by-product, when inherent disposition exists. The context starts when the agrarian processes safe tenure of accurately labored fields up to harvesting, then, grasslands, meadows, etc. need countryside continuity, not to destroy the improvements. The custody of personal effects and work tools has operative functions; the one of strived lands promote the efficiency of the agronomies. To that purpose, the assigned ownership of individuals or collectives plays essential role, to specify tasks and responsibilities. The private titre widens the intrinsic attribute, adding such personal dispositions; the public titre requests communal accountabilities, if selfishness becomes shared quality of group or nation. The two options naturally coexist, with family cooperation, home economy and country ruling; else, the communism overwhelms private proprietorship, unifying controls in heads or nomenclatures. The relational modes are clear mark that, together, individual and collective attributes typify the presence of the humankind on the negligible planer earth. At first, the men do not perceive the earth/universe lack of balance: we cannot modify the cosmology; the other way, rationality or wisdom, if reliable attributes, do not are human, galactic traits. The relational layers enable the idiomatic communication, legal business and sovereign governments, apparently, on bottom up courses, but, plausibly, on inner or upper hints or spurs. The suggestions or faiths allot total worth to the timely created political sceneries, sovereignty frames and behavioural laws, in the here drafted localism layouts. The natural or godly origins of intrinsic qualities are, perhaps understood hypotheses: the holy is transcendence faith; the innate supremacy is immanence tacit trait of inborn selfishness. The Darwinism presumes innate automatisms to headship, so that the men start with natural hierarchies; intelligence, as well, is unequal and comprehension happens with uneven lies. The relational sets open several tracks: with transcendence, dualism entails godly gifts; with immanence, the forged monism deals with natural gifts; otherwise, with factual dualism, the human education creates intrinsic features (unknown by animals). The first track involves spiritual entities or absolute knowledge; the second and third tracks manage information (quality of matter) and, respectively, human knowledge (fancy concepts). The relational three layers spiritual entities specify different views: the first, as spiritual part; the second, as forged quality; the third, as mind world. In the unlike contexts: the communication idioms are inventions, with divine, fake or imaged foundations; the operation lawfulness is rule, with holy, innate or learned feature; the indorsed sovereignty is headship, with godly, natural or agreed approvals. The civilian advances, within the localism deployments, appear built along bottom up trails; if top down drivers exist, these contribute obvious, tacit or settled spurs, not needing explicit mention. Thus, the language, legality and authority enjoy, usually, timely total worthiness: the ‹nation-state› give regular societies, i.e., closed, structured and governed assemblies. The civilisation regularity repeats inner or upper already assigned patterns, with total logics, provided by rational or wise principles, their cosmic or godly origins are conventional statement. The Darwinism shows the selfishness patterns at genetic, individual and collective ranges; the natural architectures follows inner logics, allotting the genomic, organic and political cooperation of inside structures and the competition at the inter-structure level. The transcendence typifies the holy architectures, allocating absolute headships and hierarches, according divine wisdom. The localism manifests, specifying what is happening on the earth and leaving undefined what rationality or wisdom means elsewhere. The a posteriori contingency narration is alternate method to describe the civilian advance created by the political accomplishments; by that way, the progress moves pace wise, each time selecting advantages and rejecting drawbacks according to the experienced results. The empirical way is astonishing, if wholly responsible to create languages, markers and governments, with words/grammars, laws/economics and leaders/sovereignty. The sophistication of the political arrangements leaves open different problems.

Governance Roles and Teamwork

The scattered tribes, ‹nation-state› and ‹global village› typify peculiar collective breakthroughs, which in time apply the relational modes, binding the individuals of the humankind. The last set setup is hypothesis forecast of the communication, market and control globalisation, whether such layouts shall actually occur. The coming collective breakthrough prospects top down views of the relational layers:

  • The colloquial society, when communication is fundamental interpersonal link;
  • The business society, when economics is dealt with, by legal trade regulations;
  • The political society, when government requires enacting fit official protocols.

The top down approach has justifying evidence, when looking at the activity organisation effectiveness and turning the man-centred in the robot-centred programming. The new top down information refers to computer languages, circular economy and depletion/contamination transparency, with universal chances and effectiveness, in view of substitute processing methods, such as:

  • To communicate, turning local human languages into global robotic instructions;
  • To transact, defining the activity plans and negotiating suited business schedules;
  • To consolidate, enabling synthetic teamwork and cooperation as ecology constraint.

