Comparison of Micronutrient Levels in Pregnant Mothers with Gestational Diabetes and Non-Diabetic

Nafiseh P, Ashraf M, Shah FA and Reza S

Published on: 2020-12-24

Abstract

Background: Gestational diabetes is a multifactorial disease that genetic and environmental factors affect insulin sensitivity. This study was designed with considering the importance of micronutrients in carbohydrate metabolism.

Methods: The present case-control study was performed on 100 pregnant mothers referred to Imam Reza Hospital in Mashhad, Iran. Fifty pregnant women with gestational diabetes according to the American Diabetes Association guideline were considered as the case group and 50 non-diabetic pregnant women were in the control group. Maternal demographic information were recorded in the checklist. Serum levels of zinc, copper, selenium and chromium were measured in both two groups. After data collection, they were processed with spss16 software.

Results: The mean age of diabetic and non-diabetic pregnant mothers was 32.33 ± 5.92 and 26.32 ± 5.38 years respectively, and their mean weight was 82.87 ± 10.81 kg in case and 73.18 ± 10.6 kg in control group. Maternal weight and age in the gestational diabetes group were significantly higher (both p < 0.05).There was a significant difference between the case and control groups in terms of family history of diabetes in first-degree relatives, history of formula fed mothers during infancy, gravid > 3 and, low gestational age so that were more common in women with gestational diabetes (p < 0.05(. In contrast to chromium, serum levels of zinc, copper and selenium were higher in the gestational diabetes group.

Conclusion: No significant relation was observed between serum zinc, copper, chromium and selenium levels with gestational diabetes.

Keywords

Micronutrient level; gestational diabetic mothers; Non diabetic mother

Introduction

Pregnant women suddenly or for the first time during pregnancy develop glucose intolerance, which is called gestational diabetes [1]. Insulin-dependent diabetes and gestational diabetes both cause problems for the neonates including congenital defects; increased obstetric complications; increased birth trauma in the neonate; and heart, respiratory, renal and  cerebral complications; metabolic disorders (hypoglycemia, hypocalcemia, hyperbilirubinemia); coagulation disorders; and polycythemia. These factors have a significant effect on neonate mortality and morbidity [2,3]. Therefore, recognizing the effective factors in diabetes and controlling them, can prevent or reduce the incidence of complications in the neonate. A wide range of vitamins, minerals and nutrients are effective in regulating blood glucose and adding some of these micronutrients to the diet of diabetics can reduce the damage caused by the disease. Chromium supplementation in humans has improved glucose tolerance and leads to lower fasting blood sugar, increased insulin function [4]. Zinc has also been a key factor in production of insulin by beta cells and has protective effects against the destruction of these cells. Its deficiency is a predisposing factor for diabetes and is associated with undesirable effects on the fetus [5,6]. Selenium is another micronutrient that as an essential element plays an important role in the function of antioxidants such as glutathione peroxidase [7]. On the other hand, due to the structure of insulin like, its anti-diabetic function has been proposed [8]. In recent years, human and animal evidence has shown a significant relation between copper levels and abnormal glucose metabolism [9]. According to the importance of these micronutrients, we decided to study the levels of selenium, chromium, zinc and copper in pregnant women with gestational diabetes compared to healthy pregnant women.  

Materials and Methods

The present case-control study was performed on 100 pregnant mothers referred to Imam Reza Hospital in Mashhad, Iran. After the approval of the project in the ethics committee of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences with the code of ethics fifty healthy pregnant women were considered as control group and the case group included 50 pregnant mothers who were defined as gestational diabetes by definition. For women with gestational aged 24-28 weeks, glucose tolerance test was performed after 8-14 hours of fasting and according to the gestational diabetes was diagnosed after drinking a solution containing 75 grams of glucose. Normal results in level of fasting blood glucose <5.1 mmol / L (92 mg / dL) at baseline, <10.0 mmol / L (180 mg / dL) at 1 h, <8.5 mmol / L (153 mg / dL) at 2 h. Was defined and if one or more of the tests in pregnant women were abnormal, it was specified as gestational diabetes [10].Conscious consent was obtained from them to participate in the study. Maternal demographic information including age, weight, height as well as parity, positive family history of diabetes in first-degree relatives, employment and history of other diseases and consumption of formula during infancy were recorded in the checklist. To prepare a sample from both case and control groups, 6 cc of blood was taken from peripheral arteries and poured into a dry tube. Its serum was separated and frozen and at the end of collecting the samples, all of them were measured in terms of micronutrients including zinc, copper, selenium and chromium. Sampling was done at the time of maternal visit and before delivery room. In this way, every mother with gestational diabetes who referred to the hospital for delivery, after obtaining the consent to participate in the project, a blood sample was taken from her just before delivery to check for micronutrients and at the same time, a sample was taken from a healthy pregnant mother who referred for delivery as a control group before labor. After data collection, they were processed with spss16 software and with t-test, Mann-Whitney and frequency distribution were analyzed. P value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The mean age of diabetic and non-diabetic pregnant mothers was 32.33 ± 5.92 and 26.32 ± 5.38 years respectively which is higher in diabetic mothers (p <0.01). Indeed their mean weight was 82.87 ± 10.81 and 73.18 ± 10.6 kg, respectively, which was significantly higher in diabetic mothers than non-diabetics (p <0.01) but this difference was not significant in maternal height (Table 1).

