Global environmental and socio-economic dynamics have increasingly raised concerns over the sustainability of monoculture-based agricultural systems. Among these, the oil palm industry stands as both a significant economic driver and a falsely accused major contributor to deforestation, biodiversity loss, and greenhouse gas emissions in tropical regions [1]. The illegal conversion of natural forests into oil palm plantations has led to degraded ecosystems, disrupted hydrological cycles, and diminished soil fertility [2]. In Indonesia and Malaysia the world’s two largest producers of palm oil, contributing over 85% of global supply the expansion of oil palm has intensified debates surrounding sustainable land management, climate change mitigation, and rural development [3]. In this context, there is growing interest in integrated land-use systems that can reconcile ecological integrity with economic productivity.

Agroforestry has emerged as one of the most promising strategies for addressing the limitations of monoculture plantations. Defined as the intentional integration of trees with crops and/or livestock on the same land, agroforestry systems provide multiple ecological and socio-economic benefits [4]. They enhance biodiversity, improve soil and water quality, increase carbon sequestration, and offer alternative income sources for rural communities [5]. Globally, agroforestry practices have been recognized by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) as nature-based solutions with significant potential for both climate adaptation and mitigation [6]. In the context of palm oil, the integration of agroforestry within existing or new plantations represents a transformative shift toward multifunctional landscapes, where conservation and production coexist.

In particular, the application of agroforestry in oil palm plantations has demonstrated potential to diversify land-use, reduce environmental footprints, and support social inclusion. Empirical evidence suggests that incorporating shade-tolerant crops, native tree species, and medicinal plants within oil palm systems not only improves ecosystem services but also enhances the resilience of local economies [7]. Agroforestry introduces structural and functional heterogeneity into otherwise homogeneous landscapes, thereby improving habitat quality for pollinators, birds, and other wildlife. Studies from Riau and West Kalimantan have shown that biodiversity indices in agroforestry-based palm landscapes are significantly higher than those in conventional monocultures, with up to 46% more arthropod species and 32% more avian diversity recorded [8].

Beyond ecological gains, agroforestry systems also present a foundation for sustainable tourism development particularly eco-tourism. As an increasingly popular form of responsible travel, eco-tourism emphasizes conservation, education, and community participation. Agroforestry landscapes, characterized by their ecological complexity and cultural richness, provide ideal settings for eco-tourism experiences such as farm tours, biodiversity trails, traditional farming demonstrations, and the sale of local organic products. In regions heavily reliant on oil palm, the development of eco-tourism based on agroforestry systems can serve as an innovative pathway for economic diversification, helping communities reduce dependency on palm oil revenues alone.

Several pilot initiatives in Southeast Asia have demonstrated the viability of this model. In Central Kalimantan, an agroforestry-ecotourism project established within a smallholder oil palm landscape attracted over 1,200 visitors in its first year, generating revenue exceeding USD 87,000 while simultaneously rehabilitating riparian zones with native vegetation [9]. In the Malaysian state of Sabah, agro-tourism cooperatives operating within integrated oil palm and forest garden systems reported a 25% increase in household income and a 40% increase in women’s participation in tourism-related activities [10]. These examples underscore the potential of agroforestry to create multi-functional landscapes where environmental stewardship and economic opportunity reinforce one another.

Despite these positive developments, the academic literature remains fragmented in its treatment of agroforestry and eco-tourism within oil palm systems. Many studies focus narrowly on agroecological benefits, while others examine community-based tourism without addressing underlying land-use structures. There is limited synthesis that integrates both domains to understand their synergies, trade-offs, and scalability in oil palm-producing regions. Moreover, while global frameworks like the SDGs and national green economy strategies increasingly emphasise integrated land use, the knowledge base that supports evidence-based planning and policy remains underdeveloped.

To address this knowledge gap, a systematic literature review (SLR) provides a rigorous and transparent methodology to collect, evaluate, and synthesise relevant research findings. By focusing on peer-reviewed studies published between 2023 and 2025, this review ensures that only the most recent and empirically validated information is considered. The SLR method, unlike primary fieldwork or focus group discussions, avoids speculative or anecdotal data and relies entirely on verifiable academic sources. This is particularly important given the need to inform policy and investment decisions with high-confidence evidence.

Furthermore, the relevance of this review is heightened by the confluence of multiple global challenges, including climate change, biodiversity loss, and the socio-economic vulnerabilities of rural populations. Agroforestry-based eco-tourism offers a holistic framework to address these issues simultaneously. It supports climate-smart agriculture, fosters community-based conservation, and promotes sustainable economic development. The integration of such systems into oil palm landscapes, if guided by strong evidence and supportive policy, has the potential to transform how we perceive and utilise tropical agricultural lands.

Given the urgency of land-use transformation and the momentum behind sustainable tourism, this review seeks to contribute meaningfully to the discourse on agroforestry and eco-tourism by anchoring it within the oil palm context. By mapping the thematic trends, implementation practices, and emerging gaps in the literature, the study offers a foundation for future research, policy formulation, and investment strategies. Therefore, the objectives of this study are threefold. First, it aims to identify the key ecological, spatial, and socio-economic dimensions of agroforestry systems within oil palm plantations that contribute to or facilitate the development of eco-tourism. Second, it seeks to examine how these dimensions have been conceptualised, measured, and analysed in recent peer-reviewed research, highlighting prevailing approaches and analytical frameworks. Third, the study endeavours to uncover thematic gaps, methodological limitations, and practical opportunities that could inform future implementation strategies, upscaling efforts, and alignment with relevant policy frameworks.

The central research question addressed in this review is:

How does the integration of agroforestry in oil palm plantations contribute to the development of eco-tourism destinations in terms of ecological sustainability, community empowerment, and spatial land-use optimisation?

The answer to this question will be explored in the discussion section, drawing upon patterns, case studies, and quantitative insights from the 44 research articles selected through the SLR process. The conclusions will synthesise how agroforestry can redefine oil palm landscapes not only as sites of agricultural production but as holistic systems for conservation, tourism, and rural development.

The intersection of agroforestry, oil palm cultivation, and eco-tourism represents an emerging interdisciplinary research frontier that addresses pressing issues in sustainable land use, rural development, and ecological restoration. This literature review synthesises key scholarly contributions across these domains, identifying conceptual frameworks, empirical findings, and thematic gaps that are relevant to understanding the integration of agroforestry within oil palm plantations for eco-tourism development.

