Influence of Chemical Treatments on The Properties of Acai and Curaua Fibers

Gehlen L, Flores-Sahagun THS, Pezzin APT and Satyanarayana KG

Published on: 2024-07-24

Abstract

Brazil has a large capacity in the production of lignocellulosic fibers, due to its abundant biomass and for having one of the largest cultivable territorial extensions. Of these, native acai fibers and curaua are considered in this study for the preparation and characterization of polymeric composites. For this purpose, hydrophilic character of these fibers, which is common with lignocellulosic fibers, that interferes normally in the compatibility with polymeric matrices has been overcome by giving surface treatments using chemicals to modify the structure of the fibers. With this, their application capability is expected to enhance. Recognizing that very limited published report on the effect of chemical treatments of acai fibers and no published report on treatments of both the fibers by sodium borohydride (NaBH4), this paper is aimed at evaluating chemical and thermal properties both these fibers after their treatment by NaBH4 and sodium hydroxide with different compositions with a view to understand the influence of these treatments on the structure, chemical composition and thermal stability of the fibers for their possible use in polymer based composites. Obtained results of both the fibers revealed that these chemical treatments increased contents of cellulose, but decreased the hemicellulose of both fibers, while spectroscopic studies by Fourier transform infrared showed that wide hydroxyl bands were not affected by chemical treatments. Both fibers exhibited better thermal stability after alkaline treatment. These results clearly underlined that chemical treatments were effective in improving their thermal properties.

Keywords

Lignocellulosic fibers; Acai; Curaua; Alkaline treatment; Characterization

Introduction

Brazil has an abundant variety of lignocellulosic fibers due to its abundant biomass and large cultivable territorial extensions [1-7]. It is important to study less common natural fibers to increase their applications [8-15]. Two such fibers, native acai fibers and curaua may be used for polymer based composite materials but also, for other uses. However, vegetable fibers have a hydrophilic character which normally interferes in compatibility with polymer matrices. Composites. This has been overcome by giving surface treatments particularly using chemicals to modify the structure of the fibers whereby enhancing their application capability. While there is very limited published report on the effect of chemical treatments of acai fibers, no report is available of sodium hydroborate (NaBH4) treatment of both these fibers. This paper presents effect of alkaline treatments with and without sodium borohydride on acai and curaua fibers for possible use in polymer based composites, nanocellulose production and other applications. It was concluded that the alkaline treatment improved thermal stability of both fibers, what is beneficial during the processing stage of composites through extrusion or injection molding.

During the last few decades’ research related to the plant fibers has been driven steadfast due to increasing concern over the environment, depletion of fossil fuels, and climate change [16]. This is exemplified by the fact that increasing wide range of applications, including in engineering sector, of some plant fiber composites have been reported in recent times particularly in North America, Europe, China and Japan [17]. The purpose behind this is to replace the expensive and non-biodegradable synthetic fibers such as glass and aramid fibers in the development of composites with polymer, ceramic and cement based composites [18-24]. This is justified in view of these plant fibers being esthetically interesting and biodegradable besides their exhibiting good thermal insulation and comparable specific strength properties with synthetic fibers. In addition, they are of low cost, durable, sustainable and of renewable sources, which can be used in several segments of the industry and hence they provide an interesting research area and thus considerable efforts are being made to tap their full potential [16,22-30]. Additional attractions for their use in composite industry are their less abrasiveness than that of synthetic fibers and therefore causing low wear and tear to the conventional processing equipment while preparing their polymeric based composites [30,31]. With these unique characteristics, plant fibers offer economical, functional, and environmental advantages.

There have been many studies reported on various fibers of Brazilian origin and their composites, which have been reviewed from time to time [27,32- 33]. Of these, fibers from acai (Euterpe oleracea) palm of genus Euterpe and curaua (Pineapple erectofolius) have been chosen for this study. Figure 1 shows photographs of these plants and their fibers.

Figure 1(a-c): (a)- Euterpe edulis (from Mata Atlântica province, Southern Brazil) palm tree of genus Euterpe; (b)- Acai mesocarp covered by fibers and (c) Red and White curaua plants [34-37].

Acai palm (Figure 1a) is a species of palm tree belonging to Euterpe genre, which is native to Brazil, northern part of South America and Trinidad and mainly cultivated for its fruits and hearts of palm [34]. Acai fibers are obtained from the fruit of the palm trees, which is mostly grown in the Amazonian area and in the Mata Atlântica. It may be noted that there are different Euterpe species grown in these regions. Acai is abundantly produced in the north region of Brazil, especially in the city of Belem, in ParA state, where a large amounts of residues (90%) are generated [38-40]. The acai fibers are present in the cover of the mesocarp as well as in the pulp of the fruit (Figure 1b), which are extracted from these manually.

It is reported by that the thermal behavior presented by the fibers of the mesocarp of the acai is similar to that exhibited by other natural fibers such as coir, sisal, etc., which are already used industrially, particularly in automobile industry [41]. There is no much published work on various properties of these fibers except for a very old report on the morphological properties of the Euterpe edulis seed (from which the fiber is removed) [42].

Although these fibers have been used in handicrafts, papermaking, fertilizer production, oxidant extraction, enzymatic substrate and energy generation, their use in the development of polymer based composites are rarely found in the literature except for one with rubber matrix [39]. However, agro-industrial production of these fibers has a predominant role in the extraction of acai, in view of use of the processed pulp of the fruit for food in several Brazilian states and abroad [34]. Thus, there exist good perspectives for the use of acai fibers in the development of new materials [43-45].

The other fiber taken for this study is the curaua (Ananas erectofolius) fiber from white variety, while there is purple variety also. The fiber used in this study is obtained from the leaves (1.5m long and 4cm wide) of plant (Figure 1c) belonging to the same family of the pineapple and is another plant cultivated in the Amazonian area, in the proximities of Santarem and Belem of ParA [25,46-47].

The curaua fiber is extracted from the sheet using a device called "periquita", or by machine similar to the one used to extract the sisal fiber, with production of about 20-25 kg of fiber per day [22,23,46,48-50]. Morphology and properties of this have been studied by many researchers [22,32,51-53]. According to these studies, this fiber is of light weight and exhibits superior mechanical resistance amongst all the plant-based fibers which is of comparable to those of glass fibers. With these characteristics, the fiber has many applications in industrial sector particularly as reinforcement to develop composites [23,32,52]. Among the benefits of the cultivation of the curaua, it is reported that besides the easy processing of fibers and the possibility to have in consortium with other plantations in reforestation areas, this plant is also provider of an important source of income and jobs in most of needy regions of the country thus providing an opportunity for families and small farmers [25,54-56]. Thus, this fiber is an attractive material both economically and technologically and with attractive characteristics particularly with its adhesion with a polymeric matrix due to the mechanical anchorage, allows its use for the manufacture of composite materials for various industrial applications [47,57-60].

With the above background, studies have been made by the authors to utilize both these fibers in the development of polymer based composites. Of course, composites with plant fibers cannot reach the same strength level as the glass fiber composites in view of their hydrophilic nature, susceptible to degradation, attack by microorganisms, low chemical resistance, etc., leading to incompatibility with the generally hydrophobic polymer matrices, besides their lower thermal resistance and a loss of mechanical properties due to moisture uptake [61,62]. This calls for effecting structural modification of their surface through various methods such as chemical treatments or grafting, and physicochemical treatments [63-65] to achieve superior mechanical performance by the plant fiber based polymer composites. This can be achieved by the optimization of interfacial bonding between the plant fibers and used polymer because the major role is played by the interface through transfer of applied stress and distribution of bonding, which are continued to be understood yet completely [17]. Although there are many publications and reviews dealing with the above aspects, the latest overview is reported recently [17] wherein various factors are presented along with critical suggestions and perspectives. These include: (i) Compatibility between the heterogeneous constituents of these composites, (ii) Different modification approaches to refine the interfacial adhesion with view to overcome the incompatibility between the constituents of these composites, (iii) Mechanisms underlying the interfacial bonding, and finally (iv) the assessment of interface structure and bonding.

