The global expansion of oil palm cultivation has become a defining feature of tropical land-use change in the 21st century. With over 27 million hectares planted worldwide, primarily across Southeast Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, and Latin America, oil palm represents one of the most economically lucrative yet ecologically contentious crops globally [1]. The crop contributes significantly to national gross domestic product (GDP), rural livelihoods, and global vegetable oil supply. Still, its growth has also triggered extensive deforestation, biodiversity loss, and social conflicts in forest frontier regions. In Indonesia and Malaysia, the two largest producers accounting for more than 85% of global output, oil palm plantations have replaced millions of hectares of primary and secondary forests, undermining the ecological integrity of landscapes and threatening climate resilience [2].

As international pressure mounts to address environmental degradation linked to oil palm cultivation, sustainable land-use alternatives have garnered greater attention from researchers, policymakers, and industry stakeholders. Among these alternatives, agroforestry, the deliberate integration of trees with crops and/or livestock in the same land unit, has emerged as a promising approach to reconcile production with conservation goals [3]. Agroforestry systems are widely recognized for their multifunctional benefits, including enhanced biodiversity, improved soil fertility, increased carbon sequestration, and diversified economic outputs. Their application within oil palm plantations has been proposed as a transformative model that mitigates the ecological drawbacks of monoculture while supporting rural development objectives [4].

Recent studies have demonstrated the feasibility and ecological effectiveness of integrating agroforestry into oil palm landscapes. Evidence from pilot programs and smallholder initiatives indicates that agroforestry can restore ecological functions by increasing structural complexity, promoting native vegetation, and creating habitats for a variety of fauna [5]. These enhancements not only deliver ecosystem services critical to climate and watershed regulation but also open pathways for alternative income streams, such as non-timber forest products and tourism-based enterprises. The environmental co-benefits of agroforestry, including reduced chemical input, better nutrient cycling, and microclimate stabilization, further strengthen its potential as a cornerstone of climate-smart agriculture [6].

In parallel, eco-tourism has emerged as a dynamic and increasingly relevant sector for sustainable rural development. Defined as responsible travel to natural areas that conserves the environment and improves the well-being of local people, eco-tourism has grown by more than 20% annually in certain regions of Southeast Asia over the past decade [7]. It is widely viewed as an effective tool for supporting biodiversity conservation, promoting cultural exchange, and generating income for communities living in or near environmentally sensitive areas. As rural areas seek to diversify livelihoods amid agricultural uncertainties, integrating eco-tourism with agroecological systems offers a unique synergy that aligns with both conservation and development agendas [8].

Despite the growing body of research on agroforestry and eco-tourism as separate domains, their integration particularly within oil palm landscapes remains underexplored and poorly understood. While isolated case studies and experimental projects have reported positive ecological and socio-economic outcomes from such integration, there is a lack of systematic synthesis on how agroforestry can be harnessed on oil palm plantations specifically for eco-tourism purposes [9]. This knowledge gap limits the scalability and institutional adoption of agroforestry-based tourism models, especially in regions heavily reliant on palm oil economies. Moreover, existing research often lacks cross-comparative analysis across ecological zones, governance regimes, and market contexts, resulting in fragmented insights that hinder policy translation and investment planning [10].

Given these challenges, there is an urgent need to comprehensively evaluate existing scientific evidence on the interface between agroforestry, oil palm cultivation, and eco-tourism. A systematic literature review (SLR) provides a rigorous methodological approach to achieve this objective. By synthesizing peer-reviewed empirical findings from diverse geographies and disciplinary lenses, an SLR enables the identification of key themes, knowledge gaps, and enabling factors that shape the viability of agroforestry-based eco-tourism in oil palm contexts [11]. This method also ensures transparency, replicability, and methodological neutrality, which are essential for informing evidence-based policies and sustainable land-use strategies.

The integration of agroforestry into oil palm plantations for eco-tourism not only holds ecological and economic promise but also aligns with broader goals such as climate adaptation, sustainable landscape management, and the diversification of rural economies. It offers a pathway for reconciling the contested land-use legacy of palm oil with emerging sustainability paradigms, including nature-based solutions and community-led development [12]. However, a clearer understanding of the mechanisms, models, and outcomes associated with such integration is needed to guide future research, planning, and implementation.

Therefore, the objective of this study is to systematically explore and synthesize current academic literature on the potential roles, challenges, and opportunities of agroforestry practices within oil palm plantations for supporting eco-tourism development. Through a structured analysis of 38 peer-reviewed research articles sourced via ScienceDirect, this study aims to identify recurring patterns, thematic clusters, and evidence gaps that define this emerging interdisciplinary field.

To guide the analytical focus, this study is directed by the following research questions:

• What are the ecological, economic, and socio-cultural outcomes of integrating agroforestry practices within oil palm plantations for eco-tourism development?
• What enabling conditions, barriers, and governance mechanisms influence the effectiveness and scalability of agroforestry-based eco-tourism models in oil palm-producing regions?

The answers to these questions are critically examined in the Discussion section and serve as the basis for the study's conclusions and policy implications.

The intersection of agroforestry, oil palm cultivation, and ecotourism represents an emerging multidisciplinary field gaining momentum in sustainability discourse. Over the past two decades, agroforestry has been widely studied as a land management system capable of delivering ecological, economic, and social benefits across tropical landscapes. Simultaneously, eco-tourism has been promoted as a sustainable rural development strategy that harmonizes environmental preservation with local livelihood enhancement. However, the integration of these two approaches specifically within oil palm-dominated landscapes remains under-represented in the scholarly literature, necessitating a systematic review of current knowledge.

Agroforestry, defined as the intentional integration of trees and shrubs into agricultural systems, has been shown to enhance ecosystem services, biodiversity, and productivity in a variety of biophysical and socio-economic contexts [13]. Multiple studies have confirmed that agroforestry improves soil fertility through increased organic matter, reduces erosion, and promotes more stable microclimates. In tropical environments, the inclusion of multi-strata vegetation in plantation landscapes is particularly beneficial, as it mimics natural forest structures and supports a broader range of flora and fauna. Agroforestry systems are also associated with increased resilience to climate shocks, thanks to their diversification of species, products, and income streams [14].

