RCRA 2023 - Evaluating Happiness Courses and Modes of Delivery 2023

Hammersley CH

Published on: 2023-11-18

Abstract

Philosophers, theologians, and more recently, psychologists, have attempted to define happiness. A Google search using the term “happiness” lists 975,000,000 results. Happiness is a universal pursuit, with people from all over the world rating happiness more important than wealth and material goods [1]. In March of 2019, the 7th World Happiness Report was published. This report surveys the state of global happiness by ranking 156 countries based on how happy their citizens perceive their citizens to be [2]. According to HH, the 14th Dalai Lama, "the very purpose of our life is to seek happiness” [3]. He suggests that happiness can be achieved by ‘training the mind’ through methods that identify factors that lead to happiness and those factors that lead to suffering [3]. In 1997, Martin Seligman founded the relatively new field of positive psychology.

Keywords

Happiness; Modes of Delivery; Psychology

Introduction

A growing body of research shows that much of an individual’s happiness is under their control. An acceptable definition of happiness is "happiness is a state of well-being that encompasses living a good life, one with a sense of meaning and deep contentment” [1].

Rationale

An increasing amount of research reveals that happiness can improve physical health and that positivity and fulfilment may benefit cardiovascular health, the immune system, inflammation levels, and blood pressure. Happiness has also been linked to a longer lifespan as well as a higher quality of life and well-being. The agreement among many positive psychology, spirituality, and happiness researchers [3-7] that happiness can be taught was summed up by the Dalai Lama [3] when he stated, "Our moment to moment happiness is largely determined by our outlook” (p. 22). But can happiness be taught? Growing and diverse organizations and educational institutions have developed and applied happiness programs and courses. So now the question is, are the outcomes of happiness courses measureable?

Methods

Participants in this study were Northern Arizona University students enrolled in the PRM 205 Happiness courses (campus/in person (N = 896) and distance/online (N = 984)) from the spring 2015 to fall 2023 spring semesters. Participants enrolled in the course to satisfy an aesthetic and human inquiry liberal study requirement, satisfy a PRM major requirement, or satisfy a personal interest. This was a pre-experimental study using a pre-test and post-test design with a convenience sample. Northern Arizona University students enrolled in the PRM 205 Happiness courses (campus/in person (N = 896) and distance/online (N = 984) from spring 2015 to fall 2023 semesters completed a pre- and post-online Fordyce Emotions Questionnaire [8]. The Fordyce Emotions Questionnaire is a brief measure of current happiness, and research supports that it is a valid measure of emotional well-being and global health [9]. A t-test paired with two samples for means was employed, taking each student’s pre- and post-survey scores. A separate t-test was applied to the scores for the campus/in person and distance/online courses to determine if any change in the students happiness scores had occurred between the beginning and the end of the course. The t-test analysis reduces the chance that a confounding variable will influence the results. A third t-test: Two Sample Assuming Unequal Variances was used to compare the differences in student pre-survey and post-survey scores between the campuses/in person or distance/Internet delivery mode. An alpha of 0.05 was used as the cut-off for significance. If the p-value is less than 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that a significant difference does exist.

Results

The results of this study conclude that happiness can be taught, as measured by the Fordyce Emotions Questionnaire, and that the course can be delivered on campus/in person or distance/Internet with equally positive results.

Table 1 shows the campus courses t-Test Paired Two Samples for Means. The results show the difference between Pre and Post scores was positive (t Stat= -23.751, df - 893, t Critical two-tail 1.9626). The t Stat -23.7510 was greater than the t Critical two-tail 1.9626. The course resulted in a significant increase in student happiness.

Table 2 shows the distance course t-Test Paired Two Samples for Means. The results show the difference between Pre and Post scores was positive (t Stat = -25.966, df = 981, t Critical two-tail 1.9623). The t Stat -25.966 was greater than the t Critical two-tail 1.9623.). The course resulted in a significant increase in student happiness.

Table 3 shows the Campus vs Distance Course Delivery t-Test: Two Sample Assuming Unequal Variances. The results show t Stat = 0.5184, df = 1845, t Critical two-tail = 1.9612 the null was accepted. This indicates there were no statistically significant differences increasing student happiness between the campus/in person and distance/online delivery modes.

Application to Practice

A variety of studies have found that happy people live longer, are creative, tolerant, constructive, generous, undefensive, and playful. Happy people have higher job satisfaction, better health habits, lower blood pressure, endure pain better, have a stronger immune system, and are less likely to become disabled. They have more casual [4]. One explanation for the growing interest in positive psychology and happiness may be the increasing rates of depression in the United States. “Rates of depression are ten times higher today than they were in the 1960’s, and the average age for onset of depression is fourteen and a half compared to twenty-nine and a half in 1960” [10]. In our high-tech, high-speed, consumer-driven society, individuals are reaching out to find purpose and meaning in their lives. Happiness is not just about moments of joy, flow, pleasure, contentment, hope, or ecstasy, which are fleeting and inconsistent emotions. The nature of happiness is that its pursuit is an ongoing process on an infinite continuum and not a final destination. Teaching happiness in our educational institutions and communities will assist individuals in creating a purposeful and meaningful life.

The impetus for teaching “happiness” is best summed up by the Dalai Lama [3] when he said, “Cultivating greater happiness benefits not only oneself but also one’s family, community, and society” (p. xxiii).

Table 1: Campus Pre-Post.

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

 

Variable 1

Variable 2

Mean

51.859977

65.131855

Variance

452.48037

396.97208

Observations

857

857

Pearson Correlation

0.6741718

 

Hypothesized Mean Difference

0

 

df

856

 

t Stat

-23.302404

 

P(T<=t) one-tail

1.07E-93

 

t Critical one-tail

1.6466357

 

P(T<=t) two-tail

2.13E-93

 

t Critical two-tail

1.9627392

 

Table 2: Distance Pre-Post.

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

 

Variable 1

Variable 2

Mean

52.3506891

66.3652374

Variance

486.704509

404.104814

Observations

1306

1306

Pearson Correlation

0.69963449

 

Hypothesized Mean Difference

0

 

df

1305

 

t Stat

-30.808112

 

P(T<=t) one-tail

2.22E-157

 

t Critical one-tail

1.6460221

 

P(T<=t) two-tail

4.44E-157

 

t Critical two-tail

1.96178348

 

Table 3: Campus vs Distance.

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances

 

Variable 1

Variable 2

Mean

18.2930355

18.2540913

Variance

175.920596

190.769003

Observations

761

1161

Hypothesized Mean Difference

0

 

df

1671

 

t Stat

0.06192667

 

P(T<=t) one-tail

0.47531432

 

t Critical one-tail

1.64576603

 

P(T<=t) two-tail

0.95062864

 

t Critical two-tail

1.96138467

 

References