The bottom up completion of closed regular societies cannot is, on the earth, standard option, leading to the human intelligence, even if such outcome directly or indirectly enjoys of cosmic rationality or godly wisdom backups. The said backings, if extant, may differently be active, affecting the surrounds by means of synthetic hands and mind or equivalent overall transformations. These situations may happen top down, not requesting explicit human involvement, if the inner or upper roots are implanted stochastic singularities or gratuitous holy miracles. Besides, the starts of life/intelligence on the earth, on earth and in other places, maybes, are singularities or miracles aimed to the quite special peculiarities, but cosmic rationality or godly wisdom, in general, can manifest by different way, without any anthropological looks. The levelheadedness or the shrewdness and the linked total understanding do not require anthropic specialisms:  the mentioned localism way is, thus, not exclusive; the globalisation might become alternate course of events. The global village might expand as open society, without the need to have borders, to distinguish the given country, from neighboring entities: the whole community, in any case, is subjected to ecology laws, compulsorily requiring the collective sustainability planning. The selfishness of the global village does not look at rival assembly, at the survival of the humankind: the uniform cooperation and reliable frugality are enforced deeds, under unified permanent controls. At the state of facts, it is hard to say if the depiction is realistic or utopic, unless fitting automatisms exist and intrinsic dictatorship forces the uniformity. The issue is depiction, perhaps, biased by localism views; the globalisation requests revising the all interpretations, to offer correct balancing between global communication, global market and global governance. The sketched readings are disputable and only preliminary considerations follow. The global communication has fundamental innovation in the worldwide web; the recourse to computer instructions offers unifying notation, from which developing a common language and replacing the locally used many idioms. The shared encrypting at interfaces obliges the logic compatibility of messages and it is starting point to establish common semantics.  The language localism, possibly, is transitory stage of men evolution; the globalisation stage shall superimpose a unifying communication opening, maybe, keeping inside the many existing cultures. The worldwide web seems to be chance, without drawbacks. The global market has enabling aid in worldwide contacts, if suited logistics exist, without interstate trade fences. The conditioning facts involve private and public laws, from free commerce, to custom barriers. The open traffic benefits of individual ownership and wide cheap offers; the valuable trade grows multination, with removal of peals and tolls. The cross-border trade are qualifying feature, implying interstate treaties, agreeing free exchange conditions; in the past, the autarchy is opposed situation, when high fees protect inside goods against foreign business; recently, zero-mile production is pick as genuine option, instead of exotic items. The market domination over nation-states is political decision, which the local autonomous will, by uniform guidelines, without biasing shelters and privileges; however, the human rights equality has always distorts in genetic and environmental causes, since the natural homogeny do not exists. The split-sovereign nation-states are dubious setup with global market, whether the citizens’ cooperation becomes undue alteration of interstate rivalry; the variation destabilises the local governments, because of the lacks of autonomous decisions. The globalisation is efficient advantage for communication; it offers chances for the business effectiveness; it undermines local indecencies, rising questions on their real consistency, the bottom up way, creating many nation-states, perhaps, has, just, temporary foundation; the political setups shall require revisions, towards different civic organisations. The global governance switches, from the bottom up regulated structures of independent nation-states, to the homogeneity of top down managed, uniform assembly of citizens. The current readings, in the past, distinguishes the peoples, by native race and language; the ethnic parting, clear in cultural terms, is dubious in genetic conditions; it progressively worsens with migration of singles and groups, mixing folks and mores. The hierarchic regularity, with individually allotted skills, duties, orders and rights has acknowledged truths in natural accounts of Darwinism or in spiritual images of transcendence; the plate uniformity, with equally allocated abilities, liabilities, tips and roles seems ideal prospect, rather than realistic occurrence. Presently, the rival closed societies, with genomic ladders or godly grace headship, are widely recognised models; the linked political setups show self-directed nation-states, fighting for headship, with profit of inhabitant. The worldwide uniformity requests new justifying models, without self-ruling competing entities, instead, after the ecology collective breakthrough, compulsory controls shall act, under technical imperatives, even if apt political setups do not have explicit architectures. The over-exhaustion and over-contamination elude the safe progress of the bounded earth: we shall turn to downgrading and decay from the affluent societies, accepting frugality and spare lifestyles and wholly avoiding useless or frill practices. From the ecology breakthrough, the social uniformity entails the governance of the whole ‹global village›: this means that the all citizens undergo like restrictions on resource sparing and pollution avoiding; the ‹global village› has unified controls, applying like constraint everywhere. The globalisation starts new sceneries, deeply modifying the political structure, from multiplying the self-regulating nation-states, to widening a single ‹global village›, under united obligatory rules. The relational modes do not need the overlain layers of private and public legality: communication and market operate in home economy, under ecology coercions, but the interstate biasing effects cannot move the affluence from one to another group of citizens. The non-appearance of local countries coherently shows absence of actual ethnic differences between the global village inhabitants. The natural selection or the godly will provides right foundation for allotted hierarchies and worthy governments; otherwise, democratic polls are nice way to create lawful organisations, within the ecology constraints, clearly assigned by the extant physical laws. In the depiction, the government role wholly modifies, from the free ruling of self-directed closed societies, to the effective coordination of the teamwork in the shared global village. The administration functions have ecology management purposes, without divisive collective objects, aimed at split-sovereign setups. The nation states’ setting presumes the creation of self-sufficient entities, free the choose goals and duties: originally, we suppose that the individuals enjoy this freedom, then, moved to the built closed societies, via usual localism mechanisms. With globalisation, the ecology rejects the original freedom: the earth’s means have bounds; the earth’ recovery is partial; the growth sustainability asks circular economy, with reverse logistics offsetting the forward damages. According to the delineated considerations, the globalisation, with the setting of the uniform society, is not stage ahead, rather necessary innovation, requested by fit ecology imperatives, to switch towards reliable sustainability and retrieval measures.