Such modifications would result in improvement of interfacial adhesion between the fibers and polymers used leading to increased mechanical properties, bio-durability, and weatherability of the corresponding surface [63,65]. A number of methods of surface modifications (acetylation, mercerization, silanization, coupling agents, etc.,) have been used by various researchers [66-82], which are reviewed from time to time [17,22-24,63,64,83,84]. Of these, one of the most economical, besides modifying the morphology, dimensions and mechanical properties of plant fibers, is reported to be alkaline treatment, also called ‘mercerization’ method [61,66,70]. This also [62,66,85,86] significantly removes the amount of lignin and hemicelluloses that cover the fiber due to the high solubility of hemicelluloses in alkalis. The latter is reported to lead to low rigidity and low dense of interfibrillar regions both resulting in reorganization of cellulose microfibrils at the site of deformation. This reorganization of the microfibrils results in a better distribution of stresses during stretching of the lignocellulosic fibers, giving the fibers better tensile strength. The latter also removes any impurity on the surface of the plant fibers while reducing the microcracks, if any, making the fiber surface to be more uniform and rough, whereby the adhesion between the fiber and the matrix enhanced [85,87].

However, the alkaline treatment is highly aggressive that can decrease the mechanical and thermal properties of the fibers [61,85]. To overcome this, an alternative and less used method has been proposed wherein the sodium borohydrate would act as protecting agent of the fibers [88,89]. This patented process has used (1 % m/v) borohydride ion as a protective agent for sisal fibers treated with different percentages of NaOH for using the fibers in an unsaturated polyester resin [88,89].

 The best results of chemical composition, adhesion, tensile strength, thermal stability and morphology were reported with 5% NaOH. Another study has reported effect of use of sodium borohydride, commonly used as a reducing agent for the reduction of carbonyls, since it is effective under mild and aqueous conditions, which does not occur in the use of other reducing agents such as lithium aluminum hydride [90]. Effect of sodium borohydride on plant fibers through the reduction mechanism of sodium borohydride is well documented [91-93]. It is also reported that the use of borohydride ion as a reducing agent in vegetable fibers has the purpose of reducing or preventing the degradation of the monosaccharide units present in the cellulosic chain by reducing the aldehyde terminal group present in the C-1 of the polysaccharide. These monomeric units provide the fibers with structural stability and are affected by the pH conditions of the alkaline treatment, which significantly reduces the degree of polymerization of the cellulose [88,94].

Based on the above literature survey and background, a study on the effect of use of acai and curaua fibers in the unsaturated polyester resins was taken up as part of Master’s degree dissertation of the first author. The objectives of this study were subjecting both acai and curaua fibers to both alkaline (NaOH) and sodium borohydrate (NaBH4) treatments and evaluate their effects on various properties and morphologies of these two fibers and their composites. This paper, part of the above work, presents the characterization of both the selected fibers with and without surface modifications (by the above mentioned chemicals) in respect of chemical and thermal properties. Report on studies on the preparation of their composites is being prepared separately.

Materials And Methods

Preparation of fibers: First, as received acai fibers of 2 cm long were washed thrice and sieved to get highly pure fibers as they were from industrial wastes and had pulp, seeds and peels of fruit residues. On the other hand, as received curaua fibers (white variety), which were of about 80 cm long and in bundles, were separated and cut into about 2 cm long using scissors to be of same size as of acai fibers. Both the fibers were washed and dried in an air circulated hot air oven maintained at 60 ° C for 24h. Then both the fibers were weighed in an analytical balance. Figure 2 shows these fibers before they are used for further studies.

Figure 2 (a-d): Acai fibers: (a)- As received acai mesocarp covered by fibers; (b)- After drying; Curaua fibers: (c)- As received long fibers; (d) Chopped fibers.

Chemical Treatment of The Fibers

The fibers were subjected to two types of chemical treatment; first fibers were given alkali treatment using 5% NaOH and then some of the alkali treated fibers were subjected to 1% NaBH4 treatment. The alkali treatment was carried out by preparing of a solution containing 5% of NaOH in distilled water using 660 g of NaOH dissolved in 13.2L of water. Then about 100 g of the fibers were immersed in this solution, stirred well and kept for 24 h at room temperature (25 °C). In the case of additional NaBH4 treatment, 132 g of sodium borohydride was added to the previously prepared 5% NaOH solution, and the ratio of alkaline solution / fibers was maintained at 10g/L following an earlier report [88]. They were then washed with water until neutral pH to remove the remaining solution, if any from the fiber to stop any further reaction. The fibers were then dried in a hot air oven maintained at 60 °C for 24h.

Chemical Characterization

Determination of moisture

Moisture content in the fibers was determined following the TAPPI T550 om-03 standard.

Determination of ashes

Ash contents of both the fibers were determined following TAPPI T211 om-02 standard.

Determination of cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin

Amount of cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin present in acai and curaua fibers were determined following the methodology proposed by Silva [95]. 2.2.4. Spectroscopic analysis using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR)

Spectroscopic analysis using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR)

The spectroscopic analysis using total reflectance method was carried out in a Parkin Elmer FTIR spectrometer (Model: Espectrum One B) using attenuated total reflectance (ATR) with crystal attachment. The fibers were pressed on top of a crystal and spectra were obtained with 32 scans for each fiber sample using a resolution of 4 cm-1 in the wave number range of 4000 to 550 cm-1. Three repetitions for each sample were made to check for the reproducibility of the obtained results.

Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

The thermal characterization of both the fibers with and without the alkaline treatments was carried out in TGA testing equipment (Make: TA Instruments No. / 10198/TA; Model: Q50) in the temperature range varying between 25 and 650 ºC, in steps of 10 °C/min in an inert nitrogen atmosphere.

Results And Discussion

Chemical Characterization of The Fibers

Chemical characterization of any lignocellulosic fibers is essential and relevant for finding their uses. In the case of lignocellulosic fibers, it is essential for using them as reinforcements in various natural and synthetic polymeric matrices in view of understanding the interface between the matrix and the filler/reinforcement. This interface indicates chemical compatibility between the polymer matrix and the fiber as an import role in dictating good adhesion and consequently good mechanical properties is dictated by the interface.

Results of chemical characterization of the açai and curauá fibers with and without alkaline treatment (5% NaOH) and (5% NaOH + 1% NaBH4) with the addition of a protecting agent are given in Table 1(a & b) respectively. At the outset, it can be seen from the tables that total constituents of the fibers with or without any chemical treatments would not add up to 100%. In the case of fibers without any treatment, the above can be attributed to the fact that several factors (nature, collection place, age, genetic variety, species, type of soil, growth conditions, etc.) affect the compositionof lignocellulosic fibers [96-102]. In the case of chemically treated fibers, one can expect lower values of constituents, because these are affected by the chemicals used [81].

Table 1(a): Chemical Composition of the acai fibers before and after chemical treatments.

Constituents of Acai fiber (%)

As Received (%)

Treated by 5 % NaOH (%)

Treated by 5 % NaOH + 1 % NaBH4 (%)

Moisture

6.4 ± 0.3

8.5 ± 0.7

7.9 ± 0.2

Ashes

1.9 ± 0.3

4.6 ± 0.1

3.5 ± 0.2

Hemicelluloses

13.9 ± 1.6

10 ± 0.8

9.6 ± 0.7

Lignin

39.1 ± 1.2

30.3 ± 0.9

31.4 ± 0.5

Cellulose

27.5 ± 1.4

29.7 ± 0.9

31.2 ± 0.5

 

83

83.6

88.8

*Average values of components from triplicate determination of each type of sample.

Table 1(b): Chemical Composition of the curaua fibers before and after chemical treatments.

