Incidence and Risk Factors Predisposing to Retinopathy of Prematurity and Treatment Outcome: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Deepak M, Poonam S and Mehta AP

Published on: 2020-12-26

Abstract

Purpose: Retinopathy of prematurity is a disorder of developing retina. The survival rate of preterm infants increased due to advance neonatal care, with a consequent increase in retinopathy of prematurity cases. The aim of our study was to access the incidence of ROP and its risk factors and outcome those who needed treatment.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of preterm infant born in tertiary intensive care unit, was conducted from January 2017 to October 2020. 203 newborns were included based on the following criteria, Gestational age (GA) at birth of ≤35 weeks, birth Weight of ≤2000 gm and babies with GA>35 weeks and BW >2000 if the treating Paediatrician recommended ROP screening due to stormy course in NICU. Data were review to determine the incidence and risk factors of ROP. Neonates were followed up until diseases resolution or until treatment criteria were achieved. 

Results: Two hundred three babies were enrolled for the study. There were 125 (62.1%) males and 77 (37.9%) females. ROP was seen in 41 babies giving an incidence of 20.2%. About half of cases had stage 1 ROP (51.2%) followed by stage 2 (24.4%), APROP (22%) and stage 3 (2.4%). No case of stage 4 and stage 5 ROP were detected. 7 out of 41 ROP cases were type 1 disease with incidence of 3.4%, and received treatment. A significant association was noted between ROP and PDA, sepis, PVL, BPD, RDS, Postnatal steroids, oxygen therapy blood transfusion, TPN (P <0.05). No significant association was found for PIH, Preeclmpsia, GDM, recieveing antenatal steroids, IVH, multiple gestations, SGA, NEC, invasive and noninvasive respiratory support need.

Conclusion: This study found incidence of any stage of ROP was 20.2% and incidence of type 1 disease was 3.4%. A significant association was noted between ROP and PDA, sepsis, PVL, BPD, RDS, Postnatal steroids, oxygen therapy blood transfusion, TPN.

Keywords

Retinopathy of prematurity; Risk factors; Type 1 ROP disease; Incidence

Introduction

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a vasoproliferative disease of developing retina. It ranges from mild disease without any visual loss to advanced disease leading to irreversible blindness [1]. Oxygen supplementation is identified to be an important risk factor for development of ROP [2].  ROP is a multifactorial disease and can develop without supplementation of oxygen so other risk factors are low gestational age (GA), low birth weight(BW), small for gestational age(SGA), intra ventricular hemorrhage(IVH), neonatal sepsis, blood transfusion, patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), respiratory distress syndrome(RDS), mechanical ventilation [3]. The incidence of ROP is varied between different countries. In developed countries, ROP associated blindness incidence has been reported to be <10% of extremely preterm born children but in middle income countries, the incidence is greater than 40% [4].  In India, the incidence of ROP is between 38% and 51.9% in low birth weight babies [5].  Recent studies have shown that the incidence of any stage of ROP among infants weighing <1251 gm was 68%. Although majority of infants who develop ROP have spontaneously regressed, approximately 6% of low birth weight infants (1251 gm) develop severe ROP that requires treatment to prevent visual loss [3]. The aim of this retrospective study to estimate incidence of ROP and to assess the association between ROP and potential risk factors for this condition in neonates in our neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) where a strict protocol of saturation limits has been implemented.

Materials and methods

Setting: This study was conducted in MAX Super specialty Hospital Delhi. As a retrospective observational study involving babies at risk of ROP.  MAX SHBG is NNF accredited and equipped with advanced facilities for neonatal care and resuscitation.

Duration and type of study: This was a retrospective study conducted to assess the incidence of ROP in premature infants and to determine risk factors for its development. Data reviewed from January 2017 to 31st October 2020.

Inclusion criteria: All babies fulfilling the following criteria were included:

  • Gestational age (GA) at birth of ≤35 weeks
  • Birth Weight of ≤2000 gm
  • Babies with GA>35 weeks and BW >2000 if the treating Paediatrician recommended ROP screening due to stormy course in NICU

Exclusion criteria: Those who expires before retinal examinations. Incomplete follow-up.