Civilisation: Aware Creativity

The civilisation starts to promise friendliness and resourcefulness, thus, removing wilderness and hostility from the surrounds: the technology revolutions provide shelters for bodies, food to survive and efficacy in outgoingness; the collective breakthroughs consent political settlements for the social grouping, enabling planned organisations and prearranged doings. It is evident that the men have individual and collective qualities and abilities, which distinguish the already discussed peculiar spheres:

  • The informal (friendly) sphere allows understanding and interacting with civil traits;
  • The indorsed legality sphere sustains transactions, keeping right business dealings;
  • The certified authority sphere brings in the operation autonomy of the local rallies.

The communication by language is human oddness, but the formal spheres are further quandary, showing the links between them and as member of the all; logic hierarchies should exist: settled contracts state the ones; official authorities enact the others. The proper discernibility of private or public conventions provide ratifications and warranties, which assert that passed laws have consistent worthiness and ruling leaders enjoy recognized power. The sated result has three-layer architecture:

  • marginal autonomy: with establishment of peoples, performing aware happenings;
  • split-sovereignty: with shaping of rival nation-state, fighting for profitable headship;
  • social liability: with self-ruled countries exploiting resources by shared conventions.

The layered architecture starts from human autonomy, with the creation of interpersonal communication language, giving detailed descriptions and aware shrewdness. The self-rule consents decisions and actions, provide responsible planning and accountable design; thus, consciousness and ingenuity fully apply, when, on the earth, the civilisation develops, following the given lines, using:

  • Manufacture modes, with intentions building clothes, houses, etc., under ecology safety;
  • Relational modes, with behaviours allowing communication, trade and authority setups.