Constituents of curaua fiber (%)

As Received (%)

Treated by 5 % NaOH (%)

Treated by 5 % NaOH + 1 % NaBH4 (%)

Moisture content

5.31 ± 0.2

5.5± 0.9

5.1 ± 0.2

Ashes

0.23 ± 0.03

0.9 ± 0.2

0.61 ± 0.05

Hemicelluloses

20.2 ± 2.1

7.5 ± 3.2

4.1 ± 3.7

Lignin

4.7 ± 0.9

6.8 ± 2.1#

4.2 ± 1.3

Cellulose

62.5 ± 0.6

80.6 ± 1.4

83.2 ± 2.9

 

101.9

93.13

97.21

*Average values of components from triplicate determination of each type of sample;

# This higher value compared to that of the as-received fiber may be experimental error.

From Table 1(a), it can be seen that the cellulose (27.5 ± 1.4), hemicelluloses (13.9 ± 1.6) and lignin (39.1 ± 1.2) contents of the fibers without any treatment were different from the values of these for the acai fibers obtained from Euterpe oleracea palm tree, which showed 37% of hemicelluloses, 33% of lignin and 33% of cellulose [39].

Similarly, in the case of curaua fibers also, observed values of cellulose, hemicelluloses lignin and ash contents were different from the earlier reported values (in %) (70.7-73.6 Cellulose; 7.5-11.1 hemicelluloses; 21.1 lignin; 0.79-0.9 ashes and 2.5-2.8 extracts [32] and (73.6 Cellulose; 9.9 hemicelluloses; 7.5 lignin; 0.9 ashes) [103,104]. It can also be seen that except for the hemicelluloses content, all other constituents of the fiber were lower than those earlier reported values.

The above observations about the differences in constituents of both the fibers in the as-received condition from those reported earlier values can be understood as mentioned earlier as due to dependence of chemical composition on various factors such as the species of the plant, cultivation conditions, etc.

On the other hand, variations in the amount of chemical constituents after the chemical treatments of both the fibers can be seen from the Table 1(a & b). For example, the moisture content of acai fibers without any treatment (6.4± 0.3 %) is lower than that that of NaOH and borohydrate treated fibers (7.9 ± 0.2 %), which in turn is lower than that treated with NaOH treated fibers (8.5 ± 0.7 %). It is well established that NaOH treatment changes both the chemical composition and morphology of lignocellulosic fibers due to the extraction of waxy layer on the surface of these fibers and also of amorphous regions in addition to the partial dissolution of lignin [81]. This may also increase the molecular orientation during the stretching process of the fiber when tested for tensile properties resulting in realignment of the molecular configuration leading to improved strength properties [105]. In fact, it has been also reported that NaOH treatment of lignocellulosic fibers generally improves their tensile strength compared to other chemicals such as methacrylamide [81]. According to Santos et al., [106], the main components of plant fibers are cellulose microfibrils coated with amorphous lignin matrix and hemicelluloses. Due to the hydrophilic character of this amorphous matrix, which does not interfere in the fiber-matrix adhesion properties, the alkaline treatment would act by superficially modifying the fiber and thus altering its morphology [61,66]. Probably, the above observed results in the present study may be attributed to the degradation of the hydrolytic part of the hemicelluloses. However, results obtained in the present study are contrary to the observation of earlier reports, where in breaking free hydroxyls in the amorphous areas of the fibers has been attributed to the reduction in water absorption of the fibers [62].

In the case of curaua fibers, contrary to the report that the chemical constituents of the fibers vary with the species (purple or white), plantation places and period elapsed after the crop [35], no variation was observed in the moisture content in the present study after the chemical treatments made in this study. This is similar to the observation of Silva [107] in Eucalyptus grandis wood fibers after treatment with 1-10 % NaOH.

Similarly, a significant increase in the ash content of both the fibers (acai and curaua fibers) after the chemical treatment can be seen with the highest for the NaOH treatment (4.6% and 0.9%) followed by NaOH + NaBH4 treatment (3.7% and 0.61%) over that of fibers without any treatment (1.9% and 0.23%). This observation is similar to that observed for piacava fibers, which showed 6 % of ash content for the fibers with 10 % NaOH treatment compared to 1.0 % for fibers without the treatment [108]. The ash content observed in as received acai fiber (1.9%) in the present study is similar to the one reported earlier (1.47 %) in the acai fiber from Euterpe oleracea Mart. [109].

In the case of acai fibers, values of hemicelluloses and lignin after the alkali as well as alkali + NaBH4 treatments are lower than those in fibers without treatment. This is understandable as due to removal of some of these parts in the fibers [83,87] although decrease in their values is not expected with NaBH4 treatment because fiber is supposed to be protected by this treatment. On the other hand, values of only hemicelluloses showed decreasing trend in the case of curaua fibers after the chemical treatments with NaOH and NaOH + NaBH4 treatments showing the values of 7.5 % and 4.1% respectively. However, in the case of lignin in these fibers, the value is higher (6.8%) for NaOH treated fibers, while it almost remained the same (4.2%) with NaBH4 treatments as that of fibers without any treatment (4.7%) contrary to previous reports, which reported 5% NaOH as the ideal concentration for the removal of the lignin and hemicelluloses [111,112]. Another report [49] has also mentioned little difference in lignin content of curaua with and without treatment by 5% NaOH showing the values of 8.85 %, and 9.28 % respectively.

Decrease of hemicelluloses on both the chemical treatments can be understood as mentioned in the case of acai fibers in that hemicelluloses get dissolved in the alkaline solutions [66] resulting in the hydrolytic degradation. However, values of lignin remaining the same with NaBH4 treatments although seem intriguing, but may be protection of fibers with this treatment seem to be the cause for this observation.

Value of cellulose shows the highest for both the fibers after treatment with NaOH + NaBH4 followed by treatment with NaOH compared to that of fibers without any treatment; the latter being in agreement with earlier study, which reported higher cellulose content (83.09%) for fibers treated with 5 % NaOH compared to that of fibers without treatment (70.25%) [49]. This is understandable because initial structure of cellulose consists of both crystalline and amorphous structure and on mercerization (treatment with NaOH), hydrogen bonds in the amorphous phase becoming weaker, increasing swelling of cellulose and increasing the crystalline phase as reported earlier [66].

Since NaBH4 gives protection to the fibers, the highest cellulose content in the fibers treated with NaBH4 is understandable. Since the cellulose gives higher resistance, chemically treated fibers can therefore be potential candidates as reinforcements for polymeric matrices in the development of composites as reported elsewhere [113].

Spectroscopic Analysis Using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR)

Figure 3 (a & b) shows FTIR spectra of acai and curaua fibers with and without chemical treatments with 5% NaOH and 5% NaOH + 1% NaBH4. It can be seen from these figures that wide bands in the region of 3350 cm-1 (Fig.3a) and 3330 cm-1 (Figure 3b) are of hydroxyl bands having hydrogen bonds in cellulose [35,41,49,61,62,66,83,87,94,99,108, 112,114,115]. These are not affected by the chemical treatments except for the slight variation in the trough part of these bands in the case of chemical treated fibers over that of fibers without any treatment. These are in agreement with the earlier report [116]. This result can be attributed to total and/or partial removal of the waxes, extractives and hemicelluloses, which increased hydroxyl groups (- OH) of the cellulose.

Figure 3: FTIR spectra of (a) acai fibers and (b) curaua fibers with and without chemical treatments.

Presence of carbonyl (C=O) bands of hemicelluloses is evident from the characteristic bands of hemicelluloses seen at 1736 cm-1 and 1729 cm-1 for the fibers with and without chemical treatments. This is in agreement with the characteristic band of hemicelluloses at 1728 cm-1 [68,117, 118]. The absence of transmittance bands for chemically treated fibers in those areas is attributed to solubility of hemicelluloses at low concentrations of alkali resulting in the hydrolytic degradation promoted by the removal of the same.

Similar behavior occurs in the range of 1649 cm-1 in the case of curaua fibers (Figure 3b) and 1238 cm-1 where it is noticed the decrease of the bands of the group C-O of carboxyl groups and of esters of the hemicelluloses with alkaline treatment [35, 55, 61, 62, 88, 94]. The band at 1315 cm-1 refers to the angular deformation in the present hydroxyl in the aromatic ring of the lignin [116], concomitant with the band at 1319 cm-1 found in both fibers. The spectra showed high peaks in the area of 1030 cm-1 attributed to the stretching of the connections C-O-C bonds found in the hemicelluloses, lignin and cellulose structures [119].