Procedure

All relevant information including that related to NICU care and risk factors for ROP were duly recorded in a excel sheet. Risk factors that were assessed were as follows: duration of oxygen therapy, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), and sepsis, history of blood transfusion, multiple gestations, and intra ventricular hemorrhage. From the patient's chart, maternal and neonatal comorbid conditions, if any, were noted and recorded. Initial screening of all premature infants was done at 3 or 4 weeks after delivery [7]. Diluted 0.8% tropicamide and 5% phenylephrine eye drops were used to dilate the pupils. Eyes were kept open with the help of eye speculum. A senior retina specialist with experience in ROP examined the babies using indirect ophthalmoscopy and vectis for scleral depression. The findings were recorded in a chart. The international classification of ROP was used to document all retinal examination findings [8]. As per standard schedule for screening, babies were called for further examinations. The highest ROP stage in either eye was recorded.  In the absence of ROP, screening was continued till vascularisation reached zone 3 or completion of 45 weeks post menstrual age, whichever was earlier. Treatment was offered to babies who fulfilled criteteria for treatment.

Data analysis

Statistical analysis was performed, the results are presented in frequencies, percentages and mean ± SD. The Chi-square test was used to compare the categorical variables. The Unpaired t-test was used to compare continuous variables. The p-value<0.05 was considered significant. All the analysis was carried out on SPSS 16.0 version (Chicago, Inc., USA).

Results

Two hundred three babies were enrolled for the study, on the basis the inclusion criteria detailed above. There were 125 (62.1%) males and 77 (37.9%) females.  In other characteristics multi parity was among more than half of cases (52.7%), AGA was among majority of cases (88.7%), Singleton birth was in more than half of cases (64%), and LSCS mode of delivery was among majority of cases (83.3%). ROP was seen in 41 babies giving an incidence of 20.2%. About half of cases had stage 1 ROP (51.2%) followed by stage 2 (24.4%), APROP (22%) and stage 3 (2.4%). No case of stage 4 and stage 5 ROP were detected. Out of 41 ROP cases only 7 cases were fall in to type 1 disease and received treatment. So incidence of severe ROP was 3.4%. More than one third of cases had gestational age 32-34 weeks (45.3%) followed by 30-31 (32%), 28-29 (10.8%), ≥35 (6.9%) and <28 (4.9%) weeks (Table 1). ROP was highest in gestational age <28 weeks (80%) and was nil in ≥35 weeks. There was significant association of incidence of ROP with gestational age (Table 2). The incidence of ROP was inversely related to gestational age.

Table 1: Distribution of incidence of ROP.

Incidence of ROP

No.

%

(n=203)

With ROP

41

20.2

Without ROP

162

79.8

Table 2:  Distribution of gestational age and its association with incidence of ROP.

Gestational age in weeks

No. of patients

With ROP

Without ROP

p-value1

(n=203)

 

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

<28

10

4.9

8

80

2

20

0.0001*

28-29

22

10.8

8

36.4

14

63.6

30-31

65

32

17

26.2

48

73.8

32-34

92

45.3

8

8.7

84

91.3

≥35

14

6.9

0

0

14

100

(Table 3) shows the distribution of birth weight of baby and its association with incidence of ROP. The incidence of ROP was highest among baby with birth weight 1.01-1.25 kgs (47.1%) was lowest with birth weight >2kgs (2.9%).

Table3: Distribution of birth weight of baby and its association with incidence of ROP.

birth weight of baby in kgs

No. of patients

With ROP

Without ROP

p-value1

(n=203)

 

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

<1

10

4.9

4

40

6

60

0.0001*

1.01-1.25

34

16.7

16

47.1

18

52.9

1.26-1.50

37

18.2

6

16.2

31

83.8

1.51-1.75

46

22.7

8

17.4

38

82.6

1.76-2.0

41

20.2

6

14.6

35

85.4

>2

35

17.2

1

2.9

34

97.1

(Table 4) shows the association between ROP and other risk factors. A significant association was noted between ROP and PDA, sepis, PVL, BPD, RDS, Postnatal steroids, oxygen therapy blood transfusion as well as TPN. No significant association was noted between occurrence of ROP and maternal risk factors including PIH, Preeclmpsia, GDM, recieveing antenatal steroids and neonatal risk factors like IVH, multiple gestations, SGA, NEC invasive and noninvasive respiratory support need.