The inventions and behaviours show imagination, i.e., ideas of objects and processes, before, not present in the reality and actions doing business, management, administration, government, etc. jobs, previously, not done by individuals. The technology and the politics, if not just fancy by-product of human mind, shall belong to the extant tangible reality as inner information, or shall be independent spiritual actuality. The three hypotheses lead to the factual dualism (with contingent knowledge), forged monism (with implicit knowledge) and godly dualism (with absolute knowledge. The second and third guesses allow accessing to total truths, integrating the mere monism by fake information or by using dualism with spiritual reality. The three lines open the many queries, objects of the investigation. The civilisation continuation, now, has to face the globalisation new challenges. The contingent line does not look sure forecasts and the sustainability planning limits to temporary and restricted projections. The total lines believe in certainties; notably, the godly dualism presumes the intangible reality of spiritual acts, with reasoning, judgment and design activities, wholly independent from the tangible reality and the linked laws. The civilisation and progress are, possibly, part of holy designs and miracles are feasible, to reinstate and salvage our little planet, according to the upper wisdom of the spiritual actuality. The forged monism, instead, presumes the cosmic rationality, granting the inherent coherence of the ensuing happenings. As special option compared to mere monism, the forged one accedes to information, instant matter quality, even if just detected as implicit knowledge. The two total lines, notably, enjoy the cognition on the true physical laws, through the spirituality sharing or through implicit knowledge; detection. In the outlined considerations, the cognition procedures and the knowledge roles appear having notable relevance. The perception, thoughts and reasoning are men’s doings, fashioning the mental worlds of ideas, images and notions: these move from felt spurs, with allotted meaning and encoding; they are hybrid facts, with tangible feelings and intangible thinking. With focus on outcomes, we may deal with spiritual entities; remaining at inputs, the moods are undecided stimuli. The sensed marks need being classified, transferred in abstract formats and interpreted by meaningful data: in dualism, the steps are explicit; in monism, they are implicit, but, possibly, detectable by fake readings. The forged monism and factual dualism, perhaps, run parallel: the one without explicit restitution of matter information; the other, picturing fit knowledge as a reasonable compensation of what sensed. The cognition procedures, with dualism, lead at duplicated realities in spiritual or heavenly spheres, either in fancy or intellectual spheres; with monism, .they keep matter-and-information unity, with, possibly distinct detection by abstraction/encrypting way. The factual dualism has empirical evenness: the detected knowledge is depending guess: it needs further proofs by total paths, possessing reliable foundations or just based on plausible faiths. The analyses on the knowledge roles show that the cognition provides comprehension by picturing what observed; the reports are explanations, based on the already agreed scientific descriptions and causal cues, showing the coherence of the all. The approach provides awareness of the expected issues, when alternate forecasts show each one trends; the aware decisions permit choosing profit and progress and avoiding loss and regress, at least, as far as the consciousness actually deals with true and reliable information. The view leads to verify if creativity and aware plans start and maintain the civilisation, i.e., changes grant conscious innovation and decisions, exploiting properly assessed knowledge. The acknowledgments aim at covering the contingent data in total information, basically, presuming the detection of the physical laws along inner or upper procedural chances. These readings are, most of the times, implicit: the total worth of science and technology data is understood fact, giving fitting by-lines by models and simulations. The progress myth develops on such ideas, as if the choice of profits and progress and the avoidance of losses and regress are absolute chances, never modified in the course of the earth’s events and transformations [13-18].

Ecology Catches: The Progress Enquiries

The progress myth is peculiarity, built on men’s centred views. The globalisation, if the guessed collective breakthrough happens, shows cosmos’ centred sights, with paradigms changes in the linked trends. These, as already said, have typifying innovation in the worldwide webs and better specify:

  • Global communication based on computer networking and worldwide web facilities;
  • Global dealing, enjoying worldwide transactions and active multinational enterprises;
  • Global ecology, with equally compulsory consumption and contamination constrains.

The modified prospects are clearly evident at the last level, when the governance refers to environmental constraints, not to sovereignty construal; yet, communication, also, links to self-ruling means, not to human idioms and dealing transactions have to include robot-like partaking. The alterations convert the bottom up men-driven relational modes, in top down prescribed and programmed interactions, obviously enabling apt robot-driven contacts, trades and controls. The globalization promotes transformations, apparent along the industry steps, when the activity planning merges men-driven and robot-driven relational modes, without explicit allocation of duties. The overall planning, always, follows the basic traits:

  • The zeal limits the organization to efficiently perform the exact assigned schedules;
  • The able planning implies checking buyers’ whims to adapt, on line, the delivering.

The diligence and the talent are essential execution qualities; they are present in men and synthetic hands and minds, to provide the timely useful dexterity and dispensation skillfulness. The programming efficiency happens with the industrial revolution and the men/robots transition is already recalled globalization mark. The industrial revolution efficiency improves with productivity, but the economic return, also, depends on the actually placed products and on the side effects of the performed processes. We shall distinguish:

  • Off-line decision logic, fixed by scientific criteria, plus on-process diligent fulfilment;
  • On-line planned selection by robotic equipment, plus able check of the effecting kit.