Thermo-Gravimetric Analysis (TGA)

Thermal degradation of these fibers is one of the crucial aspects in the development of lignocellulosic fiber incorporated polymer composites, which would certainly pose limitation for the use of some thermoplastics. Thermo-gravimetric analysis would throw light on this aspect.

Figure 4 (a & b) present thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA) and their derivative (DTG) curves for acai and curaua fibers with and without chemical treatments (5 % of NaOH and 5 % of NaOH + 1 % of NaBH4) respectively. Table 2 shows degradation temperatures and weight loss of various constituents of the fibers that have been derived from the above figures besides information about the thermal stability of these two fibers with and without chemical treatments.

Figure 4: Thermo-gravimetric curves of fibers with and without chemical treatments: (a) acai; fibers (b) curaua fibers.

It can be mentioned that the curves shown in Figure 4 (a & b) are similar to those reported by various researchers for various lignocellulosic fibers from Brazil and other places. From these, degradation temperatures of various constituents of the fibers have been arrived at. For example, it can be seen from Figure 4 (a) that all the fibers (with and without treatments) show a three-stage process in the thermal degradation. In the case of fibers without any treatment, first stage of about 8% weight loss observed at 100 oC can be attributed to evaporation of moisture, which clearly underlines the high moisture content in these fibers observed in chemical composition and FTIR spectra earlier.

After the removal of moisture, a mass loss of about 30% observed with the onset of the with a small peak in DTG curve. This is attributed to breaking of cellulose bonds and beginning of degradation of hemicelluloses as has been attributed by various researchers working with lignocellulosic fibers to the low molecular weight components [39]. The next mass loss of 31% observed with the onset of degradation at 338 oC, and the maximum at 351 oC can be attributed to decomposition of cellulose, which can be seen with large peak in DTG curve. The third stage starting from 370 ºC showing the mass variation is due to the final decomposition of the cellulose and the lignin, with final amount of residues of 18% [49].

Table 2: Mass Loss (%) and degradation temperature (°C) of the acai fibers.

Fiber

1° Stage

 

2° Stage

 

3° Stage

 

Acai

Mass Loss (%)

Tonset2 (°C)

Mass Loss (%)

Tonset3 (°C)

Mass Loss (%)

Residue (%)

As-Received

8.4

257

30

338

31

5.4

5% NaOH Treated

8.6

273

47.3

 -

 -

33.9

5% NaOH + 1% NaBH4 Treated

8.2

273

44.9

 -

 -

35

The percentage of residue was 5.4% very close to the amount of residue reported earlier (4.8%) for acai fibers from Euterpe oleracea [120]. Finally, about 26% weight loss observed at maximum of the next onset temperature of 575 oC can be attributed to degradation of lignin. In fact, second and third stage of degradation associated with the cellulose and breaking down of lignin has been attributed by many researchers working with lignocellulosic fibers . All these onset temperatures and mass losses at various temperature ranges are listed in Table 2.

Now, coming to the chemically treated (with 5 % of NaOH and 5% of NaOH + NaBH4) fibers, only two decomposition stages are observed as can be seen from Figure 4(a). The first stage related to about 8.6 % and 8.2% weight losses occurring at almost the same decomposition temperatures of 100°C. These are due to loss of moisture suggesting enhancement of degradation temperature of the acai fiber. The second stage observed at Tonset temperatures of 273 oC for the two treatments, degradation temperatures were found to be about 16 oC over that of fibers without any treatment. This suggests higher thermal stability of these chemically treated fibers due to higher cellulose content of these fibers (about 44%), which is evident by the chemical composition of treated fibers mentioned earlier, resulted by the removal of practically complete hemicelluloses component and fraction of low weight molar lignin, confirming the observed results of FTIR.

These stages extended up to 312 ° C(Tmax2) and 315 ° C(Tmax2) in the fibers with 5% NaOH and additional NaBH4 treatments showing mass losses of 47.3% and 44.9% respectively. The latter may be due to the protective action of borohydride and related to the final decomposition of cellulose due to the absence of the third stage, the removal of lignin and hemicelluloses in the treated fibers. The high percentage of residues observed in the treated acai fibers can be justified by the presence of traces of inorganic matter that was retained in the process of pulping and cannot be completely removed in the pretreatment of the fibers.

The next stage of decomposition is of the lignin component of the fibers, which showed mass loss of 13.5 % and 12.8 % respectively for fibers treated with 5% NaOH and 5% + NaBH4 respectively. In addition, decomposition temperature was found to decrease by about 100 oC by the chemical treatment of the fibers with maximum decomposition temperature of 475 oC compared to that of fibers without any treatment.

Table 3: Mass Loss (%) and degradation temperature (°C) of the acai curaua fibers.

Fiber

1° Stage

 

2° Stage

 

 

Curaua

Mass Loss (%)

Tonset2 (°C)

Mass Loss (%)

TmAx2 (°C)

Residue (%)

As-Received

5.9

290

65.8

328

7.4

5% NaOH Treated

7.5

326

72.2

355

2.2

5% NaOH + 1% NaBH4 Treated

6.4

336

75.8

360

1.6

With the chemical treatment, ash content of the treated fibers seems to be highest (6.5 times) for NaOH treatment followed by NaOH + NaBH4 treatment (1.1 % less than only NaOH treated ones) compared to that of fibers without any treatment. These results thus suggest the fibers develop thermal resistance due to the chemical treatments used in this study (independent of presence of NaBH4), which represent the auto extinguishing characteristics, probably due to the presence of high aromaticity of lignin [121]. It may also be inferred that use of NaBH4 did not show any significant influence on the protection of the fiber as it was expected [88] while the degradation of the hemicelluloses (weaker component of lignocellulosics) by NaOH solution is greater than that of cellulose and lignin, which enhances the thermal stability of the fibers.

On the other hand, curaua fibers without any treatment showed two degradation stages (Fig. 4b), the first one around 80 °C showing mass loss of 5.9 % related to evaporation of moisture. Then, there is onset of second stage around 290 °C due to the degradation of the lignocellulosic components (lignin and hemicelluloses) with a mass loss of 65.8 % and finally, when the cellulose was degraded 7.4% of ashes was observed [25,71].

However, chemically treated curaua fibers showed similar behavior as observed in the case of acai fibers with significant increase in the degradation temperature (Tonset2) corresponding to 36°C for the NaOH treated fibers and 46 °C for the NaOH + NaBH4

Also, increase of the mass losses of 72.2 and 75.8% were also observed for NaOH and NaOH + NaBH4 treated fibers, respectively, identifying the increment in the percentage of cellulose of the treated fibers and decrease in the thermal properties due to the treatments. The onset temperatures (Tonset2) 326 and 336 °C and TmAx2 of 355 and 360 °C in the fibers treated with 5% NaOH and 5% NaOH + NaBH4 treatments respectively, suggested possible protection by NaBH4, which confirmed that the borohydrate reduced the aggressiveness of the alkaline treatment to the fibers increasing the fibers resistance to high temperatures [88].

Conclusions

  • Cellulose content of the lignocellulosic fibers increased with the alkaline treatment.
  • Chemical treatments with 5 % NaOH and 5 % NaOH + 1% NaBH4 were effective in the reduction of amorphous phase (hemicelluloses) while increasing the crystalline phase (Cellulose) of both acai and curaua fibers.
  • The above results were corroborated by the FTIR studies of these fibers wherein spectral bands related to hemicelluloses disappeared on chemical treatments of these fibers.
  • Thermal studies revealed enhancement of degradation temperatures of both the fibers on chemical treatments used in this study thus underlining the improved thermal stability in the fibers.
  • Obtained results clearly suggest the reinforcement potential of both the fibers is greater in relation to the untreated fibers whereby possibility of obtaining better strength and thermal properties of polymer composites can be expected when these two fibers with chemical treatments are used as reinforcements.