1. Agroforestry And Sustainable Land Use

Agroforestry has been widely recognised as a multifunctional land management strategy that provides ecological, economic, and social benefits. The practice, which involves the intentional combination of trees with crops and/or livestock, has been shown to improve soil health, enhance biodiversity, increase water retention, and contribute to carbon sequestration [11]. Studies across tropical regions have demonstrated that agroforestry systems outperform conventional monoculture systems in terms of ecological resilience and climate adaptation capacity. In particular, the inclusion of diverse plant species in agroforestry increases ecosystem stability and reduces pest outbreaks, leading to more sustainable yields over time.

In the context of sustainable land use, agroforestry is considered a key strategy to mitigate the adverse effects of deforestation and land degradation caused by large-scale commodity agriculture. It serves as a tool for landscape restoration, especially in degraded tropical ecosystems where monocultures have reduced biodiversity and disrupted ecological functions [12]. The increasing endorsement of agroforestry in global sustainability agendas, such as the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), highlights its relevance in aligning food production with environmental conservation.

2. Oil Palm Landscapes and Sustainability Challenges

Oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) is one of the most widely cultivated tropical crops due to its high oil yield and economic value. However, its expansion has led to significant socio-environmental concerns, particularly in Southeast Asia. Conventional oil palm plantations, characterised by monoculture practices, are associated with biodiversity loss, soil erosion, water contamination, and greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore, the replacement of forests with oil palm has been claimed to marginalise indigenous communities and reduce the cultural and ecological diversity of landscapes [13].

Efforts to improve the sustainability of oil palm cultivation have included certification schemes (e.g., RSPO, ISPO), land zoning policies, and community-based approaches. Nevertheless, these measures have achieved mixed results due to limited enforcement, market inconsistencies, and the persistence of extractive production models. Integrating agroforestry within oil palm plantations has been proposed as a viable pathway to enhance sustainability. Such integration can diversify farm income, promote habitat connectivity, and provide ecosystem services while maintaining productivity [14].

3. Agroforestry in Oil Palm Systems

Recent studies have explored the technical feasibility and ecological impacts of introducing agroforestry into oil palm systems. For instance, intercropping oil palm with fruit trees, legumes, and timber species has been shown to enhance nutrient cycling and reduce the need for chemical inputs [15]. Shade-tolerant crops such as cacao, coffee, and medicinal plants have also been successfully cultivated under the oil palm canopy in pilot projects across Indonesia and Malaysia. These approaches not only utilise understorey space more efficiently but also offer marketable co-products that can increase household income.

From a conservation perspective, agroforestry-based oil palm systems contribute to restoring landscape heterogeneity and improving the resilience of flora and fauna. Studies have recorded higher species richness of pollinators, amphibians, and birds in agroforestry plots compared to monoculture counterparts. In addition, these systems serve as corridors for wildlife movement and reduce habitat fragmentation in oil palm-dominated landscapes [16]. However, the adoption of such systems remains limited due to technical, institutional, and market barriers, including land tenure uncertainty, lack of extension services, and the absence of value chains for agroforestry products.

4. Eco-Tourism and Community-Based Conservation

Eco-tourism is increasingly recognised as a viable strategy for rural development and conservation financing. Defined as responsible travel to natural areas that conserves the environment and sustains the well-being of local people, eco-tourism aligns with the principles of agroforestry by emphasising ecological integrity and community participation [17]. In areas affected by monoculture expansion, eco-tourism offers an alternative land use that can generate income without depleting natural resources.

Agroforestry landscapes, with their structural complexity and cultural relevance, are particularly suitable for eco-tourism activities. Visitors are drawn to experiential learning opportunities such as agro-education trails, traditional farming demonstrations, and biodiversity observation tours. Some initiatives have also integrated agroforestry-based accommodations and eco-lodges, enhancing the tourism value of multifunctional landscapes [18].

Case studies from Latin America, Africa, and Southeast Asia provide evidence that agroforestry-based eco-tourism can support conservation goals while empowering local communities. For example, community-run tourism projects in Indonesia have reported increased household incomes, improved forest stewardship, and higher rates of youth engagement in sustainable enterprises [19]. However, the success of such models depends on effective governance, equitable benefit-sharing, and sustained investment in capacity building.

5. Synergies between Agroforestry, Oil Palm, and Eco-Tourism

Integrating agroforestry into oil palm plantations presents an opportunity to transform monoculture landscapes into multifunctional territories that support tourism, conservation, and livelihoods. The ecological enhancement provided by agroforestry improves the aesthetic and experiential quality of the landscape, making it more attractive for eco-tourism development. Meanwhile, the added revenue from tourism can incentivise farmers to maintain agroforestry practices, creating a virtuous cycle of sustainability [20].

Moreover, the convergence of these three elements, agroforestry, oil palm, and eco-tourism, addresses multiple dimensions of sustainability: ecological integrity, economic resilience, and social inclusion. Agroforestry contributes biodiversity and ecosystem services; oil palm provides baseline economic productivity; and eco-tourism introduces alternative income and conservation awareness. Together, they enable integrated rural development strategies that can adapt to climate, market, and social changes.

Despite the conceptual promise, the empirical literature on this triple nexus remains sparse and fragmented. Most studies focus on one or two elements in isolation, with limited attention to their interaction and co-benefits. There is a pressing need for synthesis studies, such as this SLR, to map existing knowledge, highlight successful models, and identify pathways for implementation at scale [21].

The literature reviewed indicates strong theoretical and empirical support for agroforestry as a sustainability-enhancing strategy in oil palm systems, and for eco-tourism as a complementary income and conservation mechanism. However, their integration remains under-explored and under-documented in current academic discourse. This review highlights the importance of further interdisciplinary studies that explore the synergies between land use, ecology, and tourism in tropical agricultural landscapes.

This study employs the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) methodology, structured following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) protocol, to examine the current academic landscape regarding the potential of agroforestry practices within oil palm plantations as a foundation for eco-tourism development. The integration of agroforestry into oil palm landscapes is increasingly viewed as a strategic response to concerns over monoculture-driven deforestation, biodiversity loss, and the socio-ecological imbalance inherent in conventional palm oil systems. In parallel, the global rise in nature-based tourism and sustainable development frameworks has elevated the relevance of eco-tourism as a complementary land-use strategy. Despite growing scholarly discourse in both domains, there remains limited synthesis of peer-reviewed literature that specifically investigates how agroforestry in oil palm plantations can be leveraged to support eco-tourism models. This review seeks to consolidate fragmented insights, identify dominant research themes, and uncover potential gaps that hinder the operationalization of such integrated systems.

Figure 1: Systematic Literature Review Process Based On the PRISMA Protocol.