The industry five-steps specify along known traits, replacing the men, in the productive works/activities, by robotic devices. The (men or robots) operators have to perform settled tasks by designed schedules; at first, the planning looks at manufacturing productivity, with off-line decision logic, using diligent schedules or fixed automation; then, it aims at client’s satisfaction manufacturing, using intelligent agendas. In recent times, Industry 4: moves out of manufacturing, to different other activities, including administrative and management tasks, which also profit with effective intelligent agendas execution; thereafter, Industry 5: face to ecology drawbacks, sustainability, in lieu of efficiency, forcedly requests correct on-line planned controls by robotic schedules. The industry paradigms modify from diligent, to intelligent plans; they widen from manufacturing tasks, too intelligent/management jobs; they, in the past involved men and in future, shall include robots, as standard actors or executors of planned intelligent schedules. The manufacture modes start as peculiar skills, present in the human operators, to enable the invention and building of useful artefacts; they appear, today, turned in synthetic hands and minds, when the allotted tasks are routine schedules, with off-line decision logic or on-line planned selection, with inner rationality or upper wisdom implementation. Men are creative actors; these robots are intelligent executors, when the schedules have already outside specified fetters. The synthetic hands and minds are oddity not less than the manufacture modes: both quirks lead to manmade or robot-made items, with fads, unknown to natural courses. The obtained results are chattels, rising wellness and wealth, which add to existing stuffs, resorting to inner or upper settled schedules. The twist entails the scientific foundation of technologies, as already noticed; parallel oddness repeats with the relational modes, when the benefits are obvious issue of political deployments, leading to regular societies and hierarchic setups for contacts, legality and governance. The ecology concerns promote impressive alterations of the previous, with the collective breakthrough to provide proofs of the environmental decay. The words global ecology denote that the alterations, which happen on the earth, are not neutral and the side effects pile up, yielding to reduction of resources and to contamination of the environs: the global upshots, mainly, limit to the manmade or robot-made changes of the natural wilderness that assure the men’s friendliness to the civilisation. Actually, this specification is a bit vague; our earth is not isolated system: it interacts, exchanging energy (solar radiation) and the climate modifies along ages, so that the life-safe conditions are, possibly only, temporary. The global upshots, thus, are measured ecology drift, but we do not know the natural drifts and if critical events might happen due to galactic reasons. These ecology upshots, summing up, limit to assess anthropocentric impacts. The ecology dilemmas start with globalizations: the worldwide interaction and economy affect the social assembly, removing the political barriers: the nation-states and linked local rights oppose to cooperation and scale benefits; the global village is open society with citizens and without foreigners. The communal affluence has to undergo series of options and these occur without local governmental directives, say:

  • Home economy, supplying essential foodstuffs, personal belongings and basic services;
  • Mass production, aimed at scale economy of maxi sing productivity with minimal cost;
  • Scope economy for customers’ satisfaction, optimising the return on the investments;
  • Frugal economy, for ecology sustainability, minimising exhaustion and contamination.

The human oddities do not stop at the material interface, with the idea to use and abuse of the extant stuff according to the personal will; they repeat at the interpersonal range, when usage/exploitation turns in fact, having inner/upper truth or decided faculty, due to:

  • The existence of natural constraints already stated within the cosmos’ information;
  • The assignment of the specific compulsions, correctly settled as heavenly regulations;
  • The agreed instructions enacted by the community, for the right everyone’s conduct.

The explicit inner/upper conditions have actual implementation by synthetic hands and minds, possibly directly managed or ultimately inspired by cosmic or heavenly inputs; the last line remains at occurrences and assumes the collective involvement of individuals, to get critical proficiencies. The progress enquiries have complex answers, presuming quizzical gifts, manufacture and relational modes for personal chattels and collective settings; otherwise, believing in cosmic rationality or in godly wisdom as effective foundation of the human intelligence, the apparent origin of our amazing civilisation.

Recovery Quest: The Eco-Sustainability Quiz

The humankind and the linked civilisation are awkward events, occurring in the insignificant earth, hard to justify, unless suited galactic motives exist, to explain the reasonability of such achievements, basically, due to pre-existing universal facts, such as cosmic rationality or godly wood. These alternate faiths, but, even without explicit mention to the faiths, the generic understanding exist that the human intelligence safely looks at improvements and avoids drawbacks. If correct, we easily list example practices in the field:

  • Even manufacture areas, developing many instances, unmanned factory included;
  • Lifelong maintenance and management of delivered artefacts, by on-process acts;
  • Continuous care and repair, with service coverage and repair executive handling;
  • Logistic supervision, performing monitored overhaul, with sure peripheral bargain;
  • Facility provision and regulation, with real-time supervision and practical controls;
  • Utility distribution makeup, granting steady supply and enduring manoeuvre aids;
  • reverse logistic, to fulfil circular processing cycles, to zero litter and spoil planning.