Funding: The first author (Larissa R. Gehlen) received fellowship from CNPq during her Master degree during which time this study was undertaken with Process N° 133777/2012-2. Similarly, Prof. Thais has received funding from National Council for Scientific and Technological Research (CNPq, Process No.302459/2023-5.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ruth Santana, Elisane Koller, Suelen Souza and Claudio Nunes Jr for their help in the laboratory or discussion . They also thank the Univille (Universidade da Regiao de Joinville, Santa Catarina, Rua Paulo Malschitzk, 10 - Zona Industrial Norte, Joinville - SC, 89219-710, Brazil) for permitting to use the facilities during the course of this study, Center of Support to Projects of Community Action in Belem - PA (CEAPAC) and Alicon Agroindustrial Company Garuva-SC for the supply of curaua and acai fibers used in the present study. One of the authors (Dr. KGS) would like to express sincere thanks to Poornaprajna Institute for Scientific Research (PPISR), Bengaluru, with whom he has been associated, for their encouragement.

Conflicts of Interest

On behalf of all the authors, it is declared that there are no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations through the following: employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding, which would inappropriately influence this study.

References

  1. Berlim LS, Bezerra AG, Pazin WM, Ramin TS, Schreiner WH, Ito AS. Photophysical properties of flavonoids extracted from syngonanthus nitens, the Golden Grass. J Luminescence. 2018; 194: 394-400.
  2. Santos NS, Silva MR, Alves JL. Reinforcement of a biopolymer matrix by lignocellulosic Agro-Waste. procedia engineering. 2017; 200: 422-427.
  3. Satyanarayana KG, Thais HSFS, Bowman. Chapter in Book: Lignocellulosic Composite Materials. Ed. Susheel Kalia; Springer Series on Polymer and Composite Materials; Springer: Dehradun, India. 2017; 177-214.
  4. Coelho de Carvalho LM, Dal Toe Casagrande M. Mechanical Behaviour of Reinforced Sand with Natural CurauA Fibers through Full Scale Direct Shear Tests. E3S Web Conf. 2019; 92: 12003.
  5. Monteiro de Lima A, Del Pino GG, Rivera JLV, Chong KB, Bezazi A, Macedo Neto JCD, Valenzuela MDLGDS, Dehaini J, Diaz FV. Characterization of Polyester Resin Nanocomposite with Curaua Fibers and Graphene Oxide. Rev Ciencias Tecnicas Agropecuarias. 2019; 28, 1-10. E-ISSN: 2071-0054
  6. Maciel Nde OR, Ferreira JB, Vieira Jda S, Ribeiro CGD, Lopes FPD, Margem FM, et al. Comparative tensile strength analysis between epoxy composites reinforced with curaua fiber and glass fiber. J Materials Res Technol. 2018; 7: 561-565.
  7. Santos RD, Ferreira SR, Oliveira GE, Silva FA, Souza FG, Toledo Filho RD. Influence of alkaline hornification treatment cycles on the mechanical behavior in curaua fibers. Macromol Symp. 2018; 381: 1800096.
  8. Berglund L, Noel M, Aitomaki Y, Oman T, Oksman K. production potential of cellulose nanofibers from industrial residues: Efficiency and nanofiber characteristics. Industrial Crops and Products. 2016; 92: 84-92.
  9. Chen YW, Lee HV. Revalorization of selected municipal solid wastes as new precursors of “green” nanocellulose via a novel one-pot isolation system: A source perspective. Int J Biological Macromolecules. 2018; 107: 78-92.
  10. Jonoobi M, Oladi R, Davoudpour Y, Oksman K, Dufresne A, Hamzeh Y, et al. Different preparation methods and properties of nanostructured cellulose from various natural resources and residues: A review. Cellulose. 2015; 22: 935-969.
  11. Watkins D, Nuruddin M, Hosur M, Tcherbi-Narteh A, Jeelani S. Extraction and characterization of lignin from different biomass resources. Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 2015; 4: 26-32.
  12. Kim JH, Shim BS, Kim HS, Lee YJ, Min SK, Jang D, et al. Review of Nanocellulose for Sustainable Future Materials. Int J of Precis Eng and Manuf Green Tech. 2015; 2: 197-213.
  13. Sanchez MP, Sulbaran-Rangel BC, Tejeda A, Zurita F. Evaluation of three lignocellulosic wastes as a source of biodegradable carbon for denitrification in treatment wetlands. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2020; 17: 4679-4692.
  14. Simonassi NT, Braga FO, Monteiro SN. Processing of a green Fiber-Reinforced composite of High-Performance curaua fiber in polyester. JOM. 2018; 70: 1958-1964.
  15. Amorim F do C, Souza JFB de Reis, J. M. L. dos. The Quasi-static and dynamic mechanical behavior of epoxy matrix composites reinforced with curaua fibers. Materials Research. 2018; 21.
  16. Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal LT. Book: Natural Fibers, Biopolymers, and Biocomposites, CRC Press: Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, 2005. ISBN: 978-0-8493-1741-5 (Print), 978-0-203-50820-6 (e Book).
  17. Zhou Y, Fan M, Chen L. Interface and bonding mechanisms of plant fibre composites: An overview. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2016; 101: 31-45.
  18. Abdul Khalil HPS, Bhat AH, Ireana Yusra AF. Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: a review. carbohydrate polymers. 2012; 87: 963-979.
  19. Dicker MPM, Duckworth PF, Baker AB, Francois G, Hazzard MK, Weaver PM. Green Composites: A review of material attributes and complementary applications. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2014; 56: 280-289.
  20. La Mantia FP, Morreale M. Green Composites: A Brief Review. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2011; 42: 579-588.
  21. Ramamoorthy SK, Skrifvars M, Persson A. A review of natural fibers used in biocomposites: plant, animal and regenerated cellulose fibers. Polymer Reviews. 2015; 55: 107-162.
  22. Satyanarayana KG, Arizaga GGC, Wypych F. Biodegradable composites based on lignocellulosic fibers-an overview. Progress in Polymer Science. 2009; 34: 982-1021.
  23. Satyanarayana KG, Ramos LP, Wypych F. Comparative study of Brazilian natural fibers and their composites with others. In: Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites (Eds. S. Thomas, L.A. Pothan). Chapter 18. Publishers: Old City Publishing, Inc., USA, 2009b, 473-522. ISBN No: 978-2-914610-99-5.
  24. Thakur VK, Thakur MK, Gupta RK. Review: Raw natural Fiber-Based polymer composites. International Journal of Polymer Analysis and Characterization. 2014; 19: 256-271.
  25. Araujo JR. de. Compositos de polietileno de alta densidade reforcados com fibra de curaua obtidos por extrusao e injecao (High Density Polyethylene Composites Reinforced with Curaua Fiber obtained by Extrusion and Injection), Master's Dissertation, State University of Campinas, Brazil, 2009.
  26. Edhirej A, Sapuan SM, Jawaid M, Zahari NI. Cassava/Sugar palm fiber reinforced cassava starch hybrid composites: physical, thermal and structural properties. Int J Biological Macromolecules. 2017; 101: 75-83.
  27. Leao AL, Souza SF, Cherian BM, Frollini E, Thomas S, Pothan LA, Kottaisamy M. Agro-Based biocomposites for industrial applications. Molecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals. 2010; 522: 18/[318]-27/[327].