In the context of oil palm plantations, agroforestry has attracted growing interest as a means of mitigating the environmental trade-offs of monoculture expansion. Traditional oil palm cultivation has been linked with biodiversity loss, water pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and land-use conflicts [15]. Introducing agroforestry practices into oil palm systems, such as intercropping with fruit trees, medicinal plants, or timber species, can help restore ecological function while diversifying economic returns. Studies in Indonesia and Malaysia have reported higher species richness and biomass in mixed-cropping systems than in monoculture oil palm stands, along with reduced dependency on synthetic inputs. These ecological co-benefits contribute to landscape restoration efforts and can form the ecological foundation for nature-based tourism initiatives [16].

Meanwhile, eco-tourism has become one of the fastest-growing segments of the global tourism industry, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) estimated at 14–18% globally and even higher in biodiversity-rich countries [17]. Defined by its commitment to responsible travel, environmental conservation, and community empowerment, eco-tourism offers a framework for sustainable rural development that aligns well with agroecological principles. In regions affected by land-use change and deforestation, eco-tourism has emerged as a livelihood alternative that incentivizes conservation while promoting environmental education and cultural preservation [18].

Empirical studies have documented the success of eco-tourism ventures in tropical forest landscapes, particularly when managed through community-based approaches. In countries such as Costa Rica, Vietnam, and the Philippines, locally driven eco-tourism projects have led to increased household incomes, strengthened social cohesion, and enhanced biodiversity protection. These cases often involve agroforestry systems as the ecological backbone of tourism landscapes, providing shade, food, and aesthetic appeal to tourists while maintaining ecological connectivity [19].

Despite the recognized benefits of both agroforestry and eco-tourism, their integration within oil palm landscapes remains in its infancy. Most studies have treated these domains separately, focusing either on the environmental impacts of agroforestry or on the socio-economic outcomes of eco-tourism. Very few empirical investigations have explicitly examined the synergies between the two, particularly in palm oil-producing countries such as Indonesia, where landscape multifunctionality is increasingly essential. The limited integration is partly due to policy silos that divide forestry, agriculture, and tourism sectors, as well as a lack of cross-sectoral research frameworks [20].

One area of growing interest is the use of agroforestry-based tourism as a tool for conservation financing. By generating income from tourism, communities can reduce pressure on land and natural resources while investing in forest maintenance and ecological infrastructure. Agroforestry landscapes that are rich in biodiversity and cultural heritage are particularly well-suited for eco-tourism development, as they offer unique experiential value to visitors. However, ensuring the sustainability of such ventures requires clear tenure arrangements, capacity-building, market access, and strong governance mechanisms [21].

Moreover, agroforestry-based eco-tourism may serve as an effective instrument for enhancing climate resilience in palm oil landscapes. Diversified agroecosystems are less vulnerable to pests, disease outbreaks, and price volatility, which, in turn, stabilize rural incomes and reduce migration pressures. When embedded in a tourism framework, agroforestry provides both ecological value and economic incentive, reinforcing local stewardship of natural resources. In regions undergoing oil palm transition or rehabilitation, this integrated approach offers a strategic entry point for landscape restoration with community benefits [22].

The literature also points to the potential for agroforestry-tourism models to support biodiversity offset schemes and carbon credit programs, especially when aligned with international standards such as the RSPO (Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil) and REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation). These schemes provide an economic rationale for maintaining ecological integrity in production landscapes while opening access to new forms of green finance. The inclusion of eco-tourism as a co-benefit further enhances the appeal of such programs to investors, donors, and certification bodies [23].

Nevertheless, there remain considerable knowledge gaps regarding the institutional, ecological, and market dynamics that shape the success or failure of agroforestry-based eco-tourism in oil palm regions. Key uncertainties include optimal design configurations, scalability, profitability, and long-term sustainability. There is also a paucity of comparative studies across different socio-ecological zones, which limits generalizability and policy applicability [24]. This review addresses these gaps by offering a structured synthesis of recent research, identifying recurring patterns and evidence clusters that can inform future practice and policy.

In sum, the reviewed literature underscores a growing consensus on the complementary nature of agroforestry and eco-tourism as sustainable land-use strategies. However, their joint application in oil palm contexts is still emerging and requires greater empirical scrutiny. This study contributes to filling that gap by systematically evaluating current evidence on how agroforestry systems embedded in oil palm landscapes can catalyze eco-tourism development, generate co-benefits, and enhance landscape resilience.

This study employs the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method, structured according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) framework, to investigate the evolving intersection of agroforestry, oil palm plantations, and eco-tourism opportunities. As global pressures mount on monoculture practices for their ecological consequences, agroforestry has emerged as a sustainable alternative that enhances biodiversity, supports soil and water conservation, and diversifies rural livelihoods. In oil palm-dominated landscapes, agroforestry not only provides an environmental buffer but also offers the socio-economic potential to integrate eco-tourism activities, aligning with broader goals of sustainable development and land-use diversification. Despite its growing recognition, the application of agroforestry for eco-tourism remains underexplored in scientific literature. This study seeks to address that knowledge gap by synthesizing peer-reviewed empirical findings and conceptual perspectives to uncover how agroforestry can be harnessed on oil palm plantations to support sustainable eco-tourism development.

Figure 1 depicts the SLR process adopted in this study, following four systematic stages: identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion. The literature search was conducted exclusively through the ScienceDirect database. The initial search used the broad keyword combination “agroforestry AND oil palm,” which generated 1,204 articles. To enhance thematic precision and relevance, a refined Boolean search was applied using “agroforestry” AND “oil palm” AND (“eco-tourism” OR “land use diversification” OR “sustainable development”), which narrowed the dataset to 443 articles after excluding 761 titles not aligned with the review’s focus.

To ensure currency, a publication date filter was applied, limiting the results to works published between 2024 and 2025. This temporal refinement led to the exclusion of 336 articles, resulting in 107 recent studies. The eligibility phase filtered for document type, retaining only original research articles and removing 51 entries that fell outside this category. This left a corpus of 56 research articles. In the final inclusion stage, accessibility criteria were applied, retaining only articles available via open-access or open-archive platforms. This resulted in the exclusion of 18 articles, yielding a final dataset of 38 peer-reviewed research articles selected for full-text analysis.

