Electrochemical Detection Of Hydrazine Using Ruthenium bis(1,10- Phenanthroline)(4-Methyl-4’vinyl-2,2’-Bipyridine) Polymer Films In Flow Injection Analysis
Brown KL
Published on: 2021-12-12
Abstract
Cyclic voltammetry was used to electropolymerize ruthenium bis(1,10-phenanthroline)(4-methyl-4’vinyl-2,2’-bipyridine) onto glassy carbon electrodes to prepare multi-layered polymer films. These films were characterized in the presence of hydrazine and found to be redox mediators for the oxidation of hydrazine in aqueous environments. The polymer films were electrochemically active after repetitive electrochemical stimulation. Afterwards, the polymer films were incorporated into an automated continuous flow injection analysis system to determine the concentration of hydrazine in drinking water. Using the flow injection analysis system, a linear calibration curve response for hydrazine was obtained in the range 0.0010 mol. L-1- 0.050 mol. L-1.
Keywords
Electropolymerization; Flow injection analysis; Cyclic voltammetryIntroduction
Environmental and biochemical studies have identified hydrazine (N2H4) as a compound that negatively affects the liver, kidneys, and the blood [1]. The American Conference of Governmental Hygienists lowered the threshold limit concentration for hydrazine to 10 ppb for an 8-hour exposure time [1]. Industrial uses for hydrazine include corrosion inhibitors, pesticides, and rocket fuel, all of which can pollute soil and groundwater systems [2]. Consequently, there is a need to study hydrazine chemistry to develop simple, inexpensive, portable, and sensitive sensors and monitoring systems for the real-time detection and determination of this compound in trace amounts. Current efforts to detect hydrazine employ methods such as chemiluminescence with FIA, ion chromatography, and spectroscopy [3-6]. For example, a hydrazine detection method based on supressing luminol chemiluminescence in a flow system has been developed. Although the flow sensor is stable for over 400 analyses, a complete analysis requires 2 minutes [7]. Some of these methods and sensors are generally expensive, complex, and have long analysis and recovery times. Electrochemical studies of hydrazine chemistry have shown that some ruthenium complexes in the appropriate oxidation state reacts with hydrazine in bulk solution in an electrocatalytic cycle [8]. Electrochemical detection of this analyte provides detection limits comparable to other methods, but with a simplified detection scheme. Previously, we reported on some of the electrochemistry of ruthenium bis(1,10-phenanthroline)(4-methyl-4’vinyl-2,2’- bipyridine) polymer films in organic solvents, but not in aqueous environments [9]. Two important advantages of using polymeric thin films as components in chemical and electrochemical sensing are the ability to (1) effectively control the physical and chemical characteristics of the reaction system, and (2) provide a significantly higher “effective concentration” per surface area for reactions to occur. However, the challenge in designing polymeric films for sensing applications is structuring the molecular architecture of the monomer to form the polymer film to facilitate and direct electronic and ionic charge transfer reactions at the electrode|film|solution interfaces and within the polymer film [9]. The goal of this research was to develop a detection scheme for hydrazine using a ruthenium bis(1,10-phenanthroline)(4-methyl-4’vinyl-2,2’-bipyridine) polymer film, which is the electroactive polymer film in contact with hydrazine solutions in a flow injection analysis (FIA) system.
Experimental
Solutions and Electrochemical Instrumentation
The concentrations of the ruthenium bis(1,10-phenanthroline)(4-methyl-4’vinyl-2,2’-bipyridine) complex and the supporting electrolyte solutions in propylene carbonate were 1.00 x 10-3 mol. L-1 and 0.100 mol. L-1, respectively. The ruthenium complex was synthesized according to published procedures with no deviations thereof [10]. Tetraethylammonium perchlorate (TEAP), the supporting electrolyte, obtained from GFS Chemicals (Columbus, OH), was dried under vacuum to remove its water content prior to use in electrochemical measurements. Buffered solutions (pH 7.00) prepared from 0.100 mol. L-1 sodium phosphate were used in the cyclic voltammetric characterization of the films in the presence of hydrazine and in FIA measurements.
Electrochemical measurements in a three-electrode cell configuration were made with a CHInstruments 660 Series Potentiostat (CHInstruments, Texas). The three-electrode cell system for all cyclic voltammetric and hydrodynamic measurements were made using a glassy carbon working electrode (0.0760 cm2 ), a platinum auxiliary electrode, and a silver/silver chloride reference electrode (3 M KCl). All solutions were deoxygenated with nitrogen prior to commencing with electrochemical measurements and a nitrogen blanket was maintained on the solutions during the measurements.
Preparation And Characterization Of Ruthenium bis(1,10-Phenanthroline)(4-methyl-4’vinyl-2,2’-bipyridine) Polymer Films Using Cyclic Voltammetry
Prior to using the glassy carbon and platinum electrodes, they were polished using 0.05 µm polishing alumina obtained from Bioanalytical Systems. Details of the polishing procedure are described elsewhere [11]. The potential window for the electropolymerization of the ruthenium complex and characterization of the polymer films was 1.600 V to -1.600 V. To determine the optimum film thickness for monitoring hydrazine, the number of cyclic voltammetric scans at 100 mV. sec-1 varied from 10 to 90. The films were characterized in 0.100 mol. L-1 TEAP in propylene carbonate using a scan rate of 10 mV. sec-1.
Electrochemical Detection of Hydrazine Using Flow Injection Analysis
A Coulochem III electrochemical detector (ESA, Inc., Chelmsford, MA), equipped with an analytical flow cell (model 5040) and a guard cell (model 5020) was used in all FIA measurements.
The analytical cell housed the target glassy carbon electrode (0.076 cm2), an auxiliary stainless-steel electrode, and a solid-state palladium reference electrode. The applied potential of the analytical cell was 0.700 V. The guard cell, consisting of a porous graphite electrode, a stainless-steel electrode, and a solid-state palladium reference electrode was used to remove any impurities existing in the carrier solution when potential was held at -0.800 V. The guard cell was placed between the pump and injector system, but before the analytical flow cell. Flow rates of 0.25 mL. min-1-1.00mL. min-1 were used to optimize the analytical signal. In addition, injection volumes of 25 µL -75 µL were used to study the impact of the injection volume on the analytical signal. Figure 1 shows a schematic block diagram of the FIA system wherein: P=pump, CS=carrier stream, GC=guard cell, AC=analytical cell, ED=electrochemical detector control station, and W=waste.