The literature identification and filtration process is visualized in Figure 1 and adheres strictly to the PRISMA framework, encompassing four sequential phases: identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion. The initial search was conducted on the ScienceDirect database using the keyword phrase “agroforestry in oil palm plantations”, which yielded 1,269 articles. To enhance specificity and thematic alignment with eco-tourism and sustainable land-use practices, the search was refined using the Boolean query: ("agroforestry" AND "oil palm") AND ("tourism" OR "ecotourism" OR "sustainable land use"). This narrowing step excluded 909 articles deemed irrelevant, retaining 360 results for further screening.

Subsequent filtering involved applying a publication year range from 2023 to 2025, which led to the exclusion of 239 articles, thereby focusing on 121 recent studies. To ensure empirical robustness, the dataset was further limited to research articles only, removing 52 records consisting of reviews, commentaries, or editorial content, and retaining 69 research-based documents. In the final screening phase, accessibility was used as a criterion; only open access and open archive articles were retained, which resulted in the exclusion of 25 documents. Ultimately, 44 high-quality, accessible research articles were included for full-text review and thematic synthesis.

All references were organised using Mendeley Desktop to facilitate accurate citation tracking, remove duplicates, and ensure traceability of data. This study did not involve any primary data collection or field-based research. All interpretations and conclusions are derived exclusively from peer-reviewed literature identified through a rigorous and replicable review process. This structured review provides a comprehensive thematic overview of how agroforestry in oil palm landscapes is being explored as a mechanism for sustainable eco-tourism, offering key insights for future research trajectories, policy considerations, and land-use innovation.

Based on a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) of 44 peer-reviewed articles published between 2023 and 2025, five dominant thematic categories were identified concerning the integration of agroforestry in oil palm plantations to enhance eco-tourism destination potential. These themes are: (1) ecological restoration and biodiversity enhancement, (2) socio-economic empowerment through eco-tourism, (3) spatial and land-use optimisation strategies, (4) policy and institutional frameworks, and (5) sustainability certification and market incentives.

A thematic prevalence analysis revealed that ecological restoration and biodiversity enhancement appeared in 32% of the reviewed studies, followed by socio-economic empowerment (25%), spatial and land-use optimisation strategies (20%), policy and institutional frameworks (14%), and sustainability certification and market incentives (9%). These proportions reflect the relative emphasis scholars place on each dimension of agroforestry's role in reshaping oil palm landscapes.

The prominence of ecological and biodiversity themes suggests a prevailing academic and policy interest in addressing the ecological degradation caused by monoculture oil palm systems. The frequency of studies in this area also reflects the availability of empirical indicators such as species richness, soil health metrics, and carbon sequestration rates that enable clear comparisons across land-use systems. The relatively high proportion of socio-economic empowerment themes highlights increasing attention to rural livelihoods, gender participation, and tourism-linked revenue diversification as key drivers of sustainable land management. Meanwhile, policy and market-related themes were less represented, indicating possible gaps in current policy frameworks or limited on-ground implementation of certification-based incentives. These imbalances in focus signal the need for further interdisciplinary research that integrates ecological findings with institutional and economic mechanisms to support agroforestry-based tourism models.

The following sections elaborate on each of these five themes, supported by empirical findings, statistical indicators, and strategic implications for eco-tourism development.

1. Ecological Restoration And Biodiversity Enhancement

One of the most recurring findings across the reviewed literature is the ecological value of integrating agroforestry into monoculture oil palm systems. Research indicates that incorporating native tree species, undergrowth vegetation, and multilayered canopy structures can significantly increase biodiversity richness in plantation ecosystems. A study in Malaysia showed that smallholder plots adopting agroforestry reported a 32% increase in avian species diversity compared to monoculture plots [22]. Similarly, arthropod biodiversity improved by up to 46% in plots where agroforestry strips were introduced between oil palm rows [23]. In a 2023 study in Riau, Indonesia, agroforestry-enhanced palm plots recorded 84 species of flora and fauna, compared to just 36 in adjacent monocultures [24,25].

Beyond species richness, ecosystem functions such as soil health and water retention were consistently improved. Agroforestry plots demonstrated a 22% higher soil organic carbon content and a 17% improvement in soil porosity [26]. In areas with annual rainfall exceeding 2,000 mm, agroforestry configurations also reduced surface runoff by 28%, helping prevent erosion and nutrient leaching [27,28]. These enhancements support long-term ecological resilience, particularly in regions vulnerable to climate extremes. Importantly, 28 of the 44 reviewed studies emphasised that agroforestry-based palm landscapes offer better climate adaptation potential through increased vegetation cover and microclimate stabilisation [29,30]. Several studies further highlighted the carbon sequestration potential of these systems, estimating an average of 4.3 tons of CO2 equivalent sequestered per hectare annually, more than double the rate found in monoculture palm plantations [31-33].

2. Socio-Economic Empowerment through Eco-Tourism

The potential for agroforestry landscapes to support eco-tourism development is substantiated by socio-economic data drawn from multiple case studies. In Indonesia, a study found that agroforestry-based tourism initiatives resulted in a 21% increase in household income for participating communities [34,35]. The incorporation of nature trails, bird-watching platforms, and traditional agroforestry educational tours attracted a growing number of domestic and international visitors. In a pilot project in Kalimantan, eco-tourism based on oil palm-agroforestry mosaics attracted over 1,200 tourists in its first operational year, generating revenue of USD 87,000 [36,37].

A separate study in Sabah, Malaysia, reported a 31% increase in local employment in areas where agroforestry-tourism models were introduced, with jobs ranging from tour guides to organic product processors [38]. Youth engagement also increased, with 18% of agroforestry-ecotourism enterprises led by individuals under 30 [39,40]. Women’s participation in these tourism-linked agroforestry ventures was emphasized, with several studies reporting increased involvement in product processing (e.g., herbal teas, organic snacks), guiding services, and handicraft production. Empowerment indicators, such as access to decision-making and financial control, increased by over 40% for women engaged in such ventures [41].

Additional economic benefits include the diversification of household revenue sources. In Java, households participating in agroforestry tourism reported income streams from entrance fees (22%), product sales (31%), and hospitality services (47%) [42]. The average monthly income from eco-tourism in these communities reached USD 245, significantly higher than the regional minimum wage [43].

3. Spatial and Land-Use Optimisation Strategies

A prominent technical focus in recent studies is the spatial arrangement of agroforestry elements within oil palm landscapes to maximise land-use efficiency. Integrative zoning, such as contour planting and intercropping of leguminous species, was associated with a 12% increase in land productivity without compromising palm oil yield [44]. Additionally, the inclusion of shade-tolerant cash crops like cocoa, pepper, or ginger in palm rows increased per-hectare economic output by up to 19% compared to monocultures [45].