Table 1: Comparison of mothers' characteristics in case and control groups.

Variable

Case group

Control group

P value

Maternal age (year)

32.32±5.92

26.32±5.38

< 0.01 *

(mean ± sd)

Maternal weight (kg)

82.87±10.81

73.18±10.6

< 0.01  *

(mean ± sd)

Maternal height (cm)

160.82±3.56

161.54±3.86

0.3 *

(mean ± sd)

Having a job

4(8%)

1(4%)

0.2**

Occupation N(%)

Gravid >3  N(%)

13(26%)

10 (5%)

0.01**

History of formula feeding mother's infancy N(%)

4 (8%)

0

0.04**

Familial history of diabetes N(%)

11(22%)

1(2%)

0.02**

History of mother's disease N(%)

48(96%)

49(98%)

0.29**

gestational age <37week

10(20%)

3(6%)

0.01**

N(%)

There  was a significant difference between the case and control groups in terms of family history of diabetes in first-degree relatives ,history of formula fed mothers during infancy , gravid > 3  and low gestational so that were more common in women with gestational diabetes (p < 0.05).

Serum levels of zinc, copper, selenium and chromium between the two groups of gestational diabetic and non-diabetic pregnant mothers were compared, but there was no significant difference between two groups (p> 0.05) (Table 2).

Table 2: Comparison of micronutrient levels in case and control groups.

Variable Case group Control group P value
Copper (micg/l) 1671.14±336.15 1665.60±441.61 0.8*
(mean ± sd)
Selenium (micg/l) 98.20±22.82 94.68±17.84 0.3*
(mean ± sd)
Zinc (micg/dl) 69.2 67.57 0.58**
medium
Chromium (micg/l) 0.63 0.67 0.65**
medium

 

Discussion

Gestational diabetes is a multifactorial disease including genetic and environmental factors which affect insulin sensitivity [11]. Several studies have reported obesity and maternal weight gain are higher risk of gestational diabetes and preeclampsia [12]. The results of present study also showed that the pregnant women with gestational diabetes had more weight than the control group. In addition, we indicated in our study that the mean age of mothers in the group with gestational diabetes was significantly higher than the control group. This finding was consistent with previous studies and maternal age over 30 years was reported as a risk factor for gestational diabetes [13,14]. In other words, the same as other studies maternal weight gain and age increase the risk of gestational diabetes. Our research showed that factors such as gravid more than 3, formula fed mothers during infancy, family history of diabetes and preterm birth in gestational diabetes group were significantly more than non-diabetic mothers. In a meta-analysis published in 2017, a positive family history of diabetes was identified as one of the most important risk factors for gestational diabetes [15].

Abu-Heija showed that with increasing parity, the incidence of gestational diabetes will increase, so that the incidence of gestational diabetes increased from 3.5% in nulliparous women to 14.6% in women with parity greater than 4 and these results are consistent with ours [3]. In our study also parity greater than 3 was significantly associated with gestational diabetes. In results of Patelarou in a systematic review has been observed that short periods of breastfeeding or lack of breastfeeding will be a risk factor for type 1 diabetes in later life [16], but we also found this association with gestational diabetes. Some studies have expressed that mothers with gestational diabetes were at increased risk for preterm labor and birth of premature neonate [17], it was the same as other studies. It should be known that copper, zinc, selenium, iron are essential components of enzymes such as glutathione peroxidase, Cu / Fe cytochrome C oxidase, or different types of superoxide dismutases and all of them are important in the body's antioxidant defense. On the other hand, these elements are also involved in glucose metabolism [11].