Figure 1: Schematic block diagram of the FIA system. CS and P=carrier stream and pump; GC= guard cell; AC= analytical cell containing the target glassy carbon electrode; ED=electrochemical detector; and w=waste.
For the flow system, a dual-piston pump (Perkin Elmer, LC Series 200) delivered the carrier stream phase. Injections were made using a Perkin Elmer Series 200 autosampler with a delivery precision <0.5% (RSD).
Results And Discussion
Electropolymerization And Characterization Of Ruthenium bis(1,10-phenanthroline) (4- methyl-4’vinyl-2,2’-bipyridine)
The electrochemistry and electropolymerization of ruthenium bis(1,10-phenanthroline)(4-methyl-4’vinyl-2,2’-bipyridine) was examined using cyclic voltammetry. Figure 2 shows the electropolymerization of the ruthenium complex after completing ninety cyclic voltammetric scans. Three reversible redox couples identified during the electropolymerization are represented by Equations (1) - (3). During the initial electropolymerization, the redox transformations are reversible with peak separations, ΔEp, approximately equal to 59 mV/n, where n=1. However, as the process continues, the system becomes quasireversible (ΔEp > 59 mV/n). All of the peaks corresponding to Equations (1) - (3) increase in peak currents, which is indicative of forming the polymer film. Beyond ninety cyclic voltammetric scans, the peak currents do not increase and as a result, the sequence of cyclic voltammetric scans was stopped. Peaks 1 and 2 correspond to the reduction and oxidation of ruthenium. However, peaks 3 and 4, and 5 and 6 redox couples, each correspond to one-electron reduction and oxidation of the vinyl-2, 2’-bipyridine (vbpy) substituent, such that the -vbpy is finally reduced to -vbpy2-. The electropolymerization process is initiated through a reduction of the vinyl substituent attached to the ring system and 1, 10-phenanthroline ligand system. Details pertaining the reaction mechanism to form the polymer film are discussed by Anson and co-workers [10].