  28. Leman Z, Sapuan SM, Saifol AM, Maleque MA, Ahmad MMHM. Moisture absorption behavior of sugar palm fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Materials & Design. 2008; 29: 1666-1670.
  29. Sapuan SM, Maleque MA. Design and fabrication of natural woven fabric reinforced epoxy composite for household telephone stand. Materials & Design. 2005; 26: 65-71.
  30. Silva R, Haraguchi SK, Muniz EC, Rubira AF. Aplicacoes de fibras lignocelulosicas na quimica de polimeros e em compositos (Applications of Lignocellulosic Fibers in Polymers and Composites Chemistry). Quim Nova. 2009; 32: 661-671.
  31. Santos AWL. dos Lima IV, Souza IBF de, Francisco JD, Franco PA, Oliveira PF de, et al. Piso Produzido a partir de Fibras Vegetais (Floor Produced from Vegetable Fibers). E- xacta, Belo Horizonte). E- xacta, Belo Horizonte. 2011; 4: 59 - 64. ISSN:1984-3151
  32. Satyanarayana KG, Guimaraes JL, Wypych F. Studies on lignocellulosic fibers of Brazil. Part I: Source, Production, Morphology, Properties and Applications. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2007; 38: 1694-1709.
  33. Satyanarayana KG, Thais HSFS, Bowman. Chapter in Book: Lignocellulosic composite materials. ed. Susheel Kalia; springer series on polymer and composite materials; Springer: Dehradun, India, 2017; 1-96.
  34. Acai Palm Wikipedia. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A%C3% A7a%C3%AD_palm (Accessed on 4 October 2017).
  35. Spinace MAS, Janeiro LG, Bernardino FC, Grossi TA, Paoli MAD. Poliolefinas reforcadas com fibras vegetais curtas: sisal × curaua (polyolefins reinforced with short vegetable fibers: Sisal × CurauA). Polimeros. 2011; 21: 168-174.
  36. White Curaua Image. Available online: https://www.oimpacto.com.br/destaque/ artesanato-tapajonico-exposto-na-vitrine-cultural-da-copa-do-mundo (Acessed on 12 November, 2013).
  37. Image of purple Curaua. Available online: https://aguabrancaonline.blogspot.com.br/ 2012/08/a-beleza-e-o-poder-da-bromelia-da.html (Accessed on 12 November 2013).
  38. Maranho AS, Paiva AV. de. Producao de Mudas de Physocalymma scaberrimum em Substratos Compostos por Diferentes Porcentagens de Residuo Orgânico de Acai (Production of Physocalymma scaberrimum seedlings in substrates composed of different percentages of organic residue from Acai). Floresta. 2012; 42: 399.
  39. Martins MA, Pessoa JDC, Goncalves PS, Souza FI, Mattoso LHC. Thermal and Mechanical Properties of the Acai Fiber/Natural Rubber Composites. J Mater Sci. 2008; 43: 6531-6538.
  40. Illenseer R, Paulilo MTS. Crescimento e Eficiencia Na Utilizacao de Nutrientes Em Plantas Jovens de Euterpe Edulis Mart. Sob Dois Niveis de Irradiância, Nitrogenio e Fosforo (Growth and Efficiency in the Use of Nutrients in Young Plants by Euterpe Edulis Mart. Under Two Levels of Irradiance, Nitrogen and Phosphorus). Acta Bot Bras. 2002; 16: 385-394.
  41. Martins MA, Mattoso LHC, Pessoa JDC. Comportamento termico e caracterizacao morfologica das fibras de mesocarpo e caroco do acai (Euterpe oleracea Mart.) (Thermal behavior and morphological characterization of mesocarp fibers and acai kernel - Euterpe oleracea Mart.). Rev. Brasileira de Fruticultura. 2009; 31: 1150-1157.
  42. Accorsi WR, Barros MAA de B. Morfologia do Fruto e da Semente de Euterpe Edulis, Mart (Fruit and Seed Morphology of Euterpe Edulis, Mart).Proceedings of E.S.A. Luiz de Queiroz. 1974; 701-711.
  43. Martins MA, Mattoso LH, Pessoa JDC. Comportamento Termico da Fibra de Acai (Thermal Behavior of Acai Fiber). Sao Carlos: EMBRAPA. 2005.
  44. Oliveira MSP, Neto JTF, Pena RS. Acai: Tecnicas de Cultivo e Processamento (Acai: Cultivation and Processing Techniques). In: 7 ° Flor ParA - Fruit, Floriculture and Agroindustry Week, Belem, ParA, Brazil. 2007.
  45. Valenca PMA, Frota CA. Misturas Areia - Asfalto com Fibra do Acai e Residuo da Construcao Civil para a Cidade de Manaus (Mixtures of Sand - Asphalt with Acai Fiber and Construction Waste for the City of Manaus). T e C Amazônia, Ano 9, n. 21, 2011.
  46. Available online: http://www.ceapac.org.br (Accessed on 12 November 2013).
  47. Santos ASA, Machado IS, Leao AL, Ramos AA. Concentracoes de BAP e TDZ na Propagacao In Vitro de CurauA (Ananas erectifolius L. B. Smith) (BAP and TDZ concentrations in the In Vitro Propagation of CurauA -Ananas erectifolius L. B. Smith). Biotecnologia Ciencia e Desenvolvimento. 2005; 35: 62-65.
  48. Angrizani CC. Compositos Laminados Hibridos de CurauA/Vidro: AnAlise mecânica, Experimental e Teorica (CurauA / Glass Hybrid Laminated Composites: Mechanical, Experimental and Theoretical Analysis). Master's Dissertation, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil. 2011.
  49. Correa AC, Teixeria EM, Marconcini JM, Pessan LA, Mattoso LHC. Nanofibras de Celulose a Partir de Fibras de CurauA (Cellulose Nanofibers from CurauA Fibers). In: Proceedings of the 10th Brazilian Polymer Congress. Foz do Iguacu-PR, Brazil. 2009.
  50. Tomczak F. Estudos sobre a estrutura e propriedades de fibras de coco e curauA do Brasil (Studies on the structure and properties of Brazilian coconut and curauA fibers). Post graduation Program in Materials Engineering and Science (PIPE), Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, Brazil. 2010.
  51. Ornaghi HL, da Silva HSP, Zattera AJ, Amico SC. Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Curaua Composites. J Appl Polym Sci. 2012; 125: E110-E116.
  52. Spinace MAS, Janeiro LG, Bernardino FC, De Paoli MA. Caracterizacao de Fibras de Sisal e CurauA Visando Aplicacao em Compositos Polimericos (Characterization of Sisal and CurauA Fibers for Application in Polymeric Composites). In: Proceedings of the 32 ° SBQ - Annual Meeting of the Brazilian Chemical Society, Fortaleza, Brazil. 2009.
  53. Tomczak F, Satyanarayana KG, Sydenstricker THD. Studies on Lignocellulosic Fibers of Brazil: Part III - Morphology and Properties of Brazilian CurauA Fibers. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2007; 38: 2227-2236.
  54. Cordeiro IMCC, Satana AC de, Lameira OA, Silva IM. Economical Analysis of Cultivation Systems with Schizolobium parahyba var. amazonicum (Huber ex Ducke) Barneby (Parica) and Ananas comosus var. erectifolius (L.B. Smith) Coppus e Leal (Curaua) crop at Aurora Para, Brazil. Rev. de la Facultad de Agronomia de la Universidad del Zulia. 2009, 26: 243 - 265.
  55. Silva HSP da. 2010. Desenvolvimento de Compositos Polimericos com Fibras de CurauA e Hibridos com Fibras de Vidro (Development of Polymeric Composites with CurauA Fibers and Hybrids with Glass Fibers). Master’s Dissertation, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil,2010.
  56. Silva RV, Aquino EMF. Curaua Fiber: A New Alternative to Polymeric Composites. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites. 2008; 27: 103-112.
  57. Caraschi JC, Leao AL. Mechanical properties of curauA fiber reinforced polypropylene composites, in ISNaPol. 2000; 450-453.