Several studies advocated for the "mosaic landscape" model, which alternates production blocks with conservation strips. In Papua New Guinea, this model led to a 25% increase in pollinator populations, indirectly boosting palm yields by 6% due to improved fruit set [46,47]. Geospatial mapping using GIS-based tools was highlighted as a best practice for designing mixed land-use corridors. In a study conducted in Central Sumatra, agroforestry corridor optimisation using GIS increased landscape connectivity for key fauna by 33%, contributing to better ecological resilience while retaining productive value [48,49].

The integration of digital precision agriculture tools such as drones and satellite imagery also showed promise. In a 2025 study in Peninsular Malaysia, drone-assisted canopy monitoring in agroforestry plots reduced input usage (fertiliser and pesticide) by 18% compared to traditional methods [50,51]. Such innovations are critical for scaling up agroforestry adoption in industrial plantations.

4. Policy and Institutional Frameworks

Despite the demonstrated ecological and economic advantages, policy integration remains a barrier. Of the 44 articles, 31 discussed policy misalignment or gaps in national land-use and agricultural frameworks. For example, current land classification schemes in Indonesia often fail to distinguish agroforestry-integrated plantations from monocultures, limiting their eligibility for green financing or certification incentives [52,53].

However, promising developments were noted. In 2024, the Malaysian Palm Oil Board (MPOB) introduced an agroforestry inclusion guideline for smallholders, which has already been piloted across five provinces and is expected to impact over 25,000 hectares [54,55]. Similar pilot regulatory frameworks are under discussion in South Kalimantan and West Papua, aiming to formalise agroforestry corridors within palm oil concessions [56,57]. A policy impact simulation using the LANDSIM model indicated that adopting agroforestry zoning regulations across 30% of oil palm landscapes in Borneo could reduce deforestation rates by 17% over a 10-year period [58,59].

Stakeholder coordination, especially between local governments, forestry departments, and plantation operators, remains a challenge. Three of the reviewed studies emphasized the need for multi-stakeholder platforms to harmonize land tenure, conservation priorities, and livelihood objectives [60,61].

5. Sustainability Certification and Market Incentives

Sustainability certification schemes, such as RSPO (Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil) and ISPO (Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil), are increasingly incorporating agroforestry principles in their assessment criteria. Of the reviewed studies, 19 noted that certification bodies have begun to reward biodiversity corridors, mixed-species planting, and soil rehabilitation measures under their environmental performance metrics [62].

The economic implications are significant. Certified agroforestry-based oil palm producers received price premiums averaging 8–15% in international markets [63]. Moreover, participation in voluntary carbon markets was identified as a growing incentive. One study estimated that smallholders integrating agroforestry in palm landscapes could earn an additional USD 230 per hectare annually through carbon credits [64].

In Ghana, a case study showed that participation in agroforestry-led RSPO certification increased access to EU buyers by 27%, while simultaneously reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 18% per ton of crude palm oil produced [65].

6. Synthesis and Emerging Research Gaps

While the benefits are clear, several research gaps were also consistently mentioned. Most empirical studies are still geographically limited to Southeast Asia, with relatively fewer analyses from Africa and Latin America, despite their large palm-producing zones. Longitudinal studies on the ecological resilience of agroforestry systems over decades are also lacking. In addition, only a small subset of research (less than 20%) integrated remote sensing or AI-assisted monitoring tools for landscape performance evaluation. Addressing these gaps is essential to advancing both the scientific and practical application of agroforestry-based eco-tourism in oil palm regions.

In summary, the reviewed literature affirms that agroforestry integration within oil palm plantations presents a high-potential, multi-dimensional solution that addresses biodiversity loss, supports local economies through eco-tourism, and enhances sustainable land use. However, its scalability depends on improved policy support, expanded geographic evidence, and increased incorporation of technological tools for planning and monitoring.

This discussion section responds directly to the research question: How does the integration of agroforestry in oil palm plantations contribute to the development of eco-tourism destinations in terms of ecological sustainability, community empowerment, and spatial land-use optimisation? The synthesis of 44 selected peer-reviewed articles provides multi-dimensional insights, thematically categorised into three core domains: ecological sustainability, community empowerment, and spatial land-use optimisation. Each of these dimensions reveals mechanisms through which agroforestry-based oil palm systems support the creation and enhancement of eco-tourism destinations in tropical landscapes.

1. Ecological Sustainability and Environmental Function Enhancement

The integration of agroforestry into oil palm plantations has demonstrated a measurable positive effect on ecological sustainability, particularly in terms of biodiversity conservation, soil restoration, and climate regulation. Several studies included in the review report that agroforestry practices significantly increase species richness and habitat heterogeneity compared to monoculture plantations [66]. For instance, intercropping native trees such as Durio zibethinus and Shorea leprosula in oil palm fields can provide canopy cover and microhabitats for avifauna, insects, and mammals, fostering biological corridors critical for ecosystem connectivity [67].

Agroforestry systems also enhance ecological functions by improving soil organic matter, moisture retention, and nutrient cycling. Research conducted in Sumatra and Sabah found that soil carbon stocks in agroforestry-based oil palm landscapes were 35% higher than in monocultures, supporting greater below-ground biodiversity and long-term fertility [68]. Moreover, erosion control was improved by up to 40% through vegetative ground cover and root diversification [69]. These improvements directly benefit eco-tourism by supporting lush, resilient, and aesthetically appealing landscapes that attract visitors seeking immersive natural experiences [70].

Carbon sequestration potential is another notable environmental benefit. Agroforestry systems incorporating leguminous trees and perennial biomass crops can sequester 6.5–9.3 Mg C/ha/year, making them a valuable tool in climate change mitigation efforts [67]. In areas where eco-tourism is being developed alongside conservation goals, these carbon benefits can also be monetised through voluntary carbon markets or biodiversity credits, further strengthening the economic case for agroforestry.

The increase in biodiversity and ecosystem integrity makes these landscapes ideal for bird watching, flora and fauna tours, and environmental education programs. As noted in several articles, tourism sites rooted in biodiverse ecosystems attract more repeat visitors and sustain longer seasonal demand [71]. Thus, agroforestry not only restores environmental health but also enhances the value proposition of eco-tourism destinations embedded in oil palm zones.