All references were organized and managed in Mendeley Desktop to ensure consistent citation formatting, prevent duplication, and facilitate accurate source tracing. No primary data collection, field observations, or focus group discussions were conducted for this study. The synthesis presented in this article is derived exclusively from secondary sources, which have been rigorously screened. This approach ensures both methodological transparency and thematic reliability, offering a consolidated view of how agroforestry practices on oil palm plantations may serve as viable frameworks for eco-tourism development and sustainable land management in tropical regions.

Figure 1: Systematic Literature Review Process Based On the PRISMA Protocol.

This systematic literature review (SLR), based on 38 peer-reviewed research articles published between 2024 and 2025, identifies six dominant thematic areas reflecting the multifaceted potential of agroforestry integration in oil palm plantations for eco-tourism development. These themes are: (1) Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity Enhancement; (2) Land Use Diversification for Livelihood Improvement; (3) Agroforestry-based Eco-tourism Development Models; (4) Carbon Sequestration and Climate Regulation Functions; (5) Economic Valuation and Community-Based Enterprises; and (6) Governance, Policy, and Institutional Frameworks.

Analysis of the thematic distribution shows that the most frequently discussed topic is Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity Enhancement (71% of articles), followed by Land Use Diversification (55%), Eco-tourism Development Models (45%), Climate Regulation (42%), Economic Valuation (37%), and Governance-related Issues (34%). Notably, most articles addressed more than one theme, underscoring the interconnected nature of agroforestry’s benefits across ecological, economic, and institutional dimensions.

The dominance of ecological and biodiversity-focused literature reflects scholarly urgency in addressing the environmental degradation associated with oil palm monocultures. This emphasis also aligns with broader global shifts toward nature-based solutions (NbS) and biodiversity-centered land management. On the other hand, the relatively lower frequency of governance-related themes points to a critical gap in institutional readiness and cross-sector policy integration, an issue that, if unaddressed, could undermine long-term scalability. These patterns have significant implications for researchers and practitioners, as they highlight where the evidence base is strongest and where further empirical exploration is needed.

The following sections elaborate on each of the six themes with reference to empirical data and practical insights from the reviewed literature.

Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity Enhancement

One of the most dominant themes in the reviewed literature is the enhancement of ecosystem services through agroforestry practices in oil palm-dominated landscapes. Agroforestry has been consistently reported to significantly increase species richness, reduce soil erosion, and improve pollination services. For instance, one study demonstrated that integrating native tree species within oil palm plantations increased understory plant species diversity by 46% within a 5-year period [25], [26]. Another large-scale study in Malaysian Borneo showed that agroforestry corridors established between oil palm blocks contributed to a 32% increase in mammalian species richness, including the return of species previously classified as locally extinct [27], [28], [29].

In addition, agroforestry was found to reduce surface runoff and sediment loss by up to 74% compared to conventional monocultures [30], [31]. These ecological improvements directly support eco-tourism opportunities such as birdwatching, forest exploration, and educational tourism. A synthesis of studies on insect biodiversity reported that agroforestry plots hosted 60% more native pollinator species than control plantations, thereby increasing pollination rates and flowering periods of understory plants, key features for botanical tourism [32], [33]. Furthermore, habitat heterogeneity created by multistrata planting systems enhances the visual and ecological appeal of plantation landscapes, increasing the likelihood of attracting tourists and of obtaining biodiversity certification [34], [35].

Land Use Diversification for Livelihood Improvement

Agroforestry systems offer multifunctional land use strategies that combine ecological stewardship with economic development. Among the 38 reviewed articles, 21 specifically reported improved income security among smallholder households practicing agroforestry in oil palm plantations [36], [37]. In a longitudinal assessment conducted in West Kalimantan, households practicing polyculture agroforestry (oil palm intercropped with fruit trees and medicinal plants) saw a 42.3% increase in annual household income compared to monoculture-dependent households [38], [39].

Farmers utilizing integrated models reported higher resilience to palm oil price fluctuations due to diversified outputs such as cacao, banana, timber, and honey. In a case from South Sumatra, households involved in agroforestry-tourism cooperatives earned additional revenue from agro-tourism activities, including guided tours and organic product sales, contributing up to 38% of their annual income [40], [41]. Diversification also reduced dependence on external inputs, with average fertilizer use decreasing by 29% due to nutrient recycling in agroforestry plots [42].

Empirical evidence further supports social benefits, including enhanced food security and reduced seasonal migration. One study highlighted that 68% of agroforestry-practicing families were able to meet their nutritional needs year-round, compared to 37% of conventional oil palm farmers [43], [44]. Livelihood diversification is also linked with improved gender inclusion, as women play key roles in non-timber product processing and tourism services [45].

Agroforestry-Based Eco-Tourism Development Models

Agroforestry-based eco-tourism models are increasingly being adopted in Southeast Asia, with documented successes in Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines. In these models, agroforestry landscapes are marketed as destinations offering interactive and educational experiences. For example, the “Kampung Wisata Agro” initiative in Central Java reported a 41% increase in annual tourist visits after integrating agroforestry trails and forest bathing experiences [46], [47].

In Malaysia's Beluran District, a model agroforestry site received national recognition for hosting 12,000 tourists annually, generating over MYR 250,000 (approx. USD 56,000) in direct revenue and creating 57 part-time jobs for local youth [48]. These initiatives are often supported by partnerships between local governments, NGOs, and farmer cooperatives.

Agroforestry tourism activities documented in the literature include fruit-picking tours, traditional medicine workshops, forest education programs, and culinary experiences using agroforestry products. In some cases, such as the “EcoSilva” program in Sabah, visitor satisfaction ratings exceeded 92%, driven by immersive, nature-based offerings [49]. Furthermore, eco-tourism tied to agroforestry promotes community storytelling and cultural heritage preservation, increasing the social capital of rural areas [50].

Carbon Sequestration and Climate Regulation Functions

Agroforestry systems in oil palm plantations significantly contribute to climate change mitigation by enhancing carbon storage and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The literature indicates that mixed-species agroforestry plots can sequester between 7.1 and 12.8 Mg C ha^-1 yr^-1, with the upper range observed in systems incorporating fast-growing leguminous trees [51].

Comparative studies between monoculture and agroforestry sites in Riau and North Sumatra show carbon stock increases ranging from 39% to 58% in the latter [52]. Agroforestry also contributes to microclimate regulation, with temperature reductions of 1.3°C and increases in relative humidity of 12% observed in diversified plantations [53].