Figure 2: Electropolymerization of 1.00 x 10-3 mol. L-1 ruthenium complex with 0.100 mol. L-1 TEAP in propylene carbonate.
The formal reduction potential, E?’, of the redox couples is the average of the cathodic peak and anodic peak potentials. Figure 3 shows a characterization cyclic voltammogram of the polymer film on the glassy carbon electrode compared to a clean glassy carbon electrode, both in the supporting electrolyte solution. When the electrode was rinsed with fresh solvent and placed in the supporting electrolyte solution for cyclic voltammetric characterization at lower scan rates (i.e., 10 mV. s-1), the redox couples shown in Figure 2 corresponding to equations (1) – (3) persist upon repetitive cycling. Table 1 provides a summary of the Eo’values for the redox couples of cyclic voltammograms in Figures 2 and 3.
Table 1: Summary of Formal Reduction Potentials of Figures 2 and 3.
|
Redox Couple |
Electropolymerization |
Characterization |
|
Ru(III/II) |
+1.193 V |
+1.222 V |
|
Ru(II), (vbpy/vbpy- ) |
-1.295 V |
-1.270 V |
|
Ru(II), (vbpy-/vbpy2-) |
-1.454 V |
-1.454 V |
The E?’ differences between the electropolymerization and characterization are less than 60 mV, while the ΔEp values for the electropolymerization redox couples range from 0.081 V to 0.114 V; the ΔEp values during characterization of the same redox couples vary from 0.010 V to 0.040 V.

Figure 3: Characterization of the ruthenium polymer film compared to an unmodified clean glassy carbon electrode in 0.100 mol.L-1 TEAP in propylene carbonate.
The faradaic response of the films results from electron hopping between the redox centers and the concomitant ingress of ions from the supporting electrolyte solution into the polymer films; or, the egress of ions from the polymer film. Either process is necessary to maintain charge electroneutrality within the polymer films [12-13]. Worth mentioning is the presence of the other anodic and cathodic peaks at 1.100 V and -1.050 V, respectively. These peaks are ascribed to possible thermodynamically charge trapping and leakage between the inner and outer layers of the films; this observation of charge trapping and leakage has been noted for other ruthenium-based polymer films [14]. However, the charge trapping and leakage properties of these films have not been investigated further. The films are electrochemically active with only a small change in the peak currents when tested using cyclic voltammetry for ten days in 0.100 mol. L-1 TEAP in propylene carbonate. Figure 4 shows a cyclic voltammogram characterization of the polymer film in an aqueous 0.100 mol. L-1 sodium phosphate buffered solution of pH 7.00; the polymer films continue to be electrochemically active in the potential window. However, only four peaks are evident in the cyclic voltammogram for the polymer film. These films are not homogeneous throughout as evidenced by the asymmetry of the peaks, wherein the peak width at half-height differs from the theoretical value of 90.6 mV/n, which indicates the presence of non-equivalent redox centers or attractive-repulsive forces within the polymer film. Furthermore, studies have shown that the porosity of polymer films can change throughout, which alters the diffusional pathway of ions in the polymer films [16]. In Figure 4, the anodic peaks have shifted by 200 mV, such that the redox couples related to Equations (2) and (3) are not present within the potential window. The anodic and cathodic peaks shown in Figure 4 correspond to Equation (1) and the charge trapping and leakage processes of the films. The solvation of the polymer film in an aqueous environment is reduced, and therefore charge transfer and ionic transport within the polymer film are altered and lowered when compared to characterization with 0.100 mol. L-1 TEAP in propylene carbonate. The reduced solvation of the polymer film in the aqueous solution results in a change in the electrochemical activity of the polymer film.

Figure 4: Characterization of ruthenium polymer film in aqueous 0.100 mol.L-1 phosphate buffer, pH 7.00.
Cyclic Voltammetric Characterization Of Ruthenium bis(1,10-phenanthroline)(4-methyl4’vinyl-2,2’-bipyridine) Polymer Films In Hydrazine Solution
Cyclic voltammogram (A) of Figure 5 that shows no significant electrochemical activity in the potential window corresponds to a bare glassy carbon electrode in the presence of 0.010 mol. L-1 hydrazine solution. Figure 5 also shows an overlay of characterization cyclic voltammograms corresponding to 0.0050 mol. L-1 (B), 0.010 mol. L-1 (C), and 0.020 mol. L-1 (D) hydrazine solutions in the presence of the ruthenium-based polymer film. The prominent anodic peak for cyclic voltammograms (B)-(D) represents the oxidation of hydrazine at 0.430 V, 0.530 V, and 0.600 V, respectively.