  58. Luz, J.F., Lenz, D.M. 2011. Compositos de Polipropileno Virgem e Reprocessado com Fibra de CurauA Obtidos por Injecao (Virgin Polypropylene Composites Reprocessed with CurauA Fiber Made by Injection). Rev. de Iniciacao Cientifica da ULBRA, Cachoeira do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, 2011.
  59. De Oliveira Monteiro, M. B, Willemen Pereira, R. P, Dos Santos Abreu, H. AnAlise Composicional Por Espectrometria de Infravermelho Da Lignina de Eucalyptus Urophylla S. T. Blake Tratados Com Reguladores de Crescimento (Compositional Analysis by Infrared Spectroscopy of the Lignin of Eucalyptus urophylla S. T. Blake Treated with Growth Regulators). BBR 2013; 1: 48-56.
  60. Zah R, Hischier R, Leao AL, Braun I. Curau A fibers in the automobile industry - a Sustainability Assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2007; 15: 1032-1040.
  61. Pires EN, Merlini C, Al-Qureshi HA, Salmoria GV, Barra GMO. Effect of alkaline treatment of jute fibers on the mechanical behavior of epoxy matrix composites. The Influence of Alkaline Treatment on Jute Fiber- Reinforced Epoxy Resin Composite. Polymers. 2012; 22: 339-344.
  62. Sanchez EMS, Cavani CS, Leal CV, Sanchez CG. Unsaturated polyester resin composite with sugarcane bagasse: influence of fiber treatment on properties. Unsaturated Polyester Resin Composite with Sugarcane Bagasse: Influence of Fiber Treatment on Properties. Polymers. 2010; 20: 194-200.
  63. Belgacem MN, Gandini A. The Surface Modification of Cellulose Fibres for Use as Reinforcing Elements in Composite Materials. Composite Interfaces. 2005; 12: 41-75.
  64. Belgacem MN, Gandini A. Surface Modification of Cellulose Fibres. Polimeros. 2005; 15: 114-121.
  65. Wei L, McDonald A. A Review on Grafting of Biofibers for Biocomposites. Materials. 2016; 9: 303.
  66. Albinante SR, Pacheco EBAV, Visconte LLY. Review of chemical treatments of natural fiber for blending with polyolefins. Review of Chemical Treatments of Natural Fiber for Mixing with Polyolefins. Quim. Nova. 2013; 36: 114-122.
  67. Barreto ACH, Costa MM, Sombra ASB, Rosa DS, Nascimento RF, Mazzetto SE, et al. Chemically Modified Banana Fiber: Structure, Dielectrical Properties and Biodegradability. J Polym Environ. 2010; 18: 523-531.
  68. Brigida AIS, Calado VMA, Goncalves LRB, Coelho MAZ. Effect of Chemical Treatments on Properties of Green Coconut Fiber. Carbohydr Polym. 2010; 79: 832-838.
  69. de Campos A, Tonoli GHD, Marconcini JM, Mattoso LHC, Klamczynski A, Gregorski KS, et al. TPS/PCL Composite Reinforced with Treated Sisal Fibers: Property, Biodegradation and Water-Absorption. J Polym Environ. 2013; 21: 1-7.
  70. Razera IAT, Frollini E. Composites Based on Jute Fibers and Phenolic Matrices: Properties of Fibers and Composites. J Appl Polym Sci. 2004; 91: 1077-1085.
  71. Monteiro SN, Terrones LAH, D’Almeida JRM. Mechanical Performance of Coir Fiber/Polyester Composites. Polymer Testing. 2008; 27: 591-595.
  72. Monteiro SN, Lopes FPD, Barbosa AP, Bevitori AB, Silva ILAD, Costa LLD. Natural Lignocellulosic Fibers as Engineering Materials—An Overview. Metall and Mat Trans A. 2011; 42: 2963-2974.
  73. Monteiro SN, Satyanarayana KG, Ferreira AS, Nascimento DCO, Lopes FPD, Silva ILA, et al. Selection of High Strength Natural Fibers. MatEria (Rio J.). 2010; 15: 488-505.
  74. Monteiro SN, Lopes FPD, Nascimento DCO, Ferreira ADS, Satyanarayana KG. Processing and Properties of Continuous and Aligned Curaua Fibers Incorporated Polyester Composites. J Mater Res Technol. 2013; 2: 2-9.
  75. Nascimento DCO, Ferreira AS, Monteiro SN, Aquino RCMP, Kestur SG. Studies on the Characterization of Piassava Fibers and Their Epoxy Composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2012; 43: 353-362.
  76. Pereira PHF, Rosa MdeF, Cioffi MOH, de Carvalho Benini KCC, Milanese AC, Voorwald HJC, et al. Vegetal Fibers in Polymeric Composites: A Review. Polimeros. 2015; 25: 9-22.
  77. Brugnago RJ, Satyanarayana KG, Wypych F, Ramos LP. The Effect of Steam Explosion on the Production of Sugarcane Bagasse/Polyester Composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2011; 42: 364-370.
  78. Rosa MF, Chiou B, Medeiros ES, Wood DF, Williams TG, Mattoso LHC, et al. Effect of Fiber Treatments on Tensile and Thermal Properties of Starch/Ethylene Vinyl Alcohol Copolymers/Coir Biocomposites. Bioresour Technol. 2009; 100: 5196-5202.
  79. Saha P, Chowdhury S, Roy D, Adhikari B, Kim JK, Thomas S. A Brief Review on the Chemical Modifications of Lignocellulosic Fibers for Durable Engineering Composites. Polym Bull. 2016; 73: 587-620.
  80. Simao JA, Carmona VB, Marconcini JM, Mattoso LHC, Barsberg ST, Sanadi AR. Effect of Fiber Treatment Condition and Coupling Agent on the Mechanical and Thermal Properties in Highly Filled Composites of Sugarcane Bagasse Fiber/PP. Mat Res. 2016; 19: 746-751.
  81. Tanobe VOA, Sydenstricker THD, Munaro M, Amico SC. A Comprehensive Characterization of Chemically Treated Brazilian Sponge-Gourds (Luffa Cylindrica). Polymer Testing. 2005; 24: 474-482.
  82. Vilay V, Mariatti M, Taib RM, Todo M. Effect of Fiber Surface Treatment and Fiber Loading on the Properties of Bagasse Fiber–Reinforced Unsaturated Polyester Composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2008; 68: 631-638.
  83. Kalia S, Dufresne A, Cherian BM, Kaith BS, AvErous L, Njuguna J, et al. Cellulose-Based Bio- and Nanocomposites: A Review. Int J Polym Sci. 2011; 1-35.
  84. Kalia S, Kaith BS, Kaur I. Cellulose fibers: Bio- and nano-polymer composites: Green chemistry and technology. Springer-Verlag. New York. ISBN: 978-3-642-17369-1.
  85. Kabir MM, Wang H, Lau KT, Cardona F. Chemical Treatments on Plant-Based Natural Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composites: An Overview. Compos B Eng. 2012; 43: 2883-2892.
  86. Mahjoub R, Yatim JM, Sam ARM, Hashemi SH. Tensile Properties of Kenaf Fiber Due to Various Conditions of Chemical Fiber Surface Modifications. Construction and Building Materials. 2014; 55: 103-113.
  87. de Campos A, Teodoro KBR, Marconcini JM, Mattoso LHC, Martins-Franchetti SM. Efeito Do Tratamento Das Fibras Nas Propriedades Do Biocomposito de Amido TermoplAstico/Policaprolactona/Sisal. Polimeros. 2011; 21: 217-222.
  88. Moraes AG. Estudo do Ion Borohidreto como Agente Protetor de Fibras de Sisal no Tratamento em Meio Alcalino. Study of Borohydride Ion as a Protective Agent for Sisal Fibers in the Treatment in Alkaline Environment. Master’s Dissertation, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre. Brazil. 2010.
  89. Moraes AGO, Sierakowski MR, Amico SC. The Novel Use of Sodium Borohydride as a Protective Agent for the Chemical Treatment of Vegetable Fibers. Fibers Polym. 2012; 13: 641-646.
  90. Pereira RD, Oliveira SR, Siqueira GR, Costa MS, Assis TAM, Donnici CL, et al. Reducao de Esteres Alifaticos por Borohidreto de Sodio em Microondas. Reduction of Aliphatic Esters by Sodium Borohydride in Microwaves. In: Anais do 34 ° SBQ - Annual Meeting of the Brazilian Chemical Society. Florianopolis. 2011.