The rescue mission starts minimising the castoffs and strewing habits; the retrieval objects, first, request extra duties (and added costs in the original supply chains), since throwaways and messes turn into illegal acts. The lawfulness becomes more intricate question, not just linked to given motion-states, but directly affecting the individuals. Besides, the national biased legalities, favouring their citizens, define dishonest, allowing unauthorised profits. With the globalisation, the fairness needs redefined rules; the old legality specifications, by inner (natural), upper (holy) and elective (democratic) is questionable; say:

  • Countries enjoy hierarchical supervision, with planned manufacture directives,
  • peoples have intrinsic governmental structures, with legitimacy and kingships;
  • citizens benefit of unified management by operational authenticity officialdom.

The split-sovereign nation-states are not self-sufficient and their independence is abusive, when it affects the safe survival of the overall humankind. The regularity of rival countries is, just, temporary political setup and the linked multiple backings are, perhaps, misleading signs: biology and spirituality are not only earth-centric; the democracy does not obviously imply autonomous closed societies. The uniformity of the global village is plausible setting, which allows unbiased social layouts, at widespread stability; it avoids the need of ideal political theories (free and equal citizens, when biology says diversity), since. In the global village, the freedom or autonomy is subject to ecology. Indeed, opposed to the bottom up regularity, the top down uniformity requires overall conditions, deprived of localism orientations:

  • The technology innovation empowerment, by manufacture modes of men or robots;
  • The legality acts, using the relational modes to build structures, with ordered setups;
  • The global constraints, if the ecology constraints affect the earth’s current resources

The structures create an open society, without local kingships; once again, agrarian ownership affects the land legal partition, with global registrations to invent; over again, globalisation shall deal with the joined managing of the men/robot activities, as integrated administrative/business incumbents. The wellness and affluence, in any case, build combining mechanical and clerical works, increasingly performed by robots and computers, without front-end men. Integrated synthetic hands and minds progressively achieve the routine activities, with inclusion of all recovery requests, following standard means, such as:

  • One-way update: changes directly link to altered downgrading with stabilising rescue;
  • Automatic retrieval: recoups develop via planned instruction and training of citizens;
  • Synthetic settings: variations add and programmes have inner/upper continuity tasks.

The retrieval after failure, condition-monitored maintenance and built-in preservation are usual methods, which assure lifelong up keeping, so that the delivered deal fulfils litter and discard treatments. The control and monitoring of rejects are fundamental must, but the ecology sustainability entails limits on depletion and on pollution, which never the natural earth’s recapture and salvage capabilities. The progress safety, thus, requires control and monitoring of forward and backward logistics, i.e., circular supply chains, without altering the extant earth’s settings. These figures, as already noticed, have loose assessments, with overall galactic models assuming proper steadiness, at least, for our solar system. The space missions, from earth, might enhance future exchanges, but are currently negligible. The eco-sustainability, necessarily, limits at rescue’s prospects, by balancing backword logistic plans. The hypothesised forecasts, however, are faulty: the complementary corrections are impossible: the physical equations include entropy irreversibility; the circular supply chains do not exist in the world we know. The eco-sustainability quiz has, possibly, answers if differently approached, looking at the disparity between the acknowledged phenomena:

  • The earth is negligible detail of the universe and shall share the courses of the all;
  • The galactic truths, on what observed, credibly enjoy rationality or wisdom traits.

On these facts, the men’s adventures, certainly, build on human intelligence, but this happens, because we have, on the backdrop, the cosmic rationality or the godly wisdom. The eco-sustainability puzzle, from this point, resorts to total truths, once acknowledged; then, we can try to obtain depictions and forecasts. The analyses move from ‹manufacture› and ‹relational› modes, within human contingency, and, readily, we conjectured the plausibility of absolute foundations for the scientific and the behavioural descriptions. The technical accounts propose typical technology revolutions; the political stories prospect example collective breakthroughs; together, they put forward the manmade profits of the civilisation, instigating the progress riddle by the global ecology requests. Along the ages, three typifying political setups appear:

  • Human marginal presence of scattered familiar groups and nomadic tribes, with loose rules;
  • Spit-sovereign nation-states, competing on earth for leadership, with agreed treaties;
  • Uniform global village, under enforced exhaustion and pollution ecologic constraints.