Additionally, agroforestry systems lower the carbon intensity of oil palm products, which is critical for meeting international certification standards such as RSPO (Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil) and for branding carbon-neutral tourism destinations. Agroforestry’s contribution to climate resilience, including reduced vulnerability to drought and improved water retention, was noted in 16 reviewed studies [54], [55].

Economic Valuation and Community-Based Enterprises

Economic valuation studies show that agroforestry-based oil palm landscapes deliver significantly higher total economic value (TEV) than monoculture plantations. Estimates range from USD 3,200 to USD 8,600 per hectare per year when provisioning (e.g., food, timber), regulating (e.g., carbon storage), and cultural services (e.g., tourism) are included [56], [57].

In southern Mindanao, the integration of agroforestry and tourism created eight new cooperatives focused on ecoproducts such as herbal teas, handicrafts, and essential oils. These cooperatives reported a 27% increase in member income and secured contracts with eco-lodges and international fair-trade buyers [58].

Revenue-sharing models documented in Sumatra and Sabah show that communities involved in agroforestry-tourism ventures can earn between USD 12,000 and 18,000 annually from tourism profits, used to fund community health and education initiatives [59]. Training programs in sustainable hospitality, biodiversity interpretation, and agro-product marketing have also been launched, building local capacity and retaining youth in rural areas.

Governance, Policy and Institutional Frameworks

Effective institutional arrangements are critical to scaling agroforestry-based eco-tourism. Reviewed literature emphasizes the importance of secure land tenure, clear policy integration, and collaborative governance. In regions where community land rights are recognized, agroforestry adoption rates were found to be 54% higher, and tourism participation rates 61% greater [60].

Studies highlight that policy fragmentation between agriculture, forestry, and tourism ministries hinders the mainstreaming of agroforestry-based tourism. In contrast, countries that adopted integrated landscape management policies such as Vietnam and Costa Rica show higher rates of agroforestry-tourism success [61].

Decentralized funding mechanisms, including village funds and eco-tourism incentive schemes, have been successful in sustaining local agroforestry initiatives. For instance, a pilot program in North Sulawesi allocated 12% of its village development budget to eco-agroforestry, resulting in a 28% increase in visitor numbers and higher biodiversity scores within 2 years [62]. Multi-stakeholder platforms involving academia, private sector actors, and civil society were also identified as enablers of innovation and policy coherence.

Collectively, the SLR findings underscore the multifaceted benefits of integrating agroforestry into oil palm plantations, particularly in catalyzing eco-tourism as a sustainable land-use alternative. The evidence suggests that agroforestry enhances ecological functions, diversifies rural economies, and strengthens community resilience. Furthermore, it presents a nature-based solution with high scalability and adaptability to local contexts, provided that institutional frameworks are supportive and community agency is prioritized. These insights contribute a comprehensive knowledge base to guide stakeholders, including policymakers, researchers, and practitioners, in designing integrated models that align oil palm production with biodiversity conservation and eco-tourism development.

This discussion section addresses the two research questions previously stated in the introduction: (1) What are the ecological, economic, and socio-cultural outcomes of integrating agroforestry practices within oil palm plantations for eco-tourism development? and (2) What enabling conditions, barriers, and governance mechanisms influence the effectiveness and scalability of agroforestry-based eco-tourism models in oil palm-producing regions? The synthesis draws from 38 systematically selected peer-reviewed research articles and aims to critically interpret emerging patterns, gaps, and insights.

Ecological, Economic, and Socio-Cultural Outcomes of Agroforestry-Based Eco-tourism in Oil Palm Landscapes

The integration of agroforestry within oil palm plantations for eco-tourism purposes has demonstrated multiple ecological benefits. Across tropical environments, agroforestry systems introduce heterogeneity into previously homogeneous monoculture landscapes, thereby supporting higher levels of biodiversity, enhancing soil fertility, and improving microclimatic conditions [63]. Studies show that agroforestry plots within oil palm areas host up to 65% more avian and insect diversity compared to conventional monocultures [64]. Species richness of understory vegetation and pollinators is also significantly elevated in agroforestry-integrated sites, contributing to ecological stability and resilience [65].

Soil quality improvements have been observed through reduced erosion rates, improved organic matter retention, and better nutrient cycling, largely driven by tree litter input and root dynamics [66]. Moreover, agroforestry systems sequester considerable amounts of carbon. In mixed oil palm timber systems, carbon sequestration rates ranged from 8.7 to 14.5 Mg C ha?¹ yr?¹, depending on species composition and tree age [67]. These gains make such systems eligible for climate-mitigation incentives under schemes such as REDD+ and voluntary carbon markets [68].

From an economic standpoint, agroforestry introduces diversified income opportunities, particularly through the sale of fruits, medicinal plants, timber, and eco-tourism services. In case studies from Indonesia and Ghana, farmers who adopted agroforestry within their oil palm plots reported income increases of 25–42% over a five-year period, largely due to reduced input costs and supplemental product sales [69]. Agroforestry’s synergy with eco-tourism further amplifies these gains. Tourists are attracted to diversified landscapes with scenic beauty, educational trails, and opportunities for wildlife observation, characteristics often lacking in monoculture plantations [70].

In regions where agroforestry has been linked to tourism, communities have organized homestay networks, canopy walks, guided tours, and handicraft workshops that directly utilize forest and agroforestry resources. These initiatives not only generate cash income but also promote local culture, enhance gender inclusion, and foster environmental stewardship [71].

Social cohesion is also reinforced in agroforestry-tourism systems. Participatory land-use planning and collective agroforestry management have been shown to strengthen communal decision-making and reduce land-use conflicts. In addition, educational benefits arise from eco-tourism’s emphasis on environmental awareness, which can shift local perceptions of forest and biodiversity values [72].

However, ecological and social benefits are not automatic. Several studies warn that poorly planned agroforestry systems, especially those dominated by exotic or fast-growing monoculture species, may offer limited ecosystem services and even create new ecological risks. Similarly, tourism-related activities can increase disturbance, introduce waste, and trigger cultural commodification if not carefully regulated [73].

2. Enabling Conditions, Barriers, and Governance Dynamics

The success of agroforestry-based eco-tourism depends on a complex interplay of institutional, economic, technical, and socio-cultural factors. Secure land tenure emerges as one of the most critical enabling conditions. Where communities have clearly recognized rights to manage land, agroforestry adoption is significantly higher, and tourism revenues are more equitably distributed. Conversely, unclear or contested land rights common in many oil palm-producing regions undermine long-term investment in agroecological innovation [74].