Figure 5: A) Characterization of clean GC electrode in the presence of 0.010 M hydrazine. B-D) Characterization of ruthenium film in the presence of 0.0050 M, 0.010 M, and 0.020 M hydrazine, respectively.
As the hydrazine concentration increases, the anodic peak current increases and peak potential shifts to more positive potentials; the latter indicates a slight increase in the overpotential needed for hydrazine oxidation. Using the anodic peak currents of Figure 5, a calibration curve shown in Figure 6, with a range of 0.0010 mol. L-1-0.010 mol. L-1 and a correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.997 generated a linear trend according to equation 4. With Equation 4, a detection of 0.20 mmol. L-1 was obtained.
![]()

Figure 6: Calibration curve for the hydrazine using cyclic voltammetry.
A diagnostic plot of the anodic peak current for hydrazine versus the square root of scan rate is linear, indicating that the anodic peak current and the hydrazine reaction are controlled by diffusion of hydrazine to the modified electrode surface at an adequate overpotential [15]. The significant decrease of the cathodic peak currents and increase of the anodic peak current in the presence of hydrazine is indicative of a mediated electron transfer reaction between the polymer film and hydrazine. First, hydrazine forms an adduct with the polymer film to subsequently become oxidized, whereas the film becomes reduced according to Equation 6. The Ru3+ oxidation state can be restored through an electrode process shown in Equation 7. The following sequence of reactions provides the electrochemical response of hydrazine in the presence of the ruthenium-based polymer film:

Flow Injection Analysis Approach
In the FIA approach, the polymer film on the target glassy carbon electrode was placed in the amperometric flow cell. The flow rate of the carrier solution flowing across the electrode was optimized at 0.75 mL. min-1 to maximize the analytical signal or peak height and minimize diffusion of hydrazine flowing through the system after the point of injection. In this design, the analytical signal decreases with increasing flow rates because the analyte, hydrazine, has a reduced residence time at the electrode surface. However, decreasing the flow rate allows more time for diffusion of hydrazine while under the forces of a hydrodynamic flow. Injection volumes of 25 µL, 50 µL, and 75 µL were used to optimize the analytical signal. Injections volumes of 50 µL and 75 µL produced the highest analytical signals, however, there was no significant difference in the analytical signal between the 50-µl and 75-µL injection volumes. As a result, 50-µL injection volumes were used in FIA measurements. Figure 7 shows a hydrodynamic amperomogram in 0.010 mol. L-1 hydrazine with the ruthenium-based polymer film present on the glassy carbon electrode. When using -0.800 V to -0.200 V constant applied potentials there is no significant faradaic current. However, a faradaic current begins to increase when the applied potentials were greater than -0.400 V; the current eventually becomes steady-state near 0.500 V, which corresponds to the results obtained in the cyclic voltammetric characterization of the polymer film in the presence of hydrazine shown in Figure 5 (B)-(D).

Figure 7: Hydrodynamic amperomogram using a stirred system using applied potentials: -0.800 V, -0.600 V, - 0.400 V, -0.200 V, 0.00 V, 0.500 V, and 0.700 V vs Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl).
Using the FIA system containing the ruthenium polymer film on the target glassy carbon electrode, a profile of 50-µL hydrazine injections with concentrations of 0.0010 mol. L-1- 0.050 mol. L-1 is shown in Figure 8.

The peak height is used as the analytical signal, which increases with higher concentrations of hydrazine. The calibration curve shown in Figure 9 with linearity in the range 0.0010 mol. L-1- 0.050 mol. L-1 has an equation with a correlation coefficient, R2, of 0.991:
peak height= 13422 (mV/M)[hydrazine] + 1.39 mV (8)

Figure 9: Calibration curve for hydrazine in FIA using fifty microliter injections of hydrazine with the polymer ruthenium film on glassy carbon electrode; flow rate is 0.75 mL. min-1.
Using the calibration curve, a detection limit of 0.42 mmol. L-1 was achieved. Figure 10 shows the response of the FIA system when water samples with added hydrazine are evaluated; each sample was tested using double injections to evaluate the stability of the film. For each set of injections, the second injection is slightly lower (c.a. 2%) as a result of continued use of the film in the FIA system.