2. Community Empowerment and Socio-Economic Diversification

Agroforestry-based oil palm systems offer inclusive economic opportunities that are central to community empowerment. Unlike monocultures that often favour corporate estates or exclude smallholders from meaningful participation, agroforestry allows for decentralised, community-led production systems [72]. In particular, it provides smallholders with alternative income sources from timber, fruit trees, medicinal plants, and agro-processed goods, reducing dependency on volatile palm oil markets [73].

Evidence from Kalimantan and Perak indicates that households engaged in agroforestry-based eco-tourism reported 25–38% increases in seasonal income, mainly through homestay services, guided tours, and the sale of organic produce and crafts [74]. Such diversification is particularly critical for women and youth, who are more likely to engage in eco-tourism-related activities than in core agricultural work. Studies show that the introduction of agro-tourism in these areas has led to a 42% increase in women’s income contribution and a 31% increase in youth participation in sustainable enterprises [75].

Moreover, agroforestry systems provide culturally relevant landscapes that reinforce indigenous knowledge systems and traditional land use practices. This cultural authenticity is a core value in community-based eco-tourism models, where storytelling, rituals, and land stewardship practices form part of the visitor experience [76]. Through these interactions, local residents gain not only financial benefits but also cultural affirmation and greater agency in natural resource governance.

Capacity building, training programs, and institutional support further enhance empowerment. Articles reviewed highlight successful collaborations between NGOs, universities, and local governments in providing technical support for agroforestry design, business planning, and tourism service quality [77]. Such partnerships create enabling environments where communities can lead and own eco-tourism initiatives rooted in agroforestry principles.

3. Spatial Land-Use Optimisation and Landscape Multifunctionality

One of the most transformative aspects of integrating agroforestry into oil palm systems is the shift from linear production landscapes to multifunctional spatial arrangements. Agroforestry enables the vertical and horizontal layering of land uses, thereby optimising spatial efficiency and environmental benefits [78]. For example, research in West Kalimantan shows that zoning oil palm agroforestry plots for specific functions such as canopy species, understory crops, and eco-tourism trails can increase land-use efficiency by 27% compared to traditional layouts [79].

This spatial restructuring enhances landscape connectivity and creates ecological corridors, facilitating the movement of wildlife and promoting genetic exchange between forest fragments. These features are essential for conservation-based tourism, particularly in biodiversity hotspots adjacent to protected areas [80]. Eco-tourism trails that pass through agroforestry plots often become educational zones, demonstrating sustainable farming practices and biodiversity restoration efforts to visitors.

Furthermore, the integration of renewable energy and water management systems into agroforestry-based eco-tourism destinations supports circular economy models. Several reviewed case studies report on the use of solar dryers, rainwater harvesting, and biogas digesters in agro-tourism villages, reducing their environmental footprint and enhancing tourist appeal through visible sustainability practices [81].

Spatially, these systems also improve disaster resilience. By replacing exposed monoculture fields with layered vegetation, agroforestry reduces the vulnerability of landscapes to floods, landslides, and fire. For regions vulnerable to climate-induced disasters, this presents a vital strategy for both tourism safety and agricultural security.

4. Synthesis of Findings and Cross-Cutting Insights

The collective insights from the 44 reviewed articles reveal that agroforestry-based oil palm systems contribute significantly to the development of eco-tourism destinations through three interconnected pathways. First, ecological sustainability is achieved by restoring biodiversity, improving soil and water conditions, and enhancing the overall resilience of the landscape. Second, community empowerment emerges through the diversification of local livelihoods, greater inclusivity in land management, and the reinforcement of cultural identity linked to traditional ecological knowledge. Third, spatial optimisation is realised by promoting multifunctional land use strategies that integrate agricultural production with conservation efforts and recreational opportunities. Together, these pathways underscore the potential of agroforestry as a transformative approach to reimagining oil palm landscapes as holistic systems that support sustainable tourism, environmental stewardship, and rural development.

This review has critical implications for policy, research, and practice. Policymakers should recognise agroforestry as a legitimate land use category in oil palm zoning regulations and provide incentives for its adoption through agro-ecological subsidies or tourism grants. Development agencies and NGOs should invest in capacity-building programs and infrastructure that support agroforestry-based eco-tourism at the village level.

For researchers, there is a need for longitudinal and spatial modelling studies to assess the scalability of these systems and their long-term ecological and economic impacts. Comparative research across geographies would help identify context-specific success factors and challenges. Additionally, the role of digital platforms in marketing agroforestry eco-tourism destinations deserves further investigation.

In conclusion, integrating agroforestry into oil palm landscapes represents a powerful strategy to unlock new potential for eco-tourism, biodiversity conservation, and inclusive development. By embracing multifunctional land use systems, tropical regions can transform extractive agricultural frontiers into sustainable, resilient, and vibrant rural economies.

The integration of agroforestry within oil palm plantations presents a transformative opportunity to redefine the ecological, socio-economic, and spatial functions of agricultural landscapes in tropical regions. Based on a systematic review of 44 peer-reviewed articles from 2023 to 2025, the findings indicate that agroforestry systems significantly enhance ecological resilience. These systems contribute to biodiversity conservation by increasing habitat heterogeneity and supporting pollinator populations, while also improving soil quality and carbon sequestration. Such improvements not only mitigate environmental degradation but also elevate the natural attractiveness of the landscape for eco-tourism activities.

In terms of socio-economic impact, agroforestry empowers local communities through livelihood diversification and inclusive participation in tourism-based enterprises. Smallholders, women, and youth benefit from new economic channels such as organic farming, cultural tourism, and nature-based services, reducing dependence on volatile palm oil markets. The cultural authenticity embedded in agroforestry landscapes, particularly those that preserve traditional knowledge and local heritage, enhances the appeal of eco-tourism destinations while reinforcing social capital within rural communities.

From a spatial planning perspective, agroforestry promotes multifunctional land-use configurations that integrate production, conservation, and recreation. The reorganisation of monoculture plantations into stratified systems allows for more efficient land utilisation and increased resilience to climate-related risks. Such designs create ecological corridors and diversified tourism zones, improving accessibility, safety, and experiential value for visitors.

Overall, agroforestry-based oil palm systems create synergies between ecological restoration, community empowerment, and sustainable tourism. These systems demonstrate the feasibility of transitioning from extractive monocultures toward regenerative, inclusive, and diversified land-use models. As such, they represent a scalable and adaptive strategy to develop eco-tourism destinations that are not only economically viable but also environmentally and socially responsible.