Another key enabler is access to capacity-building and extension services. Studies in Southeast Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa reveal that agroforestry-tourism models flourish in areas where training in agroecology, entrepreneurship, and tourism management is provided [75]. Without such support, many community members lack the technical skills and marketing strategies required to sustain tourism ventures or manage diversified agroforestry systems effectively.

Market access and connectivity are equally important. Remote communities face logistical barriers in attracting tourists, selling agroforestry products, and participating in green certification schemes. Innovative solutions, such as digital marketing platforms, cooperative branding, and community-based eco-labels, are increasingly being explored to overcome these limitations [76].

Policy coherence also plays a pivotal role. Fragmented governance systems where forestry, agriculture, and tourism are managed in isolation create regulatory contradictions that stifle innovation. For instance, some regions classify agroforestry systems as “non-permanent forest estates,” limiting access to public incentives or financing. Similarly, eco-tourism initiatives on agricultural land often face legal ambiguity or prohibitions [77]. Integrated land-use planning frameworks that harmonize cross-sectoral policies are essential to support multifunctional landscapes.

Financial mechanisms tailored to agroforestry-tourism integration remain underdeveloped. While donor-funded projects and NGO support can catalyze early implementation, long-term viability requires access to microfinance, payment for ecosystem services, and sustainable investment models. Public-private partnerships are increasingly seen as a vehicle to link smallholders with investors, tourists, and value chains [78].

Social inclusion is another determinant of success. Gender-sensitive approaches and recognition of indigenous knowledge systems have proven critical in sustaining agroforestry and eco-tourism initiatives. Women, in particular, play central roles in hospitality, guiding, handicraft production, and agroforestry maintenance yet often lack decision-making power or access to resources [79].

Scaling up agroforestry-based eco-tourism also faces institutional and epistemic barriers. Many policymakers and extension agents still view oil palm primarily as a monoculture commodity crop, with limited understanding of agroforestry or eco-tourism dynamics. Bridging this gap requires capacity-building not only at the community level but also within bureaucracies and academic institutions [80].

Finally, environmental education and participatory monitoring can reinforce long-term success. By involving local actors in data collection, biodiversity assessment, and tourism planning, communities are more likely to take ownership of sustainability outcomes. Mobile apps and community mapping tools are emerging as low-cost methods to support these efforts [81].

This systematic literature review reveals that agroforestry integration within oil palm landscapes offers considerable promise for ecological restoration, rural livelihood diversification, and eco-tourism development. When designed and governed appropriately, such systems can transform extractive, monoculture-oriented land-use models into multifunctional landscapes that balance conservation and development objectives.

For policymakers, the findings highlight the need to revise land-use classifications, promote cross-sectoral planning, and establish incentive mechanisms that reward ecosystem services and cultural preservation. For practitioners and communities, success depends on building capacity, securing tenure, and fostering partnerships that bridge knowledge and finance gaps. For researchers, further empirical studies are needed to test diverse agroforestry-tourism models across ecological and socio-economic gradients, particularly in underrepresented geographies.

In conclusion, integrating agroforestry with eco-tourism in oil palm contexts is not a silver bullet but a promising pathway one that demands contextual adaptation, inclusive governance, and sustained investment. With careful design and inclusive implementation, such models can contribute meaningfully to sustainable rural transformation and landscape resilience.

The systematic review of 38 selected peer-reviewed articles reveals that integrating agroforestry within oil palm plantation landscapes can deliver substantial ecological, economic, and socio-cultural benefits, especially when designed to support eco-tourism functions. Ecologically, such integration enhances biodiversity, improves soil and water quality, stabilizes microclimates, and increases carbon sequestration. Mixed systems, when properly implemented, can reduce the ecological footprint of oil palm monocultures by fostering habitat connectivity and ecological resilience across the landscape.

Economically, agroforestry systems contribute to income diversification through the production of timber, fruits, herbs, and other non-timber forest products. When combined with eco-tourism activities such as guided forest walks, homestay programs, environmental education, and local handicraft markets these systems generate additional revenue streams for rural communities. In regions with appropriate infrastructure and market access, agroforestry-tourism models have led to measurable improvements in household income and economic stability.

Socially and culturally, these integrated approaches strengthen community cohesion, empower marginalized groups (particularly women and indigenous populations), and foster stronger environmental stewardship through participatory management practices. Eco-tourism built upon agroforestry landscapes offers not only aesthetic and recreational value but also reinforces local ecological knowledge and cultural heritage.

However, the successful implementation of agroforestry-based eco-tourism in oil palm regions is not without challenges. Key enabling conditions include secure land tenure, community capacity-building, cross-sectoral policy alignment, access to financing, and inclusive governance structures. Inconsistent legal frameworks and institutional silos particularly between forestry, agriculture, and tourism sectors remain significant barriers to adoption and scaling. Moreover, weak technical knowledge, limited marketing channels, and socio-political constraints can hinder the development of viable eco-tourism enterprises in rural contexts.

Despite these constraints, the review identifies a growing number of cases where agroforestry has been effectively integrated into oil palm systems to support eco-tourism objectives. These examples provide a conceptual and practical foundation for transitioning from extractive monocultures toward multifunctional, socially inclusive, and ecologically resilient landscapes. Future strategies must focus on enhancing institutional coordination, investing in local capacities, and expanding research on region-specific models to fully unlock the potential of this integrated land-use approach.

In closing, the findings affirm that agroforestry holds significant potential as both a restorative and productive component within oil palm plantations, especially when linked to eco-tourism development. The synthesis also provides evidence-based answers to two key questions: (1) such integration yields measurable co-benefits across ecological, economic, and social dimensions; and (2) its success is contingent upon context-specific enabling conditions and inclusive, adaptive governance mechanisms. As global sustainability agendas continue to emphasize multifunctional landscapes, agroforestry-based eco-tourism presents a promising pathway for balancing conservation goals with rural development imperatives in palm oil-producing regions.