The last is quizzical forecast, compulsorily shaped by the globalisation: the civic arrangements are peculiar human invention, started without public formats, when the humankind had negligible attendance and soon formalising fitting social systems, having citizens, subject to private and public rules, enacted by sovereign nation-states. With globalisation, the passing of total laws by sovereign authorities becomes Utopia: the all individuals need fulfilling the ecology obligations: contrasting public law claims are garbage, being noise or nonsence opposing human will to natural courses. The globalisation implies revising the relational layers, with, at the third one, global constraints, imposing, as said, the ecology synthetic directives. The free will, independence and sovereignty are contingent traits, when applied au the individuals and the collectives: the global village cannot enact ecology incompatible laws: they are gibberish or boloney. However, if our contingent pictures have cosmic or godly backdrops, we acknowledge to never affect the universe; the trust in the rescue and salvage galactic options allows our sharing of similar sorts, if at earth range, as well, the ecology constraints follow their due course. The views offer preliminary hints: the total worth of our scientific theories and physical laws is understood truth, then, similar facts apply, supporting faiths and kinked conjectures. The considerations stop at initial hints: globalisation, itself, is clear-cut changeover and the linked robotic facilities open queries.  The hints already permit to evaluate that contingent/total the dilemma starts further critical demands.


The manufacture and relational modes are peculiar human talents, enabling technical improvements and political deployments, which enhance friendliness and worthiness of the surrounds. The sophistication and complication of the accomplishments advocate verifying the outcomes’ reliability and authenticating cause and origins of the betterments. The confirmations lead to castoff the contingent implementations, achieved by human intelligence, in favour to the total attainments, reached by cosmic rationality or godly wisdom. In the investigations, the passing-vs.-absolute accounts show the changes occurring along the ages, along with technology revolutions and collective breakthroughs; presently, ecology facts open critical fears, due to:

  • Globalisation: the populations enjoy worldwide contacts and trade, in overcrowded land;
  • Sustainability: depletion and pollution need warning on allowed consumption and litter.

The switch from nation-states to global village deeply modifies the extant civil habits, to manage after removal of the political setups; the individual and social rallies shall follow uniform constraints, selected in view of the agreed repossession goals. These retrieval estimates are technical figures, not political, choices and the local groups do not have decisional freedom. The globalisation and sustainability are still object of disputes; leaving all arguments undecided, in the conclusions we prefer summarising critical topics about the total attainments, previously specified as monism, either dualism interpretations. The monism states that the reality is merely corporeal and the information is quality of the matter. The dualism states that we have parallel material and spiritual realities, the one with tangible transformations, described by physical laws; the other with abstract courses, styled by holy rules. The accounts and rulings are abstract readings, with thinking onlookers; these, by dualism, enjoy spiritual-like statuses; by monism, they are intrinsic function, even when apparent restitutions provide cognition-like outcomes. On earth, the cognition is men’s peculiarity: manufacture and relational modes are monism aspects, linked to surrounds and to folks; however, different other cognition-like processes may exist, due to galactic laws. The human perception requires abstraction and encrypting operations, sensing the input and allotting the identifying cipher to the feeling. The encoded script is abstract message, meaningful, whatever the carrier. We can transom given tangible pieces, into different ones, according to specified instructions: beginning, process and result describe by information, which gives the instant attributes of fit singled out carriers. The account is hybrid, showing information detection and information flows, parallel to matter processing: the all is forged monism; it is necessary defining the data recognition and data-treating trail. The mere monism does not include cognition; furthermore, if the civilisation entails progress, this shall innovate, compared to the deterministic galactic background: the cosmic rationality implies the access to real information (implicit knowledge); moreover, the already outlines narrations open the way to synthetic hands/minds granting rescue and salvage, when the earth’s figures should approach critical values. The spiritual reality offers direct ways to understand and to explain the material world; the incorporeal contents assemble ideas, concepts, judgments and narrations, say, the mental domains of knowledge. The soul or anima belongs to spiritual spheres and the animals, living beings, enjoy of the spiritual abilities of thinking and reasoning; this reading is deceitful: soul and spirit, perhaps, remain in holy spheres [22]; thinking and reasoning are mental functions of the physical reality. With that disunion, judgments and narrations with all other intellectual activities do not need spiritual endorsements and they moves to the contingent domains of the human intelligence. The soul and spirit, as said, might be transcendent constituents, with absolute knowledge, defining the total spheres of the goody dualism. The depictions follow, still today, standard viewpoints, leaving out abstraction and encoding as intellectual functions. With goody dualism, thoughts have access to the spiritual reality, with absolute ‹knowledge› and total divine and physical laws. The factual dualism replaces the spiritual, by the fancy mental worlds, having contingent ‹knowledge› and fantasy interpretations of timely done observations, followed by the usual cognition steps. The alternate to synthetic hands/minds offer rescue and salvage, when the godly wisdom directly acts by miracles. The three models, forged monism, goody dualism and factual dualism are mutually exclusive. The last has realistic appropriateness with experiential evidences at the different steps; it, also, opens queries, making plausible addressing the other models. The first shows ‹knowledge› demands: even if we accept the extant cognition function, the direct access to true galactic information asks faith; the second needs faith in the transcendent spiritual reality. In monism, the information ha hardware (on carriers) processing; entropy increases and it is hard explaining the meaningfulness of the carried coded data. In dualism, the incorporeal flows belong to holy or intellectual domains, asking belief for the forms and imagination for the latter. The detected physical laws provide trustful backing with forged monism or goody dualism, if the said explaining or belief is all right; the result is often an unspoken assumption for current technical implementations.