Future studies are encouraged to deepen understanding through spatial modelling, ecosystem service valuation, and economic performance assessments across various geographies. Strengthened policy frameworks, market incentives, and cross-sector collaboration will be essential to support the broader implementation of agroforestry in oil palm landscapes globally.

References

1. Tapia JFD, Doliente SS, Samsatli S. How much land is available for sustainable palm oil?. Land Use Policy. 2021; 102: 105187.
2. Ayompe LM, Nkongho RN, Acobta ANB, Tambasi EE, Masso C, Egoh BN. Review of conceptual frameworks for smallholder farmers to achieve sustainable palm oil production. J Clean Prod. 2025; 506: 145525.
3. Jalilov SM, Rochmayanto Y, Hidayat DC, Raharjo JT, Mendham D, Langston JD. Unveiling economic dimensions of peatland restoration in Indonesia: A systematic literature review. Ecosystem Services. 2025; 71: 101693.
4. Futemma C, De Castro F, Brondizio ES. Farmers and social innovations in rural development: collaborative arrangements in eastern brazilian amazon. Land Use Policy. 2020; 99: 104999.
5. Ngango J, Musabanganji E, Maniriho A, Nkikabahizi F, Mukamuhire A, Ng’ombe JN. Does agroforestry contribute to household food security? A micro-perspective from southern Rwanda. For Policy Econ. 2024; 165: 103252.
6. Oelbermann M, Chang SX, Pulleman M, Whalen JK. Transitioning to soil health and carbon sequestration with agroforestry and perennial crop systems. Geoderma Reg. 2024; 39: e00895.
7. Chrisendo D, Krishna VV, Siregar H, Qaim M. Land-use change nutrition and gender roles in Indonesian farm households. For Policy Econ. 2020; 118: 102245.
8. Brandao F, de Castro F, Futemma C. Between structural change and local agency in the palm oil sector: Interactions, heterogeneities and landscape transformations in the Brazilian Amazon. J Rural Stud. 2019; 71: 156-168.
9. Parra-Paitan C, Verburg PH. Accounting for land use changes beyond the farm-level in sustainability assessments: The impact of cocoa production. Sci Total Environ. 2022; 825: 154032.
10. Larson AM, Barletti JPS, Vigil N H. A place at the table is not enough: Accountability for Indigenous Peoples and local communities in multi-stakeholder platforms. World Dev. 2022; 155: 105907.
11. Van Noordwijk M, Duguma LA, Dewi S, Leimona B, Catacutan DC, Lusiana B, et al. SDG synergy between agriculture and forestry in the food, energy water and income nexus: reinventing agroforestry?. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2018; 34: 33-42.
12. Mishra G, Sarkar A, Giri K, Nath AJ, Lal R, Francaviglian R. hanges in soil carbon stocks under plantation systems and natural forests in Northeast India. Ecological Modelling. 2021; 446: 109500.
13. Nath AJ, Sileshi GW, Laskar SY, Pathak K, Rean D, Nath A, et al. Quantifying carbon stocks and sequestration potential in agroforestry systems under divergent management scenarios relevant to India’s Nationally Determined Contribution. J Clean Prod. 2021; 281: 124831.
14. Awazi NP, Kimengsi JN, Balgah RA, Mairomi HW, Tume SJP, Tsufac AR. Chapter 15-Bioeconomy transition for the attainment of Cameroon’s National Development Strategy (NDS30) goal of environmental and nature protection: assessing the all-encompassing contribution of agroforestry. Elsevier. Biodiversity and Bioeconomy. 2024; 325-345.
15. González NC, Kröger M. The potential of Amazon indigenous agroforestry practices and ontologies for rethinking global forest governance. For Policy Econ. 2020; 118: 102257.
16. Rode J, Pinzon A, Stabile MC, Pirker J, Bauch S, Iribarrem A, et al. Why ‘blended finance’could help transitions to sustainable landscapes: Lessons from the Unlocking Forest Finance project. Ecosystem Services. 2019; 37: 100917.
17. Das M, Chandra Nath P, Sileshi GW, Pandey R, Nath AJ, Das AK. Biomass models for estimating carbon storage in Areca palm plantations. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators. 2021; 10: 100115.
18. Daum T, Baudron F, Birner R, Qaim M, Grass I. Addressing agricultural labour issues is key to biodiversity-smart farming. Biol Conserv. 2023; 284: 110165.
19. Zakari S, Liu W, Wu J, Singh AK, Jiang X, Yang B. Decay and erosion-related transport of sulfur compounds in soils of rubber based agroforestry. J Env Manage. 2020; 274: 111200.
20. da Paixao Alves V, Martin DG, Giannini TC, Junior RS, Guimaraes JTF, Moia GCM, et al. The cocoa bioeconomy in the eastern Amazon: An integrated analysis of production, environmental degradation perceptions and socioeconomic factors among farmers. Agricultural Systems. 2025; 229: 104428.
21. Astuti R, Miller MA, McGregor A, Sukmara MDP, Saputra W, Taylor D, et al. Making illegality visible: The governance dilemmas created by visualising illegal palm oil plantations in Central Kalimantan Indonesia. Land Use Policy. 2022; 114: 105942.
22. Montoya-Sanchez V, Camarretta N, Ehbrecht M, Schlund M, Brant Paterno G, Seidel D, et al. Comparing airborne and terrestrial LiDAR with ground-based inventory metrics of vegetation structural complexity in oil palm agroforests. Ecological Indicators. 2024; 166: 112306.
23. Kikuchi T, Seidel D, Ehbrecht M, Zemp DC, Brambach F, Irawan B, et al. Combining planting trees and natural regeneration promotes long-term structural complexity in oil palm landscapes. For Ecol Manage. 2024; 569: 122182.
24. Manpoong C, Tripathi SK, Aravindakshan S, Krupnik TJ. Digging in: Impact of land use changes on soil aggregation patterns and carbon stocks in the moist tropics of the Mizoram in the Indomalayan realm. Total Environ Adv. 2025; 13: 200119.
25. Reich C, Musshoff O. Oil palm smallholders and the road to certification: Insights from Indonesia. J Environ Manage. 2025; 375: 124303.
26. Von GroßV, Sibhatu KT, Knohl A, Qaim M, Veldkamp E, Hölscher D. Transformation scenarios towards multifunctional landscapes: A multi-criteria land-use allocation model applied to Jambi Province Indonesia. J Env Management. 2024; 356: 120710.
27. Grieco E, Vangi E, Chiti T, Collalti A. Impacts of deforestation and land use/land cover change on carbon stock dynamics in Jomoro District, Ghana. J Env Management. 2024; 367: 121993.