Zinc is mentioned as an important element for the synthesis of insulin hexamer and reducing the severity of insulin resistance and diabetes [18]. There is evidence of an increased need for zinc during pregnancy. Mishu reported a significant difference between zinc levels in women with gestational diabetes and the control group [19]. Nevertheless, in our study, serum zinc levels in mothers with gestational diabetes were higher than in the control group mothers, but this difference was not significant. Moghadam and colleagues also did not observe a significant relation between zinc levels and gestational diabetes [20]. The results of our research, despite the larger sample size, were consistent with the study of Hamdan. They also did not report a significant correlation between zinc levels in women with gestational diabetes and non-diabetic. But, the remarkable point in their study was that the two groups were well matched in terms of maternal age, parity, gestational age, and hemoglobin and body mass index [21]. Our results are the same as others in Iranian studies. Chromium is also a micronutrient that has played a key role in carbohydrate metabolism and has been mentioned as a stimulator of insulin production signals. In the study of Akhlaghi and his colleagues, like ours, the level of chromium in mothers with gestational diabetes was lower than the control group. But the results did not show a significant relation between the levels of this micronutrient in the case and control groups [11]. Numerous evidences demonstrate that serum selenium levels decrease during pregnancy [22,23]. But the results of investigations on the association between selenium levels and gestational diabetes are contradictory [24]. Some studies have shown that women with gestational diabetes have lower serum selenium levels than non-diabetic pregnant women [8,25]. However Bleys showed that serum selenium levels in people with diabetes were higher than control group, therefore, in population such as the US with sufficient serum selenium levels, selenium supplementation was not recommended to prevent primary or secondary diabetes [26]. It seems that the results of our study are consistent with it and in our society, the serum level of selenium in diabetic women is higher than non-diabetics. This is also true in another research conducted in Iran [11], but to generalize this issue, investigations with a larger sample size are required. Contradictory, in a systematic review which was performed in 2014 serum selenium concentrations were significantly lower in women with gestational diabetes than in the non-diabetic group, but did not show a cause-and-effect relation between selenium levels and gestational diabetes [24]. Although Liu and colleagues found selenium deficiency to be common among Chinese women, their findings suggested that low levels of selenium in early pregnancy was not a strong risk factor for gestational diabetes and preterm birth [27]. Copper is another element in the body that is essential for normal human physiology and the function of 30 proteins involved in metabolism, including superoxide dismutase, ceruloplasmin, and cytochrome c oxidase and dopamine beta-hydroxylase [28]. In the meta-analysis of Qiu, Serum copper levels were higher in diabetic patients than in healthy individuals [29]. In our study, serum copper levels were higher in mothers with gestational diabetes than in non-diabetic mothers and was in agreement with the study of Li et al ,but in their study, this difference was significant, which may be related to its larger sample size [9]. One of the limitations of our research was that dietary information for pregnant mothers in both groups was not available so that we could analyze the relation between nutritional factors and plasma micronutrient levels.

Conclusion

This study indicated that the levels of micronutrients such as zinc, copper, chromium and selenium in the two groups of diabetic and non-diabetic pregnant mothers were not significantly different. Which is the same as other studies in Iranian population, it may probably be due to diet, race, and other unknown cause, so it seems that studies with a larger sample size and multicenter along with a detailed evaluate of mother's diet is needed to generalize this issue in our society, and then the use of supplements containing these micronutrients during pregnancy should be reconsidered.