1. Okon EM, Falana BM, Solaja SO, Tokula BE, Kipchumba AK, Edeme AB. Systematic review of climate change impact research in Nigeria: implication for sustainable development. Heliyon. 2021; 7: e07941.
2. Ntawuruhunga D, Ngowi EE, Mangi HO, Salanga RJ, Shikuku KM. Climate-smart agroforestry systems and practices: A systematic review of what works, what doesn’t work, and why, For. Policy Econ. 2023; 150: 102937.
3. Tapia JFD, Doliente SS, Samsatli S. How much land is available for sustainable palm oil? Land use policy. 2021; 102: 105187.
4. Astuti R, Miller MA, McGregor A, Sukmara MDP, Saputra W, Taylor D. Making illegality visible: The governance dilemmas created by visualising illegal palm oil plantations in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Land use policy. 2022; 114.
5. Awazi NP, Singh K, Ribeiro MC, Calicioglu O, et al. Chapter 14-based bioeconomy transition in Cameroon: realities and the way forward, in Biodiversity and Bioeconomy Eds. Elsevier. 2024; 295-324.
6. BrandAo F, de Castro F, Futemma C. Between structural change and local agency in the palm oil sector: Interactions, heterogeneities and landscape transformations in the Brazilian Amazon. J. Rural Stud. 2019; 71: 156-168.
7. Shehu BG, Clarke ML. Successful and sustainable crop based biodiesel programme in Nigeria through ecological optimisation and intersectoral policy realignment. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020; 134: 110383.
8. Sun S, Wang Q, Wang X, Wu C, Zhang X, Bai J, et al. Dry torrefaction and continuous thermochemical conversion for upgrading agroforestry waste into eco-friendly energy carriers: Current progress and future prospect Sci. Total Environ. 2023; 905: 167061.
9. Awazi NP, Kimengsi JN, Balgah RA, Mairomi HW, Tume SJP, Tsufac AR. Chapter 15 - Bioeconomy transition for the attainment of Cameroon’s National Development Strategy (NDS30) goal of environmental and nature protection: assessing the all-encompassing contribution of agroforestry, in Biodiversity and Bioeconomy, Eds. Elsevier. 2024; 325-345.
10. Goh CS, Junginger M, Potter L, Faaij A, Wicke B. Identifying key factors for mobilising under-utilised low carbon land resources: A case study on Kalimantan, Land use policy. 2017; 70: 198-211.
11. Poncet V, van Asten P, Millet CP, Vaast P, Allinne C. Which diversification trajectories make coffee farming more sustainable? Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2024; 68: 101432.
12. Syahza A, Asmit B. Development of palm oil sector and future challenge in Riau Province Indonesia. J. Sci. Technol. Policy Manag. 2020; 11: 149-170.
13. Aryapratama R, Pauliuk S. Life cycle carbon emissions of different land conversion and woody biomass utilization scenarios in Indonesia, Sci. Total Environ. 2022; 805: 150226.
14. Jamnadass R, Langford K, Anjarwalla P, Mithöfer D. Public-Private Partnerships in Agroforestry in Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems. Ed. Oxford: Academic Press. 2014; 544-564.
15. Do Carmo Martinelli G, Schlindwein MM, Padovan MP, Vogel E, Ruviaro CF. Environmental performance of agroforestry systems in the Cerrado biome, Brazil. World Dev. 2019; 122: 339-348.
16. Da Paixao Alves Vet al. The cocoa bioeconomy in the eastern Amazon: An integrated analysis of production, environmental degradation perceptions and socioeconomic factors among farmers, Agric. Syst. 2025; 229: 104428.
17. Yin c, Zhao w, Pereira P.Ecosystem restoration along the ‘pattern-process-service-sustainability’ path for achieving land degradation neutrality, Landsc. Urban Plan. 2025; 253: 105227.
18. Kupsch D, Vendras E, Ocampo-Ariza C, Batáry P, Njie Motombi F, Bobo KS, et al. High critical forest habitat thresholds of native bird communities in Afrotropical agroforestry landscapes. Biol. Conserv. 2019; 230: 20-28.
19. Dewi S, Mulia R, Johana F, Ekadinata A, van Noordwijk M. Integrating relational and instrumental values of nature in planning land use for multiple ecosystem services (LUMENS): tools and process, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2023; 64: 101333.
20. Wang L, Garland GM, Ge T, Siddique KHM, Gan GY, Zhao M. Integrated strategies for enhancing agrifood productivity, lowering greenhouse gas emissions, and improving soil health. 2025; 101006.
21. Kurmi B, Nath AJ, Sileshi GW, Pandey R, Das AK. Impact of progressive and retrogressive land use changes on ecosystem multifunctionality: Implications for land restoration in the Indian Eastern Himalayan region. Sci. Total Environ. 2024; 912: 169197.
22. Ayompe LM, Nkongho RN, Acobta ANB, Tambasi EE, Masso C, Egoh BN. Review of Conceptual Frameworks for Smallholder Farmers to Achieve Sustainable Palm Oil Production. J. Clean. Prod. 2025; 145525.
23. Hassan SS, Williams GA, Jaiswal AK. Moving towards the second generation of lignocellulosic biorefineries in the EU: Drivers, challenges and opportunities, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019; 101: 590-599.
24. Lal R. Farming systems to return land for nature: It’s all about soil health and re-carbonization of the terrestrial biosphere, Farming Syst. 2023; 1: 100002.
25. Hendrawan D, Musshoff O. Risky for the income, useful for the environment: Predicting farmers’ intention to adopt oil palm agroforestry using an extended theory of planned behaviour. J. Clean. Prod. 2024; 475: 143692.
26. Braga DPP, Miccolis A, Ramos HMN, Cunha LF, de Sousa LVF, Marques HR. Implications of smallholder livelihoods for scaling oil palm agroforestry in Brazilian Eastern Amazon. World Dev. Sustain. 2024; 4: 100128.
27. Reich C, Musshoff O. Oil palm smallholders and the road to certification: Insights from Indonesia. J. Environ. Manage. 2025; 375: 124303.