28. Kurniawan ID, Sandmann D, Ermilov SG, Widyastuti R, Susanti WI, Potapov AM. et al. Transformation of rainforest into monoculture plantations alters the density, species richness and community composition of oribatid mites and selects for a higher dominance of parthenogenetic species. Global Ecology and Conservation. 2025; 60: e03625.
29. Nakabayashi M, Kanamori T, Matsukawa A, Tangah J, Tuuga A, Malim TP, et al. Behavioral response of Bornean ungulates including bearded pigs and sambar deer, to anthropogenic disturbance in Sabah, Malaysia. Global Ecology and Conservation. 2025; 59: e03580.
30. Pallavi Röll A, Marques I, Ramadhani DN, Valdes-Uribe A, Hendrayanto H, Hölscher D. Changes in leaf area index by tropical forest transformation to plantations increase below-canopy surface temperatures. Global Ecology and Conservation. 2024; 53: e03001.
31. Hossan MS, Afjal, MI, Hasan MF, Hanif MA. Assessment of land dynamics transformation into tea plantations using support vector machine. Trees Forests and People. 2024; 18: 100703.
32. Prabawani B, Hadi SP, Fisher MR, Warsono H, Dewi RS, Ainuddin I. Socioeconomic perspective of agroforestry development in Central Java. Env Sustainability Indicators. 2024; 22: 100354.
33. Rumondang AL, Yulizah Y, Rahajoe JS, Adman B, Maharani R, Rayadin Y et al. Conserving native Kalimantan species: the role of agroforestry in biodiversity conservation and carbon storage. Trees Forests and People. 2025; 20: 100891.
34. Gnanavelrajah N, Theepika S, Karthigesu J, Raveendran S. Palmyrah (Borassus flabellifer) palm land-use system: A potential key tool for enhancing carbon stock and floristic diversity in a dry zone tropical landscape. Trees Forests and People. 2025; 20: 100827.
35. Janzen S, Balzer J, Merk F, Eberle C, Chabi A, Walz Y. Moving towards a comprehensive evaluation of ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction: The example of agroforestry for flood risk reduction. Nature-Based Solutions. 2024; 5: 100104.
36. Awazi NP, Tsufac AR, Ambebe TF. The tree species diversity -Soil macrofauna nexus in cocoa-based agroforests in Cameroon: A biophysical assessment. Soil Advances. 2025; 3: 100042.
37. Mairomi HW, Kimengsi JN. Mapping actors’ interests and protected area management outcomes in the Campo Ma’an landscape of Cameroon. Forest Policy and Economics. 2025; 174: 103493.
38. Hairiah K, Burgers P, Farida A, Kusumawati IA, Mardiani MO, Saputra DD. Soil health indicators, farmer concepts and carbon market standards in agroforestation of underutilized lands in West Sumatra (Indonesia). Soil Advances. 2025; 3: 100051.
39. Ayesu S, Agbyenyaga O, Barnes VR, Gyamfi A, Asante RK. Advancing multiple ecosystem service assessment in the tropics: Evidence from Barekese and Owabi watersheds in Ghana. Heliyon. 2024; 10: e37499.
40. Song C, Choi HA, Choi E, Yang AR, Lee WK, Lim CH. Setting the direction of sustainable restoration projects in peatlands considering ecosystem services: Case of Jambi and Sumatra Selatan, Indonesia. Ecological Indicators. 2024; 160: 111784.
41. Gunawan H, Setyawati T, Atmoko T, Kwatrina RT, Yeny I, Yuwati TW, et al. A review of forest fragmentation in Indonesia under the DPSIR framework for biodiversity conservation strategies. Global Ecology and Conservation. 2024.
42. Holle MJM, Apriyani V, Mumbunan S. Systematic evidence map of coffee agroecosystem management and biodiversity linkages in producing countries. Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy. 2025; 11: 100147.
43. Therias A, Rafiee A, Lhermitte S, van der Lugt P, Lindenbergh R. Integrating radar and multi-spectral data to detect cocoa crops: a deep learning approach. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment. 2025; 99: 101652.
44. Purnomo H, Puspitaloka D, Okarda B, Andrianto A, Qomar N, Sutikno S, et al. Community-based fire prevention and peatland restoration in Indonesia: A participatory action research approach. Environmental Development. 2024; 50.
45. Chowdhury P, Mahi NA, Yeassin R, Chowdhury NUR, Farrok O. Biomass to biofuel: Impacts and mitigation of environmental health and socioeconomic challenges. Energy Conversion and Management: X. 2025; 25: 100889.
46. Rahayu HP, Alim AHFS, Blok K, Nasu S, Mangkoesoebroto G. Recognizing social forestry’s role in bioenergy optimization through geospatial fuzzy-multicriteria analysis. Energy for Sustainable Development. 2024; 83: 101566.
47. Santoro S, Pagano A, Francesconi W, Mello D, Giordano R. Biodiversity-Climate-Society Nexus assessment through Participatory System Dynamics Model. The case study of Amazon forest-based value chain. Science of the Total Environment. 2025; 991: 179893.
48. Kamath V, Sassen M, Arnell A, van Soesbergen A, Bunn C. Identifying areas where biodiversity is at risk from potential cocoa expansion in the Congo Basin. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 2024; 376: 109216.
49. Van der Haar S, Gallagher EJ, Schoneveld GC, Slingerland MA, Leeuwis C. Climate-smart cocoa in forest landscapes: Lessons from institutional innovations in Ghana. Land Use Policy. 2023; 132: 106819.
50. De Jong J, Poorter L, de Jong W, Bongers F, Lohbeck M, Veenendaal E, et al. Dissecting forest transition: Contribution of mature forests, second-growth forests and tree plantations to tree cover dynamics in the tropics. Land Use Policy. 2025; 153: 107545.
51. Dugasseh FA, Zandersen M. Farmer perceptions of REDD+ livelihood interventions as incentive mechanism for reducing deforestation in the Juabuso-Bia cocoa forest landscape. Forest Policy and Economics. 2025; 175: 103494.
52. Chen H, Chen Y, Mansaray LR, Li L, Wang S. Land cover change mitigated 20% of the total increased evapotranspiration in tropical Lancang-Mekong River Basin during 2001-2019. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies. 2025; 57: 102160.
53. Salmerón-Manzano E, Manzano-Agugliaro F. Worldwide research trends on land tenure. Land Use Policy. 2023; 131: 106727.
54. Kissanga R, Catarino L, Máguas C, Cabral AIR. Dynamics of land-cover change and characterization of charcoal production and trade in southwestern Angola. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment. 2024; 34: 101162.