  1. Michelini RC, Acaccia G, Molfino R. Design of intelligent logistics for factory automation, IFIP Workshop on Factory Automation, Invited Lecture, Tokyo. 1987; 19-21: 184-208
  2. Michelin RC, Crenna F, Rossi GB. Diagnostics for monitoring maintenance and quality manufacturing. CRC Press, Boca Raton. 2001; 2: 2.10.01-2.10.62.
  3. Michelini RC, Acaccia GM, Callegari M, Molfino RM, Razzoli RP. Computer integrated assembly for cost effective developments, Leondes CT. Edition. CRC Press, Boca Raton. 2001; 5:2.7.01-2.7.66.
  4. Michelini RC, Kovacs GL. Lifecycle eco-services for sustainability, Int. J. Service Science & Management Research, SSMR. 2013; 2: 48-56.
  5. Michelini di San Martino RC. Anthropic advances: gobal robot driven rescue, Int. J. of robotic engineering. 2020; 5:1-15.
  6. Michelini di San Martino RC. Manufacture paths: robotics & sustainabilty, in M.A. Mellal, d., Advanced Manufacturing: Progress, Trends and Challenges, Nova Sci., New York. 2020.
  7. Michelini RC, Acaccia GM, Callegari M, Molfino RM, Razzoli RP. Instrumentsl robot design with application to manufacture, Leondes CT. Edition Computer Integrated Manufacturing, CRC Press, Boca Raton. 2001; 7:
  8. Michelini RC, Razzoli RP. Product-service eco-design: knowledge-based infrastructures, Intl. J. Cleaner Production, Elsevier. 2004; 12: 415-428.
  9. Michelini RC, Razzoli RP. Anthropoid odds: robotics & cognitive revolution, Intl. J. Engineering Research & Management, IJERMS, Eclat Research Pub. 2014; 1:177-185.
  10. Michelini RC. Economy plans and growth features, Int. J. Higher Education of Social Science, HESS. 2015; 8: 37-48.


  1. Michelini di San Martino RC. The relational trails to sustainability. Intl. J. Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Corporate Social Responsibility. 2017; 2: 1-.14.
  2. Michelini di San Martino RC. Progress bases: biology and cognition, Intl. Robotics & Automation J. 2018; 4:358-366.
  3. Michelini RC, Razzoli RP. Progress continuance sustainability, American Journal of Industrial and Business Management AJIBM. 2015; 5: 829-838.
  4. Michelini di San Martino RC. The intellect depoyment: creation of civic modes. Int. J. Advanced Information Science and Tecnology. 2015; 16: 57-69.
  5. Michelini di San Martino RC. The relational trails to sustainability, Intl. J. Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Corporate Social Responsibility. 2017; 2: 0-14.
  6. Michelini di San Martino RC. Civilisation modes and ecology constraints. Intl. J. Historical Archaeology & Anthropological Sciences. 2018; 3: 803-812.
  7. Michelini di San Martino RC. Business sustainability and frugal chances. Int. J. of robotic engineering. 2018; 2: 1-11.
  8. Michelini di San Martino RC. Humankind engineering and management: robotic track, Journal of Robotics and Automation. 2013; 3: 83-98.
  9. Michelini di San Martino RC. Progress queries and sustainability: basic views. Intl. J. Clinical Studies & Medical Cases. 2020; 6: 21-29.
  10. Michelini di San Martino RC. Robot-like construal and civilisation, Client Periodic Quarterly Medicine. 2021; 12:1-17.
  11. Michelini di San Martino RC. Progress management and ecology sustainability, Int. J. of Medical and Clinical Studies. 2021; 4: 1-15.
  12. Michelini di San Martino RC. Manufacture/relational modes: robotic sustainability, Intl. J. Research Studies in Science, Engineering & Technology. 2021; 6: 9-22.