Table 4: Distribution of Maternal and neonatal parameters and its association with incidence of ROP.

 

No. of patients

With ROP

Without ROP

p-value1

(n=203)

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

Maternal parameters

Antenatal steroids

165

81.3

34

20.6

131

79.4

0.76

PIH

46

22.7

11

23.9

35

76.1

0.47

Preeclapsia

11

5.4

2

18.2

9

81.8

0.86

GDM

30

14.8

5

16.7

25

83.3

0.6

LSCS

169

83.3

31

18.3

138

81.7

0.14

Primigravida

96

47.3

22

22.9

74

77.1

0.36

Neonatal parameters

Male

126

62.1

32

25.4

94

74.6

0.01

Twins

67

33

9

13.4

58

86.6

0.08

Triplets

6

3

0

0

6

100

SGA

23

11.3

5

21.7

18

78.3

0.84

IVH

9

4.4

37

44.4

157

55.6

0.06

PDA

26

12.8

11

42.3

15

57.7

0.003*

Sepsis

64

31.5

20

31.2

44

68.8

0.008*

PVL

14

6.9

6

42.9

8

57.1

0.03*

BPD

13

6.4

11

84.6

2

15.4

0.0001*

NEC

4

2

0

0

4

100

0.31

Postnatal steroids

8

3.9

7

87.5

1

12.5

0.0001*

RDS

155

76.4

37

23.9

118

76.1

0.01*

Ventilator required

52

25.6

15

28.8

37

71.2

0.07

CPAP required

168

82.8

36

21.4

132

78.6

0.33

Required oxygen

78

38.4

27

34.6

51

65.4

0.0001*

Blood treatment

19

9.4

11

57.9

8

42.1

0.0001*

 TPN required

68

33.5

26

38.2

42

61.8

0.0001*

 TT required

8

3.9

8

100

0

0

0.0001*

Discussion

ROP is preventable cause of blindness which affects retina. Prematurity is root cause of developing ROP. So screening of ROP is very important to prevent poor vision. There are several risk factors for the development of ROP. But gestational age and birth weight are considered the most important risk factor for the disease. Various studies showed incidence of any stage ROP is between 20% to 52% [6-11]. In our study the overall incidence of any stage ROP was 20.2 % and incidence of same was 80 % and 50.7% in the babies born <28 week and < 32 week respectively. So this is highlighting the fact that prematurity is directly related to the occurrence of ROP. Similar kind of findings found with all published data in literature and also showed known association of low getational age and low birth weight [12-18]. In our study stage 1 ROP is most commonly (51.2 %) found among all ROP cases and all were regressed spontaneously. No case of stage 4 and stage 5 ROP was seen. As all cases were screened in timely manner and we also followed strict optimal saturation policy in our NICU. In our study 22% cases were diagnosed as APROP out of all ROP cases. Out of that seven patients fall in to type 1 ROP disease category and all were received laser treatment and rest two APROP cases spontaneously resolved without treatment. Presence of pulmonary disease in form of RDS, BPD were important risk factor for the development of ROP [19,20]. Need of oxygen, invasive ventilation, noninvasive ventilation were marker of severity of pulmonary disease. Our study showed RDS, BPD and oxygen therapy as a potential risk factor for development of ROP.  Although our study did not find significance in terms of mechanical ventilator and noninvasive respiratory support. Previous studies were showed association of ROP with RDS and oxygen therapy [21-28]. Shohat [29] Seiberth and Linderkamp [30] and Maheshwari [31] showed association of ROP with blood transfusion. Our study showed 58% babies develop ROP those who received blood transfusion which was clinically significant.  PDA & TPN were not the direct cause of ROP but they express the severity of condition of baby. Our study showed significant association with above 2 parameters. Maheshwari [31] and hakeen [32] studies were suggestive of that sepsis in the postnatal period is an important risk factor for developing ROP. Similar association was found in our study.  Similarly literature was suggestive of that NEC is also described as a risk factor for ROP but our study did not found association for NEC [12,32,33]. Materanal growth factors such as pre-eclmpsia GDM, PIH were also found to be responsible for development of ROP [22,27,29,30,32,33]. In our study no such association was found.  We found that incidence of ROP among multiple gestation was not statistically significant. Cryotherapy for ROP study showed the likelihood of developing threshold ROP disease to be 36% greater in multiple gestation birth [34]. A larger sample size needed to confirm this hypothesis. There is no direct relationship between antenatal steroids and ROP but antenatal steroid prevent respiratory distress syndrome and IVH. These are two important risk factors for ROP. Many studies also suggest that antenatal steroid decreases severity of ROP and decrease incidence of ROP also [35]. But our study did not found such association. The limitation of present study include its retrospective nature limiting the control over quality of measurement. Another limitation is small sample size including only three year data. Advantage of our study is that the data belongs to both high income subset of population as well as lower social class of population because as a private hospital we serve both class of community.