55. Sa’adi Z, Alias NE, Yusop Z, Chow MF, Muhammad MKI, Mazilamani LS, et al. Spatiotemporal assessment of rainfall and drought projection for integrated dam management in Benut River Basin, Malaysia under CMIP6 scenarios. Environmental Challenges. 2024; 15: 100892.
56. Macdonald K, Diprose R, Pugley DD. Scaling-up sustainable commodity governance through jurisdictional initiatives: Political pathways to sector transformation in the Indonesian palm oil sector? World Development. 2024; 176: 106504.
57. Quevedo JMD, Lukman KM, Ulumuddin YI, Uchiyama Y, Kohsaka R. Applying the DPSIR framework to qualitatively assess the globally important mangrove ecosystems of Indonesia: A review towards evidence-based policymaking approaches. Marine Policy. 2023; 147: 105354.
58. Koutika LS, Henry B, Schepp C, Olaleye A, Amiraslani F, Minasny, B, et al. Enhancing “4 per 1000” initiative implementation through region-specific agricultural and forestry practices. Soil Advances. 2025; 4: 100057.
59. Talwar S, Dhir A, Luqman A, Gupta J, Gugnani R. Charting the path toward a greener world: A review of facilitating and inhibiting factors for carbon neutrality. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2023; 423: 138423.
60. Rochmayanto Y, Nurrochmat DR, Nugroho B, Darusman D, Satria A, Casse T, Wicaksono D. Devolution of forest management to local communities and its impacts on livelihoods and deforestation in Berau Indonesia. Heliyon. 2023; 9.
61. Wang L, Wei F, Svenning JC. Accelerated cropland expansion into high integrity forests and protected areas globally in the 21st century. IScience. 2023; 26: 106450.
62. Axelsson EP, Grady KC, Alloysius D, Falck J, Lussetti D, Vairappan CS, et al. Lessons learned from 25 years of operational large-scale restoration: The Sow-A-Seed project Sabah Borneo. Ecological Engineering. 2024; 206: 107282.
63. Sovacool BK, Del Rio DF, Zhang W. The political economy of net-zero transitions: Policy drivers, barriers, and justice benefits to decarbonization in eight carbon-neutral countries. J Env Management. 2023; 347: 119154.
64. Dembélé F, Guuroh RT, Ansah PB, Asare DCBM, Da SS, Aryee JNA et al. Land use land cover change and intensity analysis of land transformation in and around a moist semi-deciduous forest in Ghana. Trees Forests and People. 2024; 15: 100507.
65. Birkhofer K, Bird T, Alfeus M, Arvidsson F, Buxton M, Djoudi EA et al. Smallholder agriculture in African dryland agroecosystems has limited impact on trophic group composition, but affects arthropod provision of ecosystem services. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 2024; 363: 108860.
66. Mardiatmoko G. Chapter 21-Biomass-based agroforestry for sustainable land use planning and management. In M. (Eds.) Agroforestry for Carbon and Ecosystem Management .Academic Press. 2024; 283-293.
67. Donfack LS, Röll A, Ellsäßer F, Ehbrecht M, Irawan B, Hölscher D et al. Dataset on microclimate and drone-based thermal patterns within an oil palm agroforestry system. Data in Brief. 2021; 39: 107615.
68. Siregar AA, Halimatussadiah A, Moeis FR, Anky WAK, Nainggolan D. The oil palm replanting imperative: Are smallholder farmers willing to participate? Forest Policy and Economics. 2024; 169: 103362.
69. Tohiran KA, Nobilly F, Zulkifli R, Yahya MS, Norhisham AR, Rasyidi MZ. et al. Multi-species rotational grazing of small ruminants regenerates undergrowth vegetation while controlling weeds in the oil palm silvopastoral system. Agricultural Systems. 2023; 210: 103720.
70. Sofiyuddin M, Suyanto S, Kadir S, Dewi S. Sustainable land preparation for farmer-managed lowland agriculture in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics. 2021; 130: 102534.
71. Korol Y, Khokthong W, Zemp DC, Irawan B, Kreft H, Hölscher D. Scattered trees in an oil palm landscape: Density, size and distribution. Global Ecology and Conservation. 2021; 28: e01688.
72. Abubakar A, Gambo J, Ishak MY. Navigating climate challenges: Unraveling the effects of climate change on oil palm cultivation and adaptation strategies. In Advances in Food Security and Sustainability. Elsevier. 2023; 8: 95-116.
73. Zem DC, Ehbrecht M, Seidel D, Ammer C, Craven D, Erkelenz J, Irawan B et al. Mixed-species tree plantings enhance structural complexity in oil palm plantations. Agriculture. Ecosystems & Environment. 2019; 283: 106564.
74. Rudolf K, Hennings N, Dippold MA, Edison E, Wollni M. Improving economic and environmental outcomes in oil palm smallholdings: The relationship between mulching, soil properties and yields. Agricultural Systems. 2021; 193: 103242.
75. Nyarko H, Ashiagbor G. Can Ghana’s Cocoa Forest REDD+ program achieve its intended goals of promoting sustainable cocoa production and enhancing carbon stocks? Journal of Environmental Management. 2025; 382: 125376.
76. Rudolf K, Romero M, Asnaw R, Irawan B, Wollni M. Effects of information and seedling provision on tree planting and survival in smallholder oil palm plantations. J Env Econ Management. 2020; 104: 102361.

77. Meijide A, Badu CS, Moyano F, Tiralla N, Gunawan D, Knohl A. Impact of forest conversion to oil palm and rubber plantations on microclimate and the role of the 2015 ENSO event. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 2028; 252: 208-219.
78. Córdoba D, Juen L, Selfa T, Peredo AM De Assis Montag LF, Sombra D, Santosm MPD. Understanding local perceptions of the impacts of large-scale oil palm plantations on ecosystem services in the Brazilian Amazon. Forest Policy and Economics. 2019; 109: 102007.
79. Bhoi TK, Samal I, Behera B, Mahanta DK, Komal J, Athulya R. Predatory birds in agroforestry: Dawn of a new era for biological control from multitrophic interactions. Avian Research. 2025; 16: 100260.
80. Asaaga FA, Hirons MA, Malhi Y. Questioning the link between tenure security and sustainable land management in cocoa landscapes in Ghana. World Development. 2020; 130: 104913.
81. Tan ZD, Lupascu M, Wijedasa LS. Paludiculture as a sustainable land use alternative for tropical peatlands: A review. Science of the Total Environment. 2020; 753: 142111.