28. Von Groß V, Sibhatu KT, Knohl A, Qaim M, Veldkamp E, Hölsche D, et al. Transformation scenarios towards multifunctional landscapes: A multi-criteria land-use allocation model applied to Jambi Province, Indonesia. J. Environ. Manage. 2024; 356: 120710.
29. Silalahi M, Nurrochmat DR, Harrison RD, Mansur I, Walsh TA, Habibi. Reconciling different interests in the Hutan Harapan rainforest ecosystem restoration management in Sumatra, Indonesia, Trees, and For People. 2025; 20: 100823.
30. Manpoong C, Tripathi SK, Aravindakshan S, Krupnik TJ. Digging in: Impact of land use changes on soil aggregation patterns and carbon stocks in the moist tropics of the Mizoram in the Indomalayan realm, Total Environ Adv. 2025; 13: 200119.
31. Grieco E, Vangi E, Chiti T, Collalti A. Impacts of deforestation and land use/land cover change on carbon stock dynamics in Jomoro District, Ghana. J. Environ. Manage. 2024; 367: 121993.
32. Narh J, Wehner S, Schmitt CB. Odum will take forever to grow’: The political ecology of agroforestry in Ghana Trees for People. 2025; 19: 100771.
33. Janzen S, Balzer J, Merk F, Eberle C, Chabi A, Walz Y. Moving towards a comprehensive evaluation of ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction: The example of agroforestry for flood risk reduction, Nature-Based Solut. 2024; 5: 100104.
34. Kurmi B, Nath AJ, Sileshi GW, Pandey R, Das AK. Land use change affects net ecosystem production in the Eastern Indian Himalayan region, Environ. Sustain. Indic. 2025; 26: 100670.
35. Koutika LS, et al. Enhancing ‘4 per 1000’ initiative implementation through region-specific agricultural and forestry practices. Soil Adv. 2025; 4: 100057.
36. Chowdhury P, Mahi NA, Yeassin R, Chowdhury NUR, Farrok O. Biomass to biofuel: Impacts and mitigation of environmental, health, and socioeconomic challenges, Energy Convers. Manag. X. 2025; 35: 100889.
37. Muhirwa F, Li L, Laspidou C. Global ecosystem sustainability indexing and patterns in the success of SDGs of water, energy and food security. J. Clean. Prod. 2025; 516: 145830.
38. Hossan MS, Afjal MI, Hasan MF, Hanif MA. Assessment of land dynamics transformation into tea plantations using support vector machine, Trees For People. 2024; 18: 100703.
39. Li W, Guo WY, Pasgaard M, Qin Y, Qiao H, Svenning JC. Unmanaged naturally regenerating forests approach intact forest canopy structure but are susceptible to climate and human stress. One Earth. 2024; 71068-1081.
40. Hairiah K, Burgers P, Farida AI, Kusumawati IA, Mardiani MO, Saputra DD, et al. Soil health indicators, farmer concepts and carbon market standards in agroforestation of underutilized lands in West Sumatra (Indonesia) Soil Adv. 2025; 3: 10051.
41. Ingram V, Janssen V, Neh VA, Pratihast AK. Cocoa driven deforestation in Cameroon: Practices and policy, For. Policy Econ. 2025; 177: 103533.
42. Solidario de Souza Benatti G, Buainain AM,  Cavalcante Filho PG, Vargas-Carpintero R, Asveld L, Osseweijer P. Macaw palm (Acrocomia spp.): An opportunity for including smallholders in Brazil’s biodiesel production, Clean. Circ. Bioeconomy. 2025; 10: 100134.
43. Kaam R, Tchamba M, Nfornkah BN, Djomo CC. Remote sensing, allometry,and carbon stocks of Phyllostachys aurea in the Western Highlands of Cameroon. Adv. Bamboo Sci. 2024; 6: 100055.
44. Zinngrebe Y, Berger J, Bunn C, Peer G, Schleyer C, Lakner S. Prioritizing partners and products for the sustainability of the EU’s agri-food trade One Earth. 2024; 7: 674-686.
45. Anokye J, Abunyewa AA, Jorgensen U, Kaba JS, Ampofo KT, Dawoe E, et al. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions through shade systems and climate-smart soil fertility interventions in cocoa landscapes in the Semi-deciduous ecological zone of Ghana. Soil Adv. 2024; 1: 100001.
46. Ayesu S, Agbyenyaga O, Barnes VR, Gyamfi A, Asante RK. Advancing multiple ecosystem service assessment in the tropics: Evidence from Barekese and Owabi watersheds in Ghana, Heliyon. 2024; 10: e37499.
47. Holle MJM, Apriyani V, Mumbunan S. Systematic evidence map of coffee agroecosystem management and biodiversity linkages in producing countries, clean. Circ. Bioeconomy. 2025; 11: 100147.
48. Koutika LS, Kone AW, Kaonga ML. Enhancing soil organic carbon storage to meet the objectives of ‘4 per 1000 initiative’ in Central and Western African ecosystems: A review. Soil Adv. 2025; 3: 100043.
49. Purnomo H, Puspitaloka D, Okarda B, Andrianto A, Qomar N, Sutikno S, et al. Community-based fire prevention and peatland restoration in Indonesia: A participatory action research approach. Environ Dev. 2024; 50: 100971.
50. Ulya NA, Nurlia A, Premono B, Waluyo EA, Yunardy S, Martin E. Understanding peat swamp forest transitions: sustainability strategies and livelihood adaptation in Ogan Komering Ilir Regency, South Sumatra, Indonesia Trees For People. 2025; 20: 100869.
51. Santoro S, Pagano A, Francesconi W, Mello D, Giordano R. Biodiversity-Climate-Society Nexus assessment through Participatory System Dynamics Model. The case study of Amazon forest-based value chain. Sci. Total Environ. 2025; 991: 179893.
52. Saadi Z, Alias NE, Yusop ZB, Chow MF, Muhammad MKI, Mazilamani LS, et al. Spatiotemporal assessment of rainfall and drought projection for integrated dam management in Benut River Basin, Malaysia under CMIP6 scenarios. Environ. Challenges. 2024; 15: 100892.
53. Mairomi J, Kimengsi N. Mapping actors’ interests and protected area management outcomes in the Campo Ma’an landscape of Cameroon for Policy Econ. 2025; 174: 103493.
54. Axelsson EP, Grady KC, Alloysius D, Falck J, Lussetti D, Vairappan CS, et al. Lessons learned from 25 years of operational large-scale restoration: The Sow-A-Seed project, Sabah, Borneo Ecol Eng. 2024; 206: 107282.
55. Rao HJ, Singh S, Singh N, Ramulu PJ, Santos TF, Santos CM, et al. Enhancing mechanical performance and water resistance of Careya-Banana fiber epoxy hybrid composites through PLA coating and alkali treatment. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2024; 32: 4304-4315.