Figure 10: Duplicate 50-µL injections of added hydrazine in water into the FIA system at 0.75 mL. min-1 using the polymer ruthenium film.
No doubt, the shearing force of the continuous flow of solution across the electrode causes a slight degradation of the film; the flow of carrier solution across the polymer film was not stopped between injections. Based on Equation 8, Table 2 shows the average (n=4) results of hydrazine added to drinking water samples. There is no significant difference between the amount of hydrazine added to water and the amount of hydrazine found in the water. The polymer film demonstrates good stability after forty-five minutes of repetitive use in the FIA system, which can process c.a. 120 samples/hour.
Table 2: Determination of hydrazine (mmol. L-1) in water samples; n=4.
|
Spiked |
Found |
Recovery (%) |
RSD (%) |
|
7.5 |
7.0 |
93 |
3.4 |
|
9.0 |
8.8 |
97 |
4.1 |
|
14 |
13.1 |
94 |
2.6 |
Conclusion
The electropolymerization of ruthenium bis(1,10-phenanthroline)(4-methyl-4’vinyl-2,2’- bipyridine) produces a multilayered polymer film that shows good electrochemical response in an aqueous environment, which has not been reported before. Cyclic voltammetric characterization of polymer films in the presence of hydrazine produces a strong anodic peak current that increases with hydrazine concentration indicating that the polymer films do function as a redox mediator. Hydrodynamic studies confirm the results on the oxidation potential for hydrazine acquired by cyclic voltammetry. The films are capable of being used in FIA systems for the determination of hydrazine in water. Although there is a slight decrease (c.a. 2%) in the peak height of multiple hydrazine injections of the same concentration, the FIA system can process approximately 120 samples/hour.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by Hope College Department of Chemistry Endowed Research Funds.
References
- Vernot EH, McEwen JD, Bruner RH, Haun CC, Kinkead ER. Long-Term inhalation toxicity of hydrazine. Fund App Toxicol. 1985; 5: 1050-1064.
- Troyan JE. Properties, production, and uses of hydrazine. Ind Eng Chem. 1953; 45: 2608-2612.
- Safavi A, Ensafi AA. Kinetic spectrometric determination of hydrazine. Anal Chim Acta. 1995; 300: 307-311.
- Golabi SM, Zare HR. Electrocatalytic oxidation of hydrazine at glassy carbon electrode modified with electrodeposited film derived from caffeic acid. Electroanalysis. 1999; 11: 1293-1300.
- Guerra SV, Kubota LT, Xavier CL, Nakagaki S. Experimental optimization of selective hydrazine detection in flow injection analysis using a carbon paste electrode modified with copper porphyrin occluded into zeolite cavity. Anal Sci. 1999; 15: 1231- 1234.
- Gilbert R, Rioux R. Ion chromatographic determination of morpholine and cyclohexylamine in aqueous solutions containing ammonia and hydrazine. Anal. Chem. 1984; 56: 106-109.
- Song Z, Wang L, Zhoa T. Chemiluminescence flow sensor for hydrazine with immobilized reagents. Anal. Lett. 2001; 34: 399-413.
- Pinter JS, Brown KL, DeYoung PA, Peaslee GF. Amperometric detection of hydrazine by cyclic voltammetry and flow injection analysis using ruthenium modified glassy carbon electrodes. Talanta. 2006; 71: 1219-1225.
- Brown KL, Gray SB. Cyclic voltammetric studies of electropolymerized films based on Ruthenium(II/III)Bis(1,10 phenanthroline)(4-methyl-4’vinyl-2,2’-bibyridine). Int J Chem. 2010; 2: 3-9.
- Guarr TF, Anson FC. Electropolymerization of Ruthenium (Bis(1,10-Phenanthroline)(4- Methyl-4’-Vinyl2,2’-Bipyridine) complexes through direct attack on the ligand ring system. J Phys Chem. 1987; 91: 4037-4043.
- Elgrishi N, Rountree KJ, McCarthy BD. A practical beginner’s guide to cyclic voltammetry. J Chem Educ. 2018; 95: 197-206.
- Brown KL, Mottola HA. Voltammetric, chronocoulometric, and spectroelectrochemical studies of electropolymerized films based on Cu(II/I)−4,9,16,23- Tetraaminophthalocyanine. Langmuir. 1998; 14: 3411-3417.
- Daum P, Murray RW. Charge-transfer diffusion rates and activity relationships during oxidation and reduction of plasma-polymerized vinylferrocene films. J Phys Chem. 1981; 85: 389-396.
- Leidner CR, Denisevich P, Willman KW, Murray RW. Charge trapping reactions in bilayer electrodes. J Electroanal. Chem Inter Electrochem. 1984; 164: 63-78.
- Raoof J-B, Ojani R, Mohammadpour Z. Electrocatalytic oxidation and voltammetric determination of hydrazine by 1,1-Ferrocenedicarboxylic acid at glassy carbon electrode. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2010; (5): 177-188.
- Brown KL, Danforth R., Bleitz E, Hwang Y, Rens D. Cyclic voltammetric and spectroelectrochemical studies of Tris(5-amino-1,10-Phenanthroline)Iron(II) polymer films. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2020; 15: 10707-10721.