Conclusion

The present study reflects the incidence of any stage ROP was 20.2 %. Prematurity, Birth Weight, PDA, sepsis, PVL, BPD, RDS, Postnatal steroids, oxygen therapy, blood transfusion, TPN were found to be independent risk factors in the development of ROP in neonates. Because of advancements in neonatal intensive care in developing countries and higher survival rate of premature infants, the incidence of ROP has increased. Unrecognized and untreated ROP will cause potential blindness in children. Hence, to prevent the adverse visual outcome and possible blindness; timely screening, recognition, and treatment of ROP is essential.

References

  1. Raj R, Latha NV, Asha AV, George TA, Jacob S, Praveena KK. A comparative study of the incidence of retinopathy of prematurity between small-for-gestational-age and appropriate-for-gestational-age preterm babies in North Kerala. Kerala J Ophthalmol. 2017; 29: 197-202.
  2. Alajbegovic?Halimic J, Zvizdic D, Alimanovic?Halilovic E, Dodik I, Duvnjak S. Risk factors for retinopathy of prematurity in premature born children. Med Arch. 2015; 69: 409-413.
  3. Mitsiakos G, Papageorgiou A. “Incidence and factors predisposing to retinopathy of prematurity in inborn infants less than 32 weeks of gestation”. Hippokratia. 2016; 20: 121-126.
  4. Cevher S, Sukgen EA. “The Prevalence of Retinopathy of Prematurity and Relationship with Gestational Age and Birth-Weight; Contributing to Screening Programmes”. EC Ophthalmol. 2019; 10: 94-99.
  5. Anudeep K, Srikanth K, Sindal MD, Jha KN. Study of incidence, risk factors, and treatment outcomes in retinopathy of prematurity in a tertiary care center. TNOA J Ophthalmic Sci Res. 2019; 57: 24-26.
  6. Clark DI, Obrien CO, Weindling AM, Saeed M. Initial experience of screening for retinopathy of prematurity. Arch Dis Child. 1992; 67: 1233-1239.
  7. Paranjpe DG, Sarwate DR, Shetty DN. Risk factor and outcome of retinopathy of prematurity among premature babies admitted to tertiary care hospital: A Retrospective Observational Study. J Current Med Res and Opinion. 2019; 2: 334-338.  
  8. Gole GA, Ells CA, Katz X, Holmstrom G, Fielder AR, Capone A, et al. International committee for the classification of retinopathy of prematurity. The international classification of retinopathy of prematurity revisited. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005; 123: 991-1000.
  9. Katz X, Kychenthal A, Dorta P. Zone I retinopathy of prematurity. J AAPOS. 2000; 4: 373-379.
  10. Palmer EA. Results of US randomized clinical trial of cryotherapy for ROP (CRYO-ROP). Doc Ophthalmol. 1990; 74: 245-251.
  11. Varughese S, Jain S, Gupta N, Singh S, Tyagi V, Puliyel JM. Magnitude of the problem of retinopathy of prematurity. Experience in a large maternity unit with a medium size level-3 nursery. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2001; 49: 187-188.
  12. Hwang JH, Lee EH, Kim EA. Retinopathy of prematurity among very-low-birth-weight infants in Korea: Incidence, Treatment, and Risk Factors. J Korean Med Sci. 2015; 30: S88-S94. 3.
  13. Gunn DJ, Cartwright DW, Gole GA. Incidence of retinopathy of prematurity in extremely premature infants over an 18-year period. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012; 40: 93-99.
  14. Cerman E, Balci SY, Yenice OS, Kazokoglu H, Celiker H, Eraslan M. Screening for retinopathy of prematurity in a tertiary ophthalmology department in Turkey: incidence, outcomes, and risk factors. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2014; 45: 550-555.
  15. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF, Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Walsh MC, et al. Eunice kennedy shriver national institute of child health and human development neonatal research network. Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatr. 2010; 126: 443-456.