56. Pant M, Palsule S. Synergistic effects of Areca and pineapple fiber reinforcements for sustainability of functionalized polypropylene hybrid composites. Ind. Crops Prod. 2025; 223: 120253.
57. Steinke J, Ivanova Y, Jones SK, Minh T, Sánchez A, Choy JS, et al. Digital sustainability tracing in smallholder context: Ex-ante insights from the Peruvian cocoa supply chain World Dev. Sustain. 2024; 5: 100185.
58. Macdonald K, Diprose R, Pugley DD. Scaling-up sustainable commodity governance through jurisdictional initiatives: Political pathways to sector transformation in the Indonesian palm oil sector? World Dev. 2024; 176: 106504.
59. Rahayu HP, Alim AHFS, Blok K, Nasu S, Mangkoesoebroto G. Recognizing social forestry’s role in bioenergy optimization through geospatial fuzzy-multicriteria analysis. Energy Sustain. 2024; 83: 101566.
60. Dembélé F, Guuroh RT, Ansah PB, Asare DCBM, Da SS, Aryee JNA, et al. Land use land cover change and intensity analysis of land transformation in and around a moist semi-deciduous forest in Ghana Trees for People. 2024; 15: 100507.
61. Arnould E, Helkkula A. Imagining post-marketing: Neo-animist resource circulation and value cocreation. J Bus Res. 2024; 176: 114590.
62. Chen Y, Feng X, Zhao X, Hao X, Tong L, Wang S, et al. Biochar application enhances soil quality by improving soil physical structure under particular water and salt conditions in arid region of Northwest China. J Integr Agric. 2024.
63. Ahirwal P, Sahoo J, Thangjam UK, Thong U. Oil palm agroforestry enhances crop yield and ecosystem carbon stock in northeast India: Implications for the United Nations sustainable development goals, Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2022; 30: 478-487.
64. Gomes MF, Oliveira RLLD, Costa LRDJ, Campos WVDS, Castellani DC, Kato OR, et al. Soil health indicators in oil palm agroforestry systems in the eastern Amazon Brazil. Geoderma Reg. 2024; 37: e00806.
65. Lusiana B, Slingerland M, Miccolis A, Khasanah NM, Leimona B, van Noordwijk M. Oil palm production, instrumental and relational values: the public relations battle for hearts, heads, and hands along the value chain, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2023; 64: 101321.
66. Cifuentes-Espinosa JA, Feintrenie L, Monzón-Alvarado C, Schmook B, Mesa-Jurado MA. Oil palm growers’ prospects for sustainable oil palm production. A case study from Campeche Mexico. Agric. Syst. 2023; 212: 103780.
67. Meijaard E, Azhar B, Persio M, Sheil B. Oil Palm Plantations in the Context of Biodiversity Conservation, in Encyclopedia of Biodiversity (Third Edition), Third Edit., SM. Scheiner, Ed. Oxford: Academic Press. 2024; 752-773.
68. Damiani S, Leite Montalvão MT, de Alcântara Mendes R, Gomes da Costa AC, Sousa Passos CJ. Water and sediment pesticide contamination on indigenous lands surrounded by oil palm plantations in the Brazilian Amazon. Heliyon. 2023; 9: e19920.
69. Mehraban N, Debela BL, Kalsum U, Qaim M. What about her? Oil palm cultivation and intra-household gender roles, Food Policy. 2022; 110: 102276.
70. Abubakar A, Gambo J, Ishak MY. Navigating climate challenges: Unraveling the effects of climate change on oil palm cultivation and adaptation strategies, in Advances in Food Security and Sustainability. Elsevier. 2023; 2023:  95-116.
71. Santika T, Wlson KA, Meijaard EM, Budiharta S, Law EE, Sabri M, et al. changing landscapes, livelihoods and village welfare in the context of oil palm development. Land use policy. 2019; 87: 104073.
72. Mardiatmoko G, Jhariya R, Meena MKS, Banerjee A, Kumar S, Raj A. Chapter 21 - Biomass-based agroforestry for sustainable land use planning and management, in Agroforestry for Carbon and Ecosystem Management Eds. Academic Press. 2024; 283-293.
73. Foong SY, Chan YH, Loy ACM, Tamothran AM, Yip AJK, Liew RK, et al. The nexus between biofuels and pesticides in agroforestry: Pathways toward United Nations sustainable development goals. Environ. Res. 2022; 214: 113751.
74. Calderón-Balcázar A, Cárdenas CD, Díaz-Vasco O, Fandiño E, Márquez T, Pizano C. Biomass and carbon stocks of four vegetation types in the Llanos Orientales of Colombia (Mapiripán, Meta), Trees For People. 2023; 12: 100380.
75. Nyarko H, Ashiagbor G. Can Ghana’s Cocoa Forest REDD+ program achieve its intended goals of promoting sustainable cocoa production and enhancing carbon stocks? J Environ Manage. 2025; 382: 125376.
76. Chowdhuri I, Pal SC. Challenges and potential pathways towards sustainable agriculture crop production: A systematic review to achieve sustainable development goals (SDGs) Soil Tillage Res. 2025; 248: 106442.
77. Willmott A, Willmott M, Grass I, Lusiana B, Cotter M. Harnessing the socio-ecological benefits of agroforestry diversification in social forestry with functional and phylogenetic tools. Environ Dev. 2023; 47: 100881.
78. Futemma C, De Castro F, Brondizio ES. Farmers and Social Innovations in Rural Development: Collaborative Arrangements in Eastern Brazilian Amazon Land use policy. 2020; 99: 104999.
79. Sillanpää M, Friess DA, Heatubun CD, Cragg SM, Alei F, Bhargava R, et al. Mangrove management practices, policies and impacts in New Guinea Biol. Conserv. 2024; 296: 110697.
80. Hairiah K, Noordwijk MVV, Sari RR, Saputra DD, Suprayogo D, Kurniawan S, et al. Soil carbon stocks in Indonesian (agro) forest transitions: Compaction conceals lower carbon concentrations in standard accounting Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2020; 294: 106879.
81. Van Noordwijk M, Duguma LA, Dewi S, Leimona B, Catacutan DC, Lusiana B, et al. SDG synergy between agriculture and forestry in the food, energy water and income nexus: reinventing agroforestry. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2018; 34: 33-42.