  91. Candido RG. Use of Lignocellulosic Waste Cellulose to obtain high value-added products. Master's Dissertation, Lorena School of Engineering, University of Sao Paulo, Lorena, Brazil. 2011.
  92. Figueiredo AFB. Producao de Celulose Microcristalina a partir de Pasta de Sulfito Acido (Microcrystalline Cellulose Production from Acid Sulphite Paste). Master's Dissertation. University of Aveiro. Portugal. 2008.
  93. Georg IC. Modeling and Simulation of Kraft Anthraquinone Pulping. Master's Dissertation, Federal University of Santa Catarina. Florianopolis. Brazil. 2000.
  94. Knill CJ, Kennedy JF. Degradation of Cellulose under Alkaline Conditions. Carbohydr Polym. 2003; 51: 281-300.
  95. Silva DJ. AnAlise de Alimentos: MEtodos Quimicos e Biologicos (Food Analysis: Chemical and Biological Methods). 3rd Edition. Publishers: Federal University of Vicosa, Vic?osa, of Minas Gerais, Brazil. 2006.
  96. Agopyan V, Savastano H, John VM, Cincotto MA. Developments on Vegetable Fibre–Cement Based Materials in Sao Paulo, Brazil: An Overview. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2005; 27: 527-536.
  97. Corradini E, de Morais LC, Rosa MdeF, Mazzetto SE, Mattoso LHC, Agnelli JAM. A Preliminary Study for the Use of Natural Fibers as Reinforcement in Starch-Gluten-Glycerol Matrix. Macromol. Symp. 2006; 245-246: 558-564.
  98. Gomes TS, Visconte LLY, Pacheco EBAV. Replacement of Fiberglass by Banana Fiber in High Density Polyethylene Composites. Part 1. Mechanical and Thermal Evaluation. Polimeros. 2013; 23: 206-211.
  99. Leao MA. Fibras de Licuri: Um Reforco Alternativo de Compositos PolimEricos (Licuri Fibers: An Alternative Reinforcement of Polymeric Composites). Master's Dissertation, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil. 2008.
  100. Satyanarayana KG, Wypych F. Characterization of natural fibers, In: Engineering biopolymers: homopolymers, blends and composites. Fakirov S, Bhattacharyya D (Eds.). Auckland, New Zealand, Munich: Hanser Publishers. 2007; 3-47.
  101. Sen T, Jagannatha Reddy HN. Application of sisal, bamboo, coir and jute natural composites in structural upgradation. Int J Innov Manage Technol. 2011; 2: 186-191.
  102. Wiedman GA, Costa CZ, Nahuz MA. Coir based fiberboard for moulded components. In: Mattoso LHC, Leao AL, Frollini E. (Eds.), Natural Polymers and Composites (3rd International Symposium - ISNaPol 2000). Publishers: Embrapa Agricultural Instrumentation, Sao Paulo University, Sao Paulo State University, Sao Carlos, Sao Paulo, Brazil. 2000; 488-492.
  103. Fermolselli KKG, SpinacE MAS, Lambert CS, De Paoli MA. Tratamento superficial de fibra curauA para reforco de compositos para polimeros (Surface treatment of curauA fiber for reinforcement of composites for polymers). In: 7th Brazilian Polymer Congress, Belo Horizonte. Minas Gerais. Brazil. 2003; 220-221.
  104. MothE CG, Araujo CR, Hui WS. DMA study of polyurethane composites reinforced with curauA fiber. In: 7th Brazilian Polymer Congress, Belo Horizonte. Minas Gerais. Brazil. 2003; 274-278.
  105. Kim JT, Netravali AN. Mercerization of Sisal Fibers: Effect of Tension on Mechanical Properties of Sisal Fiber and Fiber-Reinforced Composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2010; 41: 1245-1252.
  106. Santos FA, de Queiroz JH, Colodette JL, Fernandes SA, Guimaraes VM, Rezende ST. Potential of Sugarcane Straw for Ethanol Production. Quim. Nova. 2012; 35: 1004-1010.
  107. Silva MC. Contribuicao do Estudo de Compositos de Espuma Rigida de Poliuretana Reforcada com Residuo de Celulose (Contribution of the Study of Rigid Polyurethane Foam Composites Reinforced with Cellulose Residue). Doctoral Thesis, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil. 2008.
  108. Miranda CS, Fiuza RP, Guimaraes DH, Carvalho GGP, Carvalho RF, JosE NM. Tratamento Quimico do Residuo de Piacava para Aplicacao em Compositos PolimEricos (Chemical Treatment of Piassava Residue for Application in Polymeric Composites). In: Proceedings of the 19th Brazilian Congress of Engineering and Materials Science. Campos do Jordao, Sao Paulo, Brazil. 2010.
  109. Nagaishi T. Acai (Euterpe oleracea Mart.): Extrativismo, Caracteristicas, Energia e Renda em uma Comunidade na Ilha de Marajo/PA. Master's Dissertation, Federal Rural University of the Amazon, Belem, ParA, Brazil. 2007.
  110. Kalia S, Kaith BS, Kaur I. Pretreatments of Natural Fibers and Their Application as Reinforcing Material in Polymer Composites-A Review. Polym Eng Sci. 2009; 49: 1253-1272.
  111. Nam TH, Ogihara S, Tung NH, Kobayashi S. Effect of Alkali Treatment on Interfacial and Mechanical Properties of Coir Fiber Reinforced Poly (Butylene Succinate) Biodegradable Composites. Compos B Eng. 2011; 42: 1648-1656.
  112. de Oliveira PF, Marques MFV, Merat LC. Estudo de Metodologias de Tratamento Alcalino em Fibras Vegetais de Malva (Study of Alkaline Treatment Methodologies in Malva Vegetable Fibers). In: Proceedings of the 12th Brazilian Polymer Congress. Florianopolis. Santa Catarina. Brazil. 2013.
  113. Tanobe VOA, Flores-Sahagun THS, Amico SC, Muniz GIB, Satyanarayana KG. Sponge Gourd (Luffa Cylindrica) Reinforced Polyester Composites: Preparation and Properties. Def Sci J. 2014; 64: 273-280.
  114. Carvalho LFM. Fibras de Palha de Carnaúba: Caracterizacao TErmica e Aplicacões em Compositos (Carnauba Straw Fibers: Thermal Characterization and Applications in Composites). Master's Dissertation, Federal University of Piaui, Teresina, Brazil, 2004.
  115. Junior FGS, Picciani PHS, da Rocha EV, de Oliveira GE. Study of the Mechanical and Electrical Properties of Polyaniline Modified Curaua Fibers. Polimeros. 2010; 20: 377-382.
  116. Cardoso PHM, Bastian FL, ThirE RMSM. Producao de Laminados Compositos de Epoxi/Fibras de CurauA (Production of Epoxy Composite Laminates / CurauA Fibers). In: Proceedings of the 12th Brazilian Polymer Congress, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina. Brazil. 2013.
  117. Mahato DN, Prasad RN, Mathur BK. Surface Morphological, Band and Lattice Structural Studies of Cellulosic Fiber Coir under Mercerization by ESCA. Ind J Pure Appl Phys. 2009; 47: 643-647.
  118. Ramirez MGL. Caracterizacao de Biocompositos de Amido TermoplAstico Reforcados com Fibra de Coco Verde (Characterization of Thermoplastic Starch Biocomposites Reinforced with Green Coconut Fiber). Doctoral Thesis, Federal University of ParanA, Curitiba. Brazil. 2011.
  119. GuitErrez MC, Rosa PTV, de Paoli M-A, Felisberti MI. Biocomposites Based on Cellulose Acetate and Short Curaua Fibers Treated with Supercritical CO2. Polimeros. 2012; 22: 295-302.
  120. Ito EN, Marconcini JM, Pessoa JDC, Rios CT, Mattoso LH, Hage E. Characterization of Recycled Polyolefin Composites with Acai Fibers. In: Proceedings of the 9th Brazilian Polymer Congress, Campina Grande. 2007.
  121. Rabello M. A book of Aditivacao of Polymers. Artliber Publishers Ltd., Sao Paulo; ISBN: 8588098016. 2000.