References

  1. Punthakee Z, Goldenberg R, Katz P. Diabetes Canada Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee. Definition, Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes, Prediabetes and Metabolic Syndrome. Can J Diabetes. 2018; 42: S10-S15.
  2. Jang H-J, Kim H-S, Kim S-H. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in Korean women with type 2 diabetes. Korean J Int medic. 2018; 33: 1143-1149.
  3. Abu-Heija AT, Al-Bash MR, Al-Kalbani MA. Effects of maternal age, parity and pre-pregnancy body mass index on the glucose challenge test and gestational diabetes mellitus. J Taibah University medical sci. 2017; 12: 338-342.
  4. Swaroop A, Bagchi M, Preuss H, Zafra-Stone S, Ahmad T, Bagchi D. Benefits of chromium (III) complexes in animal and human health. The Nutritional Biochemistry of Chromium (III). Elsevier. 2019; 251-278.
  5. Poudel R, Bhusal Y, Tharu B, Kafle N. Role of zinc in insulin regulation and diabetes. J Social Health and Diabetes. 2017; 5: 83-87.
  6. Moghimi M, Ashrafzadeh S, Rassi S, Naseh A. Maternal zinc deficiency and congenital anomalies in newborns. Pediatr Int. 2017; 59: 443-446.
  7. Ghaemi SZ, Forouhari S, Dabbaghmanesh MH, Sayadi M, Bakhshayeshkaram M, Vaziri F, et al. A prospective study of selenium concentration and risk of preeclampsia in pregnant Iranian women: a nested case–control study. Biological trace element Res. 2013; 152: 174-179.
  8. Mueller AS, Pallauf J. Compendium of the antidiabetic effects of supranutritional selenate doses. In vivo and in vitro investigations with type II diabetic db/db mice. J nutritional biochemistry. 2006; 17: 548-560.
  9. Li P, Yin J, Zhu Y, Li S, Chen S, Sun T, et al. Association between plasma concentration of copper and gestational diabetes mellitus. Clinical Nutrition. 2019; 38: 2922-2927.
  10. American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes—2018. Diabetes care. 2018; 41: S13-S27.
  11. Akhlaghi F, Bagheri SM, Rajabi O. A comparative study of relationship between micronutrients and gestational diabetes. ISRN obstetrics Gynecol. 2012; 2012.
  12. Hedderson MM, Williams MA, Holt VL, Weiss NS, Ferrara A. Body mass index and weight gain prior to pregnancy and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. American J obstetrics and gynecol. 2008; 198: 409. e1- 409. e7.
  13. Nielsen KK, Kapur A, Damm P, De Courten M, Bygbjerg IC. From screening to postpartum follow-up–the determinants and barriers for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) services, a systematic review. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2014; 14: 41.
  14. Jafari-Shobeiri M, Ghojazadeh M, Azami-Aghdash S, Naghavi-Behzad M, Piri R, Pourali-Akbar Y, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of gestational diabetes in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Iranian J public health. 2015; 44: 1036.
  15. Moosazadeh M, Asemi Z, Lankarani KB, Tabrizi R, Maharlouei N, Naghibzadeh-Tahami A, et al. Family history of diabetes and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome. Clinical Research and Reviews. 2017; 11: S99-S104.
  16. Patelarou E, Girvalaki C, Brokalaki H, Patelarou A, Androulaki Z, Vardavas C. Current evidence on the associations of breastfeeding, infant formula, and cow's milk introduction with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Nutrition reviews. 2012; 70: 509-519.
  17. Hedderson MM, Ferrara A, Sacks DA. Gestational diabetes mellitus and lesser degrees of pregnancy hyperglycemia: association with increased risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Obstetrics and Gynecol. 2003; 102: 850-856.
  18. Pallauf J, Muller A. Inorganic feed additives. Biology of Growing Animals. 4: Elsevier. 2006; 179-249.
  19. Mishu FA, Baral N, Afreen KN. Serum zinc and magnesium levels in gestational diabetes mellitus in a tertiary care hospital of Bangladesh. Uttara Adhunik Medical College. 2017: 19.
  20. Moghaddam-Banaem L. Maternal serum iron and zinc levels and gestational diabetes. Archives of Medical Laboratory Sci. 2017; 3.
  21. Hamdan H, Elbashir L, Hamdan S, Elhassan E, Adam I. Zinc and selenium levels in women with gestational diabetes mellitus at Medani Hospital. Sudan. J Obstetrics and Gynaecol. 2014; 34: 567-570.
  22. Wibowo N. The level of zinc is increasing, while the serum folat level is decreasing, after multi-micronutrient supplementation in pregnant woman. Indonesian J Obstetrics and Gynecol. 2012.
  23. Tara F, Maamouri G, Rayman MP, Ghayour-Mobarhan M, Sahebkar A, Yazarlu O, et al. Selenium supplementation and the incidence of preeclampsia in pregnant Iranian women: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial. Taiwanese J Obstetrics and Gynecol. 2010; 49: 181-187.
  24. Askari G, Iraj B, Salehi-Abargouei A, Fallah AA, Jafari T. The association between serum selenium and gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J trace elements in medicine Biol. 2015; 29: 195-201.
  25. Bo S, Lezo A, Menato G, Gallo M-L, Bardelli C, Signorile A, et al. Gestational hyperglycemia, zinc, selenium, and antioxidant vitamins. Nutrition. 2005; 21: 186-191.
  26. Bleys J, Navas-Acien A, Guallar E. Serum selenium and diabetes in US adults. Diabetes care. 2007; 30: 829-834.
  27. Liu PJ, Yao A, Ma L, Chen XY, Yu SL, Liu Y, et al. Associations of serum selenium levels in the first trimester of pregnancy with the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus and preterm birth: a Preliminary Cohort Study. Biological trace element Res. 2020.
  28. Arredondo M, Nunez MT. Iron and copper metabolism. Molecular aspects of medic. 2005; 26: 313-327.
  29. Qiu Q, Zhang F, Zhu W, Wu J, Liang M. Copper in diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis and systematic review of plasma and serum studies. Biological trace element Res. 2017; 177: 53-63.