  16. Xu Y, Zhou X, Zhang Q, Ji X, Zhang Q, Zhu J, et al. Screening for retinopathy of prematurity in China: A neonatal units-based prospective study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54: 8229-8236.
  17. Austeng D, Kallen K, Hellstrom A, Jakobsson P, Lundgren P, Tornqvist K, et al. Regional differences in screening for retinopathy of prematurity in infants born before 27 weeks of gestation in Sweden-The EXPRESS study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014; 92: 311-315.
  18. Isaza G, Arora S. Incidence and severity of retinopathy of prematurity in extremely premature infants. Can J Opthalmol. 2012; 47: 296-300.
  19. AM Freitas, Morschbacher R, Thorell MR, Rhoden EL. “Incidence and risk factors for retinopathy of prematurity: a retrospective cohort study.” Int J retina and vitreous. 2018; 4.
  20. Saugstad OD, Aune D. Optimal oxygenation of extremely low birth weight infants: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the oxygen saturation target studies. Neonatol. 2014; 105: 55-63.
  21. Shah VA, Yeo CL, Ling YL, Ho LY. Incidence, risk factors of retinopathy of prematurity among very low birth weight infants in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2005; 34: 169-178.
  22. Maini B, Chellani H, Arya S, Guliani BP. Retinopathy of prematurity: Risk factors and role of antenatal betamethasone in Indian preterm newborn babies. J Clin Neonatol. 2014; 3: 20-24.
  23. Lucey JF, Dangman B. A reexamination of the role of oxygen in retrolental fibroplasia. Pediatr. 1984; 73: 82-96.
  24. Madan A, Penn JS. Animal models of oxygen-induced retinopathy. Front Biosci. 2003; 8: 1030-1043.
  25. Penn JS, Tolman BL, Lowery LA. Variable oxygen exposure causes preretinal neovascularization in the newborn rat. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993; 34: 576-585.
  26. Procianoy RS, Garcia-Prats JA, Adams JM, Silvers A, Rudolph AJ. Hyaline membrane disease and intraventricular haemorrhage in small for gestational age infants. Arch Dis Child. 1980; 55: 502-505.
  27. Chaudhari S, Patwardhan V, Vaidya U, Kadam S, Kamat A. Retinopathy of prematurity in a tertiary care center – Incidence, risk factors and outcome. Indian Pediatr. 2009; 46: 219-224.
  28. Chan-Ling T, Gock B, Stone J. The effect of oxygen on vasoformative cell division. Evidence that physiological hypoxia is the stimulus for normal retinal vasculogenesis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995; 36: 1201-1214.
  29. Shohat M, Reisner SH, Krikler R, Nissenkorn I, Yassur Y, Ben-Sira I. Retinopathy of prematurity: Incidence and risk factors. Pediatr. 1983; 72: 159-163.
  30. Seiberth V, Linderkamp O. Risk factors in retinopathy of prematurity. A multivariate statistical analysis. Ophthalmologica. 2000; 214: 131-135.
  31. Maheshwari R, Kumar H, Paul VK, Singh M, Deorari AK, Tiwari HK. Incidence and risk factors of retinopathy of prematurity in a tertiary care newborn unit in New Delhi. Natl Med J India. 1996; 9: 211-214.
  32. Hakeem AH, Mohamed GB, Othman MF. Retinopathy of prematurity: A study of prevalence and risk factors. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2012; 19: 289-294.
  33. Kim TI, Sohn J, Pi SY, Yoon YH. Postnatal risk factors of retinopathy of prematurity. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2004; 18: 130-134.
  34. Palmer EA, Flynn JT, HardyRJ, Phelps DL, Phillips CL, Schaffer DB. Incidence and early course of retinopathy of prematurity. The cryotherapy for retinopathy of prematurity cooperative group. Ophthalmol. 1991; 98: 1628-1640.
  35. Higgins RD, Mendelsohn AL, DeFeo MJ, Ucsel R, Hendricks?Munoz KD, et al. Antenatal dexamethasone and decreased severity of retinopathy of prematurity. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998; 116: 601-605.